Some Issues Concerning Accountability

By Surendra Ajit Rupasinghe

Has the UNP ever been held accountable for crimes against humanity?

There is a tendency  to isolate  issues and incidents, and to treat them as separate projects, which does harm to the need to hold the State, the various regimes and all parties accountable for all crimes and violations connected with extra-legal killings, abductions and enforced disappearances. It is only then that we can work towards achieving a united  Sri Lanka governed by a democratic State. The blood and tears of the past have to be wiped clean, if we are to plant the seeds of a new future.  I shall take the recent “protest” meeting that was conducted by the “Freedom Platform” inside the auditorium of the J. R. Jayawardene Center which focused on the assassination of Lasantha Wickrematunge.
The daylight assassination of Lasantha within a high security zone and the brazen cover up by the regime is certainly to be held up as a concentration of the whole issue of accountability. This is reinforced by the fact that any and all witnesses and evidence proving culpability have been silenced and buried, and none indicted – even after three years. While it is important to keep the issue of Lasantha’s assassination and the abject and willful lack of accountability on the burner, it is important to place this issue in the context of the whole range of such abuses and violations. Lasantha himself would have wanted it this way. After all, he was killed because of his exemplary courage and determination in exposing such gross abuses and violations by whomever, without regard to party affiliation or official position, or on whichever side of the barricade they were.
It is also pitiful that Ranil Wickremesinghe should be given the platform to speak against the assassination of Lasantha and the cover up. This gives the UNP the opportunity to wash its hands off grotesque violations such as those which occurred on “Black July”, which included the government-sponsored massacre of 53 Tamil political prisoners kept in maximum custody, and the acts of  wholesale murder, looting and arson committed against innocent Tamil civilians. Has the UNP ever accounted for these crimes, and asked for forgiveness as a way of bringing reconciliation? Mahinda Rajapaksa would be very happy and comfortable if Ranil is to take up the case of Lasantha or any other, since Ranil could be trusted to deflect and bury the whole issue – partners in crime as they are!
At the same time, isolating the issue takes the focus away from the murder of Joseph Pararajasingham, Nadarajah Raviraj, Sivaram, 17 humanitarian aid workers, five Tamil students  and others, and the abduction of Prageeth Eknaligoda, Lalith Weeraraj, Kugan and many others. The “protest’ meeting could have been held under the theme: “In the name of all those killed, abducted and disappeared and to hold all accountable in the eyes of the world”. But, then Ranil would not have been able to mount the platform.
The whole war crimes issue also falls into the same game by limiting the issue to crimes committed by both sides during the final stage of the war.  What about the horrendous crimes committed by both sides during the war? What about the killing of Bhikkus at Arantalawa, the massacre at the Sri Maha Bodiya, the killing of 600 policemen who had been ordered to surrender? These are violations of international humanitarian and human rights law. Whatever the cause of liberation, they are crimes against humanity. What about the repeated, government-sponsored anti-Tamil pogroms beginning in 1958, including Black July, the rigging of the Jaffna DDC election and the subsequent burning of the Jaffna library, which may constitute a form of cultural genocide?  What about the carpet bombing of Tamil areas, as in Sampur and Iranamadu? What about the razing of burial grounds? What about the inhuman torture carried out in detention camps, the targeting of kovils and schools?
The war crimes issue has its own merit. But it should not cover up the train of horrendous crimes committed during the war, and the whole process of violent subjugation and suppression of the Tamil nation that led to the war.
Has the Mahinda Rajapakse regime accounted for any of these crimes against humanity, and asked for forgiveness? It is only when there is a fundamental and comprehensive process of accountability that there can be a democratic transformation of the State leading to  genuine reconciliation, and we can greet the new dawn of freedom and democracy.

5 Comments for “Some Issues Concerning Accountability”

  1. raj

    Ranil and UNP keep quiet on Lasantha’s murder inquiry. He should show leadership at least in Lasantha’s murder case. He is scared of showing leadership due to many reasons. Either he is afraid to speak the truth or he ignore it by considering it is not an important issues.

  2. kolakotiya

    Excellent article by Surendra.
    Ranil thinks all Sri lankans are fools and they have forgotten all extra Judicial killings of his time.

  3. Nimal

    It was late JRJ who was the main leader responsible for the Black July riots and in Prof AJ Wilson’s book he has quoted the only politicians living at the moment and responsible for the black July riots are Ranil Wickramasinghe and John Amaratunga. I still cannot think why JRJ and the government at that time was not quick enough to impose curfew and save the innocent Tamils.

  4. APPUHAMY

    He can’t speak properly because he sounds like his mouth is full of sponge or something.

  5. Appuhamy Sir, have you not heard some thing called ” SHORT TONGUE ” it is very common among all men & women, its not a serious deformity, u can notice while they talk only. Our friend RW is not having an egg or cotton ball in his mouth, next time you meet him look carefully his mouth while you talk to him.

Leave a Reply

Photo Gallery

Log in | Designed by Gabfire themes

Switch to our mobile site