He
also says President Kumaratunga was not the prime ministerial candidate for D.B.Wijetunge
to hand over powers to her. "Like me, many others were disappointed but of course we
did not make a big fuss. The party was not professionally handled. We tried to correct
things but failed. I finally decided to leave the party because there was a
non-professional approach to governance. On the other hand now I am glad to be with the
opposition leader Ranil Wickremesinghe whom I have known from the age of 10 from Royal
college. I know he has a vision for the country," he told The Sunday Leader.
Following are excerpts;
Q: What made you leave the SLFP and join the UNP?
A: The basic reason is the handling of the economy and the
unprofessional approach to governance. As far as I am concerned there has never been a
professional approach to anything that the PA did. For instance, President Kumaratunga
never came for anything on time. Sometimes we are asked to come at 9.00 am but the meeting
starts at 12.00 noon. There have been many times when I have slept in the president's
house. This has been going on for the past six to seven years. And that is why the economy
of the country is in this pitiful state. There are no foreign investments coming. The PA
made it worse by linking up with the JVP. You see, the PA was bad enough but linking up
with the JVP made it even worse.
During my period in the industries ministry I saw a large number of industries closing
up. If you take the PA manifesto and go through one by one, you will see that none of them
have been implemented. The north-east war, eradication of the cost of living, giving
employment to the unemployed etc,. all those promises have not been kept. And my reason to
join the UNP was that I found out that the leader of the opposition Hon. Ranil
Wickremesinghe had a vision for the country and I think that under his leadership we could
revive the economy which is the most important thing in a country.
Q: At what stage did you feel or find out that there was poor governance in the
country under the PA?
A: To be frank I have been having this feeling for quite some time.
Her Excellency always had left of centre ideas. I personally felt that she could never
pursue a genuine economic policy. Because her heart was not for an open economy. From 1989
we were branded as right wing because from this time onwards we have been telling that the
SLFP should follow the open economy. We also at that time said that the best person who
could manage the open economy should lead the country. In President Kumaratunga's case she
had left of centre leanings. This is why President Kumaratunga failed because an open
economy was not even close to her heart.
Q: Do you say that the selection of leadership of the party was wrong?
A: Yes. That is what I should say. In 1994 the selection for the party
leadership was flawed. This is why we were marginalised and not made use of. We were bold
enough to say that the person who had knowledge on an open economy should lead the party.
Q: So in your view, from the word 'go' there had been problems within the party
over the leadership?
A: Yes. Because Chandrika Kumaratunga never was interested in an open
economy. She did not believe in the importance of the private sector. Q: But why could you
not point out these things to the President at that time? And why now?
We tried but failed. During the first term we thought, with the kind of advisors she
had, she would resort to adapting herself to the policies of the market economy but
nothing happened. We also found out that even the so called advisors were left of centre
who could not give her good advice.
Q: Some of the members who crossed over to the UNP say that President
Kumaratunga's governance was based on the advice given to her by a few officials and not
even cabinet ministers. Is it true?
A: Yes. She would not even listen to the ministers but a few
officials. Those officials gave her dead ropes.
Q: We understand that President Kumaratunga tried to persuade you to remain in
the SLFP. What made you not concede her request in view of your family
relationships?
A: Yes, for the last few days she has been telephoning me asking me to
stay back. But I told her that I have made my decision for the sake of the country. As I
said earlier the PA has not fulfilled anything that is mentioned in its manifesto. Can you
point out just one?
Q: When President Kumaratunga sliced the jumbo sized cabinet and reduced the
number from 40 to 20, you were overlooked for Dr. Sarath Amunugama. Now has this by any
means seriously affected you and the SLFP especially in the Kandy district?
A: Yes, I was the minister for just eleven months and the work I had
begun was short lived. At least President Kumaratunga should have consulted us and told us
that she had a difficulty. Then at least I could have been the deputy minister of sports.
Now, I started a stadium at Pallekele and that is stopped half way. I have already spent
50 million rupees and that is half way. I had a grand plan for national reconciliation
through sports. You know for the first time youths from Jaffna took part in the Kurunegala
sports festival.
I always believed that the best tool for national reconciliation is sports. I always
believed that schools were the cradle for sports and for a country like Sri Lanka which is
not rich, I think the schools are the best place to start from. So I had a special
programme particularly for football. So when we had ideas to improve the country she
should not have pushed us from pillar to post. Our portfolios were changed as and when she
wanted. This affects the country in particular. For instance when I was in charge of the
Tourism ministry I got down 10,000 visitors from London during the English cricket team
tour. Now this is unheard of. So we were able to boost tourism by doing this. But when we
are pushed from all sides how could we do anything properly?
Q: Would you describe the PA administration as a 'one woman show' considering
the fact senior members like you, are being pushed from pillar to post?
A: I may not describe it that way but what I could say is that she is
sometimes reckless and acts without proper consultation.
Q: What would you say are the major shortcomings of the PA?
A: You see the captain must set the pace. If this happens, other
things will fall in line. The main reason for the PA's failure is the non-professional
approach to governance, to put it in a nutshell. Governance is a serious business. It is
not a joke. I have practised as a lawyer for 20 years in Kandy. We took the entire day's
programme very seriously. We did work according to strict timing. We never kept people
waiting for hours.
Q: During the period you served as a minister, were you able to act freely or
were you stifled at every turn by the president?
A: I must say that I was given the freedom as a minister. I had no
problem with regard to that. I must concede that I was given the freedom. The president
never interfered in my work.
Q: Now that you have joined the UNP, have you planned to contest the
forthcoming elections?
A: Yes. I hope to contest from Gampola in the Kandy district. I am
sure there will be a shift of 10 to 15,000 votes after I start to campaign. Because I have
practised as a lawyer for 20 years and I have been a member of SLFP since 1989 and I have
helped lot of people personally, irrespective of politics and I feel I could make a
difference.
Q: We understand that some 40,000 votes were stuffed during the last elections
in the Kandy district. You even admitted this fact, at a press conference last week. But
what did you do about it at that time?
A: We spoke against it. In fact, even the PA secretary D.M.Jayaratne
spoke against it. But nothing happened. In fact the worst thing is that as a result of
this kind of act, the Tamil member who contested who should have been elected, was not
elected. So this has severely affected the Tamil representation in parliament.
Mr.Rajaratnam should have been in parliament. But he was prevented from this because of
this fraud.
Q: If you were dissatisfied with the PA performance, why could you not at least
cross the floor along with nine other PA members who did so about two weeks ago?
A: I did not want to betray anybody. But I have been telling the
opposition leader that any time there will be a future election that I will be with
him.
Q: How do you feel joining a new party after having served one for more than 20
years?
A: As far as both PA and UNP are concerned, both parties have similar
policies. In the good old days one party followed socialism while the other followed the
market economy. But today there is hardly any difference. Both parties say they are for an
openeconomy. Ultimately governments are decided on the management of the economy during
that particular period. If the PA manages the economy better, the PA will be elected and
vice versa. It is the management that matters a lot and I think the UNP has a better
management team.
In 1994 we thought after the elections were over that Mrs. Sirimavo Bandaranaike will
be made the prime minister. So there was a coup there. Because Mrs. Bandaranaike was the
leader of PA, the SLFP and leader of the opposition. And we thought that she will be made
the prime minister. So under the constitution she should have been called to be the prime
minister. So in this party, from day one there has been conspiracy. It is true nobody took
up this matter later on because we did not want to rock the boat at the initial stage
itself. Chandrika did not even have the experience to take up that position. She was never
a member of parliament. She was never a minister. It is like being captain of a team
without playing with them.