SEVANAGALA: Tailor-Made For UNP Financier?
Strange bedfellows: Fonseka, Sarath Silva and Daya Gamage- “Gamage Effectively got it for free”
- 5-Member TEC had 3 Political Appointees
By Faraz Shauketaly

Strange bedfellows – Sarath Fonseka, Sarath N. Silva, Ranil Wickremasinghe and Daya Gamage at an Election Rally in Ampara (Picture by Wasantha Chandrapala)
A perfectly profitable state owned and managed enterprise was handed over on a platter breaking established norms and robbing the people – was the claim made by government Minister and MP for Moneragala, Jagath Pushpa Kumara.
An examination of the figures would indicate that despite being comfortable financially the management of Sevenagala Sugar had plenty to desire.
However grandiose the plans of the Ranil Wickremesinghe may have been in 2002 the entire privatization process was flawed: the TEC comprised of a majority of political appointees and none with any specialist knowledge of the industry. To add to the woes, the valuation used was one obtained from a private bank which valued the business controversially lower.
The bidding process saw four offers: in order of values received, Seasongrow Holdings Ltd. Rs 762.3 Million; Daya Apparel Exports / Xiangnan Luo Rs 550 Million; Distilleries Company of Sri Lanka Ltd. Rs 451.2 Million and Master Divers Pvt Ltd. Rs 78.1 Million.
Seasongrow Holdings was disqualified as their bid bond proposal did not conform to the Request For Proposal (RFP), Distilleries and Master Divers being discounted as they were lower than the Daya Apparels / Xiangnan Luo combine who promised to pay the full price on implementation – all Rs 550 Million.
The Technical Evaluation Committee comprised three political appointees – Deepal Gunaratna as Chairman of the TEC, Irwin Weerakkody, Suddhantha Amaratunga – with the Additional Secretary and the Treasury Representative completing the Committee of five. None of the political appointees had any specialist expertise of the industry and certainly no one from the Sugar cane Research sector.
A closer examination of the books reveal that at the time Daya Apparels made their successful bid, the Sevenagala Sugar Company had a sum of Rs 307 Million on fixed deposit and a stock of Sugar and Spirits of around Rs 150 Million plus various creditors of Rs 120 Million. In essence the Daya Apparel Xiangnan Luo combine walked into a financial bonanza of Rs 577 Million as opposed to their offer of Rs 550 Million. They in fact, netted Rs 27 Million! In parlance used in the Hotel Developers / Hilton Colombo matter, a “windfall profit” of Rs 27 Million on the day of completion. All they probably needed was probably a “bridging finance” facility to complete the transaction. Sources connected to this government claimed that this was at a time when companies and individuals connected to Daya Apparel were noted as ‘defaulters’ by the banking authorities. This claim however has been dismissed as untrue.
The Sunday Leader was unable to independently verify the accuracy of this claim due to rules on banking confidentiality. The fact remains however that with the help of Seylan Bank and Sampath Bank the Daya Apparel / Xiannan Luo combine completed the transaction. If the claim of being a defaulter has any truth it raises the question as to how the Daya Apparel application for funding passed through the Risk Assessment Committee within the banks.
The Government valuer had placed a value of Rs 1.2 Billion on the business – using what was later called the fixed assets basis of valuation – whilst the private bank had placed a value of Rs 481 Million – using yet another methodology. Clearly if the arithmetic was done in this manner, Daya Apparel and their partners generated a so-called windfall profit of not just Rs 27 Million but more in the region of Rs 470 – 500 Million. A case study for genuine public interest litigators indeed.
Compounding matters is the production figures for a company whose primary aim was to at the least maintain the output to collectively generate a production of sugar to reflect at least 12% of Sri Lanka’s consumption of sugar. Again the plan failed to materialize: in 2000, it showed a profit of Rs 115 Million and was responsible for 12% of the sugar consumed. In 2011 between the two sugar companies – Sevenagala and Pelwatte Sugar – the figure was a disappointing and vexatious 4 percent of Sri Lanka’s consumption. Government sources say this was definitely ‘under-performance.’
In addition to the financial bonanza that the new owners of Sevenagala received was a large and valuable fleet of vehicles – both heavy equipment and light vehicles. It really does lead one to wonder why the government did not merely call for a proposal from ‘Expert Managers’ as opposed to divesting 90 percent of what is arguably a very sweet essential item for the public.
The conundrum that is “Sevenagala Sugar” is further intoxicated when one considers the production of Spirits and Molasses over the period that Daya Apparel operated the factory as majority shareholders:
The income from the production of sugar continued to remain rather static within a band of Rs 347 – 652 Million, almost as though the company existed in the main to produce Spirits. Income from Spirits displayed strong growth starting with Rs 112.2 Million and ending up in Year 2008 with Rs 701.9 Million.
Daya Gamage is acknowledged by all – and he would be the first to admit it – as being a dominant force when it comes to financing the United National Party. He certainly fell out of favour with President Mahinda Rajapaksa. One viewing the other as suspect personified and the other piqued by Gamage’s support of the UNP leadership especially after all the contracts that were awarded to the Daya Group during the period Mahinda Rajapaksa was in charge of the Highways Ministry. Perhaps his most controversial moment came during the 2010 Presidential Elections. At a meeting in Ampara, Daya Gamage was seen hob-nobbing with Sarath Fonseka, Sarath N. Silva and Ranil Wickremasinghe and photographed acknowledging the crowds from a stage.
Daya Gamage has maintained that the ‘Expropriation Bill 2011” is unreasonable and draconian. He has indicated that he may go to an international tribunal to seek redress and assured the media that ‘no Minister can make me a beggar’.
