The Sunday Leader

A Triumphal-March To A Mythical Past

“…for a myth does not analyse or solve problems. It represents them as already analysed and solved…”
Edward Said (Orientalism)

By Tisaranee Gunasekara

In the collective memory of the Sinhala South, the past was a happy country, a place where all Lankans lived in amity and harmony. Vellupillai Pirapaharan spoilt it all by igniting a war out of nothing.
Three years after the victorious ending of the Eelam War, Sri Lanka is busy returning to that mythical past. The lessons a people learn from history depends on the history they remember and believe in.
For many Sinhalese, 1956 was not when the Pandora’s Box was opened; it was a moment of liberation. Believing this, we see no need to ask ourselves why we clamoured for ‘Sinhala Only’, if our objective was to enhance our independence by ousting the language of the colonial-oppressor from its place of primacy.
The ‘Sinhala Only’ demand was propelled by the power-hunger and opportunism of politicians. But it became hegemonic because a Sinhala majority did believe that Ceylon/Lanka was a Sinhala-Buddhist country and that racial/religious minorities were guests without inalienable rights.  Sinhala failure to understand that Tamils too can feel passionately about their language and that no one likes to be a second class citizen in his/her motherland exacerbated matters.
‘Sinhala Only’ sowed the first seeds of the long Eelam War. It also deprived many Sinhalese of an opportunity of learning an international language. Mired in parochialism, they became an easy prey for right and left extremisms.  Now, more than 50 years later, the political legatees of 1956 are sending the crème de crème of the descendents of the Pancha Maha Balavegaya to military camps to learn English and table etiquette!
Extremism can be self-defeating and ludicrously so.
The past we hasten to return to was a country which made its Tamils feel like undesirable-aliens. Some tried to fit in, some migrated and others protested, peacefully, democratically and legally.
The Sinhala establishment, drunk on political triumphalism, responded with indifference, ridicule and violence.  Our idealised past was the country which taught Tamils that peaceful methods do not work and convinced them to take up arms. And turned Vellupillai Pirapaharan from a boy who killed birds into a history-making leader.
If the past was the happy country of our memory, the LTTE would not have come into being; and Mr. Pirapaharan would have ended his days as a smuggler (or some other social-misfit) unknown to history.
Vellupillai Pirapaharan was a true child of the political culture of incomprehension and intolerance. He began with ‘Tamil Only’, thereby marginalising and antagonising the other component of the ‘Tamil speaking people’ the Muslims; instead of creating Tamil-Muslim unity, he opted for ethnic cleansing, presenting the embattled Lankan state with a valuable ally.
He followed this with a ‘North First’ policy which led to an unprecedented schism in the Tiger monolith. He also launched murderous attacks on non/anti-Tiger Tamils; the victims of his bloody drive for domination included the best minds and the most courageous fighters produced by his community.
If the LTTE did not resort to murdering political opponents, suicide bombings and child proscription, the Tiger would not have become a banned species in so many Western countries. If the LTTE did not kill Rajiv Gandhi, it would not have earned for itself the costly enmity of Delhi.
Like Sinhala Supremacists, pro-LTTE Tamils (especially of the Diaspora) dream of returning to their own version of a glorious past, when the Tiger reigned supreme. But for Tamils too, a retrogressive project will be a self-defeating one. The Tiger country may be a place littered with many triumphs, but its eventual end was on the shores of the Nandikadal lagoon.
The past was not a good place, for any of us. If we return to it, we will find neither peace nor harmony; only mistrust, fear and renewed conflict.

