The Sunday Leader

Muslims Of Sri Lanka Or In Sri Lanka?

By Imaad Majeed

Former advisor on Muslim issues to the Howard government in Australia, Dr Ameer Ali is a graduate of the University of Ceylon who went on to read for a Master of Philosophy from the London School of Economics and obtained his PhD from the University of Western Australia with a thesis on the religious precepts and economic practices of the Muslim community in Sri Lanka.

Dr Ali is of the opinion that Muslims have played pragmatic politics in the past by joining national parties and have achieved political gains for their community. However, he regards the advent of the Sri Lanka Muslim Council (SLMC) as unnecessary and counterproductive. Speaking to The Sunday Leader, Dr Ali claimed with conviction, “Ethnic politics is the bane of this country”.

“The SLMC came out with a religious cry,” he said, “This was evidenced by their first leader M.H.M. Ashroff shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ at the opening of political rallies. It is a political abuse of religion when the name of God becomes a rallying point”.

According to Dr Ali, the Tamil National Alliance, the Bodu Bala Sena and the SLMC are one and the same. “They are all playing petty politics with ethnicity,” he claimed.

“If the Muslims of Sri Lanka feel that injustices have been committed against them, such as the incident at the Grandpass mosque, they must appeal to the magnanimity of the majority,” he suggested, “We must go behind the Buddhists intellectuals who are critical of the troublemakers, instead of going behind Muslim politicians.”

On the issue of communal tensions created by militant Buddhist monks, Dr Ali asked “Where has the compassionate Buddha gone? Where is the magnanimity that Dutugemunu had for Elara?”

No religion should ever be a state religion. A constitution must be secular with secular laws. “The time has come to rethink the role of language and religion in our constitution,” he added.

The problem that Sri Lanka faces is that its intellectuals, few and far between, are going for political correctness and are mute on the matter of fundamentalism. To this, Dr Ali responded, “The State must protect all views.

We have to develop critical minds. Note that our religious examinations always ask questions of what, when, where but never why. We would not need madrasas if religion was thought in a critical manner in school. Madrasas only breed competitive religiosity. The only way to stimulate individuality is to encourage critical thinking. Let one thousand flowers bloom and let those who question the paradigm come together”.

Ethnic authenticity

During the course of our conversation, it became increasingly pertinent to address the issue of ethnicity and the authenticity of the ethnic marker of Sri Lankan Moor. According to Dr Ali, the Sri Lankan Moor is a superficial identity, superimposed by the Portuguese. “It is an epithet bestowed by the Portuguese – not with love, but to denigrate a community which they hated,” Amir Ali said.”

“The Portuguese were zealots. They were against Islam. With the fall of Spain, they looked down upon Muslims,” he added, “For the sake of convenience they called any Muslim they met in the Indian subcontinent as Moors”.

This matter of the ethnic marker was not taken up seriously until the 1880s when legislative councillor Ponnambalam Ramanathan wrote an article about the Sri Lankan Moors that claimed that they were of Tamil origin. “He had a political agenda to say that,” Dr Ali noted.

“It was a time at which the colonial government was considering giving representation for Muslims in the legislature. In order to sabotage this, he argued that the Moors were Tamils. The Muslims of the Colombo elite, at the time, realized that if they did not abolish this idea, they would lose representation. So, they took on the identity of Moors as opposed to Tamils. This is how the Muslims of Sri Lanka came to embrace this identity.”

Of or in Sri Lanka?

After the 1970s, with the employment opportunities in the Middle East and the rise of the Petrodollar Arab countries, the Wahabi interpretation of Islam came to the fore. “We were once an integrated Indianised Muslim,” he said, “Now this integration is being questioned. Looking at our dress and the way we behave, we are being questioned as to whether we are Muslims of Sri Lanka or, simply, residing in Sri Lanka.”

This change can be seen in the attire of the Muslims. The burqa and the niqab – covering all but the eyes – were not existent in the 1970s. At the time, Muslim women wore saris and covered their heads. “In what sense are they any less Muslim than those who are covering their whole bodies today?” he asked, “Why has the externality taken priority over the internal change that is the spirit of the Quran?”

According to Dr Ali, the Muslim of today is obsessed with the outward form of Islam. “Islam never instructs its followers to separate themselves from their neighbours. It says to be respectful of others, as only God is judge. We are too insular a community and we are dissociating ourselves by planting date palms in Katankudy,” he noted, “That only reinforces this idea that we are non-native to Sri Lanka. We are alienating ourselves”.