As forceful as Daya Gamage is in his belief of his rights is the belief of the Minister of Economic Development who also maintains that the business was under performing and was engaged in other businesses ignoring the core business. Therefore, “not in the national interest”.
(faraz@thesundayleader.lk)
Daya Gamage’s Response
“ I do not wish to go into too many specifics as there are various matters pending. However I would like to state that Sevanagala Sugar was a loss making institution when we took over and we have proudly turned it around and today as a privately held company is worth at least Rs 4.5 Billion.
If we had taken it to the Stock Market and obtained a listing, the company would be worth at least Rs 10 Billion. The accounts of Sevanagala Sugar confirms the profitability.
Additionally I would like to say that both my wife and I are tax payers and have created plenty of opportunities for others. I would like to ask of the Ministers who speak about me even using parliamentary privilege, how many of these Ministers are tax payers?
I can guess that I may well be amongst the top 100 tax payers in this country. If the company did not pay income tax what was the Income Tax department doing? Whether we produced mainly sugar or a combination of Sugar and Spirits, the company created opportunities for the government to collect a significant amount of taxes and duties, which they did. I do not agree that in any way, Sevanagala Sugar was ‘under performing’. Actually it was profitable. Further as a Buddhist I did not cause the production of liquor at any time.”–
Questions posed to Gamage
We asked the face behind Daya Apparel Exports for his comments on the following specific areas.
On the composition of the TEC…
“was it fair that the TEC had 3-members who were political appointees?”
On the allegations that Rs 307 Million in Fixed Deposits and other Creditors meant there was a Rs 577 Million bonanza to walk into?
That you had a ‘windfall’ profit of anything between Rs 27 Million and Rs 500 Million.
That Sugar revenue remained rather staid whilst the contentious Spirits maintained strong growth.
On the (non) payment of Income Tax as opposed to excise duties on alcohol.









The more pertinent question to probe is what was the current Treasury Secretary Dr. P.B. Jayasundera’s role in this whole sordid affair of selling state assets for a song? Was he not the head of PERC, the institution responsible for giving away these state assets for a song to chosen entrepreneurs? One should scrutinize all of the deals done during Dr. Jayasundera’s tenure as PERC chairman during the UNP Government during the 2001 to 2003 period, where he was given the plum job of doing all of the privatizations by none other than Milinda Morogoda, and perhaps the investigative journalists at Leader should probe every deal and transaction valuations done by Dr. Jayasundera as head of PERC and whether or not Sevanagala and many others named in the recent re acquisition list were not undervalued and passed on by him to his chosen group? Another question to ask is who is this Tuly Cooray he has appointed to managed more than half the institutions named in the Bill? Is he also not another past associate of Dr. Jayasundera, and an ex JAF lobbyist? Time to ask the right questions and probe the pertinent facts…as the true nature of these deals will only emerge then.
Surelt, it is wrong to for a sugar manufacturer to produce liquor for the sake of more profits. No need to be a rocket scientist to understand this. .
They all come in different colors and sizes, in 1977 this breed of plunders of the people’s wealth were born and their population is increasing faster than that of misquotes. They call all these robberies “DEALS”. Thanks to this piece of legislature the general public may benefit as we may see tit for tat takeovers in the future with every change of party/ government.
We should be reserve Deal Place, Colombo 3 for all this type of business houses.
Today we have Expressways been built that cost of Rs. 1000 Million a Kilometer where the Lane widths are 0.3 Meters less than the accepted industry standards.
It’s the same difference.
Wow, Faraz, another shocker of an article! Bloody amazing job! I always wondered what is this noise about this man and this so called Sugar factory. Thank you for the exposure!
“the Sevenagala Sugar Company had a sum of Rs 307 Million on fixed deposit and a stock of Sugar and Spirits of around Rs 150 Million plus various creditors of Rs 120 Million. ”
If they had 120M creditors then the net value should be ((307+150)-120) = 337M.
Creditors are the people whom the company owe money for the goods and services provided. Debtors are the people who owe us money.
Not sure the author of this article knows the difference between creditors and debtors?? It seems like author is trying to highlight debtors but instead use the term ‘Creditors’.
If that the case, this article only reveals one side of the story – one side of the balance sheet. How much money company owed to outsiders at the time of acquisition? How did they stock on hand??
When acquire a company, you don’t just look at only these figures. It is a package of everything; fixed assets, machinery, maintenance cost, supply chain, competition and the market.
However, in sri lanka privatization business runs by politicians. they sell public assets to their family and friends under the name of privatization at a lower price. It happened yesterday and is happening today.
At the bottom of everey national evil, Ranil is there strangely. What a political sinner he is. His repyment of gratitude to his biggest financier is a chunk from the National weallth valued at Rs.570 million.Excellent gratitude. Who cares when Ranil cares not for the Nation but his perks. Surly his parents would have not cast his true horoscope when he was bon
You should clearly mentioned that there were 03 politically appointed members at that time.
What about the current scenario? NOW IT IS ONE MAN SHOW OF POLITICAL.
Be creative rather than just saying…..
Has the person written this article ever valued a company in her life or ant idea of corporate finance. First of all no one values a company on its assests. It usually done on cash flows and growth prospects and risks.
Has the author any idea of how a DCF or multiples valuation is done ? Why should some one over pay for an acquisition when one he has out bid his competitiors
In any event which transaction in the world does the buyer agree with the sellers valuation.
Merely, because there is cash does not mean it reflects the value. Did check the liablitiies, re-investment needs in working capital or the capital expenditure required.
Any event, the price he paid well justified given the expropriation risk that is seen now. In value he paid is reflected in the discount rate he used to discount the future cash flows of the company. Did you consider the cost of debt at that time or fact that the discount rate would also have to adjusted for political risk associted with investing in Sri Lanka