A Sinhala Peace
Three years ago, the triumvirate consisting of Mahinda and Gotabaya Rajapaksa and General Sarath Fonseka led the Lankan Forces to an outstanding victory. Equating Tamils with Tigers was the premise on which the government fought the war.
Equating Tamils with the LTTE is the basis on which it is building peace. So, almost 300,000 Tamils were incarcerated in open prisons, masquerading as welfare villages. So, the North and parts of the East are being run like de facto occupied territoriesPerhaps nothing symbolises this iniquitous peace than the criminalising of mourning for the Tamil war-dead. Had that ban been limited to Mr. Pirpaharan and a few other leading Tigers, it would have made political sense; but it is a universal prohibition and applies to all Tamils except those killed by the LTTE. Most civilian Tamils would have a family member or a friend one who belonged to the LTTE and died in its service.
Many civilian Tamils were also killed during the war. Imposing a universal ban on mourning the Tamil war-dead is an act of psychological cruelty and political inanity which cannot but obstruct reconciliation. If the ethnic conflict had a casus belli, it was the imposition of the Sinhala language on Tamils. According to TNA parliamentarian M. A. Sumanthiran, Tamil Government Agents (GA) are being transferred out of the North and East to be replaced by Sinhala nationals who do not know Tamil.
For instance, the GA of Vavuniya has been transferred. “This follows the appointment of the GA Mannar. We protested. We have consistently protested that the GA Trincomalee is a person who has no proficiency in Tamil…” (Colombo Telegraph – 14.5.2012).
The critical absence of a political solution plus petty-minded attempts to impose the majority language and religion on the minorities: the past is almost here.
The 13th and the 17th Amendments were the most important progressive-democratic constitutional measures since Independence. The former was imposed on us by India while the latter was a home-grown measure. Today the 17th Amendment has been turned into a dead-letter by its anti-democratic antithesis, the 18th Amendment. The 13th Amendment is alive simply because of Rajapaksa’s fears about Indian/Western reactions.  So, grandstanding apart, home-grown solutions are non-starters. After all the Rajapaksas belong to the Sinhala supremacist camp which wrecked every attempt at a ‘home-grown solution’ from 1956 to 1987, thereby paving the way for the birth and predominance of the Tiger.  The Tiger in turn helped resurrect the Sinhala supremacist project by ensuring the victory of Mahinda Rajapaksa via its boycott of the 2005 Presidential polls.  The Rajapaksa determination to impose a Sinhala peace on the Tamils can cause a reactive-revival of Tamil extremism. By providing the Ruling Siblings with a handy enemy/scapegoat, it will help the Dynastic Project. Last week several state agencies announced, in rapid succession, the implementation of various pro-democratic measures. These were obviously aimed at the crucial Washington meeting between the Lankan Foreign Minister and the US Secretary of State. If Gen. Fonseka receives the presidential pardon he was denied repeatedly, that too will be in part due to the Rajapaksa need to pacify the Americans politically and, if possible, to win a counter-concessions on Iranian oil purchases.  In the absence of a broad Sinhala-Tamil-Muslim unity (which is pro-devolution/democratic/poor) in the oppositional space, is foreign pressure the only really-existing-impediment to our heedless march to a deadly past?

11 Comments for “A Triumphal-March To A Mythical Past”

  1. Hadeniya

    A brilliant analysis. The problem is that the 1956 “Sinhala Only” policy has ensured that not only Tamils, but Sinhalese too, have been deprived of acquiring sufficient English language proficiency to comprehend excellent articles such as this and engage in a constructive dialogue on matters of national importance.

  2. Sri

    Modayas never learn any lessons. That is why they are modayas!

  3. ronali

    Very good article. Wonder whether the legislators read these types of articles. Surely the advisors of these so called leaders would be reading this !! I hope. These so called libarators or the leaders must act and act fast. You Tissaranee has been crying, and crying aloud, hope they listen, at least for this country sake. Good on you. Keep the good work and and as always done by you keep it clean’.
    If I may please add, in the last 2 decades or so , the Ceylon Moor community has been addressed as Muslim, I am not sure whether the politicians are doing this or the Moor’s themselves are doing this to ensure security (not getting beaten).
    Playing religious cards especially a Islamic card will open doors for another international problem, which Sri Lanka does not need, Hope common sense prevail.

  4. Manjula

    If north and East MUST have a “proficiently” tamil speaking people in government service, then the same rule must be applied to the rest of the country. ie, All government servants in the rest of the country MUST be “proficiently” speaking Sinhala language. That means many tamil public servants who are currently serving the south (who are not highly proficient in Sinhala) will have no job. Is this the logic proposed by Thisaranee?

