The two decades after 1989 —the year the
Berlin Wall fell — is described by some as
the 20 years of Capitalism. And next year
will mark the commencement of the third
decade with global capitalism having hit
rock bottom— zero point or thereabouts. To
Vladimir Putin the former Russian president
and now the prime minister, the collapse of
the Soviet Union marked by the fall of the
Berlin Wall was the ‘Greatest geopolitical
catastrophe of the 20th Century’. To others
it has been a remarkable development with
the people in Russia and other republics of
the former Soviet Union being freed from the
dictatorship of the Communist Party, most of
them becoming independent republics. Ten
Eastern and Central European countries have
joined Western Europe and over the two
decades attained fast rates of economic
growth. Resultant economic woes and other
problems such as unemployment was the price
paid for the freedom of the people, it is
claimed
Great expectations
Great were the expectations of many
outside the Socialist countries—though not
necessarily of diplomats and many socialist
leaders— at the end of the Cold War.
Disarmament would free billions of dollars
for the betterment of humanity particularly
of the developing world. Poverty stricken
Asian, African and Latin American masses
expected the billions that were diverted to
armaments would be used for the alleviation
of poverty. The age old dream of converting
guns into butter was revived. But that did
not happen. Instead the belief of Nazi
Leader Josef Goebbels seems to hold on: Guns
will make us more powerful, butter only make
us fat.
There are few or no hopes for a better
world in 2009—at least economically. The new
American President Barack Obama will
commence his term of office next January
with a budget deficit projected at one
trillion dollars whereas his predecessor
George Bush inherited a comfortable budget
surplus.
Obama’s woes
America the most powerful economy in the
world is staggering on is feet. So are its
allies in Western Europe and Japan. China,
India and Brazil—the emergent economies— are
dependent on American and European markets
for their products and even though China
with its huge domestic market could cushion
a part of the impact millions will be thrown
out of employment. Poor countries in Asia
and Africa will not feel the full impact of
the global financial meltdown because the
great majority of the poor people are
dependent on subsistence agriculture but the
middle classes that have acquired tastes of
western consumerism will feel the pinch.
The alarming feature about the current
financial crisis no one is certain of when
or how the end of the crisis would come
about. There are many pundits who can say
what went wrong and what could be done.
Unbridled greed to make money, lack of
regulatory controls, removal of checks and
balances are attributed causes. Infusion of
billions and even trillions of dollars into
failed financial and industrial institutions
is now under way but none say when these
infusions can resuscitate the economy.
To a layman this financial rescue
operation looks like a patient on an
operating table with the world’s best
surgeons around but none are certain about
what could cure the patient.
Political analysts point out that deamnds
on Barack Obama by his own Democratic Party
will be great, the party having been out of
office for eight years. But Obama’s main
task will be to patch up the deteriorating
economy, Millions are being thrown out of
employment, businesses and industries are
closing down. It is certainly an unenviable
position for a new president to be in.
Foreign policy challenges
In foreign policy Obama has to end the
two wars commenced by George Bush. Pull out
of American troops without the basic
objectives of the reasons going in being
fulfilled will not be to the liking of the
American public. And now on his plate will
be the Mumbai terrorist massacre with the
two American allies Pakistan and India at
logger heads. Pakistan is a too strategic
and faithful ally to be ignored while India
now the centre piece of American strategy
created by the outgoing president cannot be
given less priority than Pakistan.
Meanwhile there are immediate global
issues such as globalisation, global warming
and international terrorism that demand
attention. However Obama’s priority would be
the financial crisis. It is quite apparent
that he would stand or fall on how he fares
in tackling this issue.
The global crisis is converging on Obama.
All countries, big and small are waiting
what his decisions would be.
The year 2008 has been described as a
‘traumatic year’. 2009 could well be
financial graveyard for capitalism just as
much 1998 was a graveyard for Communism.