  5. paths

    There is nothing mythical about the past; Singalese r Dravidians speaking a language which is a fusion of Tamil, Sanscript & Pali. They may have Malayala blood as seen by the so called Kandyan saree which is what the Malayala fisher folk wear.
    The whole of SL was Dravidian as it was once linked to South India until rising tide separated SL as an island. The Singalese r Budhists but Budhism is a phylosophy not a religion. That is why they pray Pillayar, Skanda & Pathini.
    If there should be a peaceful SL where Tamils & Singalese live amicably, these common features must be brote out to the people. There was never a Singala New Year- it was just copied from Hindu New Year. The New Year ‘ganu thunu’ is copied from the Tamil custom of ‘Kai Vishesham’.
    High time we forget the LTTE; President & military r talking of a reemergence of LTTE to keep their seats warm.
    Justice & fairplay to the Tamils where they feel they r not 2nd class citizens wil make them feel they r Sri Lankans & then they will contribute to economic development.
    Otherwise LTTE wil reemerge.
    Devolved power to a merged N&East to include police & land & a system of govt akin to what one finds in India wil go a long way towards peace & tranquility in the Island.

  6. Sangaralingham

    world is changing society is one by virtue of our past we stick to one and same life principle not willing to change. jealosy greed competition hunger for power lack of common courtesy to your neighbour country men women lead to conflict terrorism war social disharmony so on so on now someone one want to glorify it and perpetuate it. reorganise rethink forget the past change habits manners line of thought afterall srilanks is tiny place easy to target for criticism in and out.

  7. Appuhamy

    Sri Lanka does not have a “Sinhala South” or “Tamil North” or “Muslim East” – Sri Lanka is for all Sri Lankans of all ethnicities and religions. Let ALL Sri Lankans live in any part of Sri Lanka whatever ethnic backgroyund they belong to. The racist “Thesawalami” law must be abolished and ALL Sri Lankans must be allowed to purchase land and live in Jaffna – just like any other place in Sri Lanka.

  8. San

    Well written facts. If everybody in the island thinks in this way there will definitely a solution for all our problems.

  9. Herby Padmaperuma.

    Tissaranee your languae is flowery, lucid and your facility of expression and thought are s remakably fabulous. But regretfully as a afithful and avid reader of Thisaranee Gunasekera,I am inclined to feel pardon me if I am wrong, whether your surname is is GunsekerAM, becuase your writings more than often betray and appear to be so vehemently pro Tamil and manifestly anti Sihala. Additionly for what personall reason we do not know, but you seem to entertain an unqualified antagonism and an intense dislike and a strong aversion to the Rjapaksha Clan in general, and as they represent Sinhlese and Buddhist icons, to you phychologically reject what you do not like and therefore are ,aversed to Buddhism, Sinalese and even the country Sri Lanka .That is why very unfortunately we find ou making often elements of unptriotic references to Mother Sri Lanka. Someof my associates suggested you must be an NGO planted, paid and mainied by them at the Sunday Leader,to dissimulate a SL Stafeer
    With your journalistic acumen, skills in the knowledge of politics and geneneral governance, be reasonably aggressive but not unfairly vindictive. Sri lanka needs audaciosus but ethnically unbiased Flag bearers Sri Lanka Flag bearers like you.

  10. P.Riyad

    If not for 1956, the vast majority of non-English speaking section of the population were destined to lead lives in the backwoods whilst the few, very very few, westernised elite ruled the roost and enjoyed the all the perks. If the 1956 election did not give them a place in the sun, a mass uprising would have..with disastrous results. Quoting papers unknown newspapers like the Colombo Telegraph etc., has no value since these are opinions of those who do not contribute to the progress of the country.

  11. Ram2009

    Gunasekera is intent on creating new myths. Sri Lanka was happy and content for long periods, but there were periods when the invasions from India made existence precarious for the leaders of the county. There is no doubt that both Tamil and Sinhala speaking people on the whole lived in harmony at other times and that there were Tamil speaking generals in the armies over long periods serving the king.
    The President should not give in to blackmail to grant special privileges to people speaking Tamil or any other minority group for that matter, but equality under law is a must.

Comments are closed

Photo Gallery

Log in | Designed by Gabfire themes

Switch to our mobile site