“I receive complaints from my non-Muslim friends that Sri Lankan Muslims are not amiable. They are hesitant to visit a non-Muslim house, and when they do, they ask if the food they are being served is Halal,” he observed, “The most conservative Muslim folks are against participating in the festivities of non-Muslims. I challenge that. I do not have to drink and eat haram foods to partake in festivities”.

“I am not saying that we should avoid the restriction of Halal as it refers to food over which the name of God has been mentioned,” he clarified, “The question of the Halal controversy in this country does not question the name of God, it questions the manner in which animals are slaughtered. I have seen butchers drag animals and beat them. They are shivering! Anyone would question whether to consumer this product. This torture is haram! Hindus and Buddhist do not want to see meat displayed on the roadside”.

Towards a humanist Islamism

The most conservative and rigid teachings of Islamic law derive from a confusion between the fikhr and Shariah. The term Shariah occurs only once in the Quran, and it is in the sense of morals, not law. The fikhr or regulations are man-made. “We are confusing the terrestrial with the celestial,” he said, “The fikhr can be adapted and changed. We have failed to contextualize the Quran and textualize the context”.

Dr Ali recalled that in the 9th and 12th centuries, the Mu’tazilites, the rationalist Islamic scholars, borrowed heavily from Greek philosophy. “Ibn-al-Arabi was known in the Muslim world as the ‘second teacher’, begging the question of who was the first teacher,” he noted, “It was Aristotle”.

The Muslims took from the Greeks, enriched their philosophy and gave it back to them. Not long after that, orthodoxy reigned supreme and suppressed the intellectual movement. According to Dr Ali, the Muslim world has not produced a single worthy intellectual scholar since that time.

“Conservatism and rigidity cannot bring peace to the world. They are trying to create a New World Order,” he claimed, “What is the position of Christians and Jews in this Islamic worldview? They are protected minorities. What is the position of Hindus and Buddhists? They are kafirs against whom we must wage war”.

History, in the eyes of the Muslim, has been frozen after the fourth caliph, and, thus, Dr Ali urged that we go back to the humanist movement in Islam. “We cannot continue to fear God. We must love God. That is the message of the Sufis that the Wahabis so hate,” he added, “There is a story of Rabiah of Basri, the first female mystic, carrying a fiery torch in one hand and a bowl of water in the other. When asked why, she said that she wanted to burn heaven and put out the fire in hell”.

The Islamist is unwilling to tolerate differing views, he noted, but who is to judge which way is right? Today, Muslims are living in a parallel society and that is creating tension all over the world. “The fault exists in the way we educate our children,” he claimed, “They are being indoctrinated, not educated”.

While the Quran states that it is the book for those who think, the conservative Islamists state that questioning is the devil’s work. And, so, those who come up with new ideas are persecuted as apostates. “This is what has happened to Bassam Tibi and Amina Rasul. Laila Bakhtiar, who wrote The Sublime Quran, questioned whether a husband can beat his wife and she has been condemned,” he added.

The uprisings in the Middle East have been hijacked by religious politics. The revolution started by the youth was hijacked by the Muslim Brotherhood and has led to a totalitarian state in Egypt. This is the vested interest of the US, to protect the centre of their world.

The Prophet sought an egalitarian society that provided justice for all. He saw a majority suppressed by the rich. Today, some of the worst poverty in the world is in Islamic states. Just look at Bangladesh, Pakistan and Yemen. We have given too much importance to the rituals and forgotten about the spirit of jihad.

Politics of intolerance

“In Sri Lanka, there is prejudice between the Tawheed and Tablighi sects. The Tablighi Jamaat is concerned about the hereafter, not this world, but how can this be so – religion is for the living, not the dead!” he exclaimed. In a geo-political sense, according to Dr Ali, this intolerance is dangerous.

“It is a totalitarian political ideology that religious bodies such as the Jamaat and Ulaama spread when there is no room for dissent,” he noted, “While the Jamaat must be given credit for filling our mosques and ridding them of the social evils such as drunk Muslims walking in like in the 70s, they should not be allowed to give political guidance.

The Ulaama is an unelected body that is trying to dictate to everybody, and, in turn, they are being used by politicians. We are a minority and yet we asking the majority to tolerate the intolerant”.
Towards the end of our conversation, we tried to look at how Muslim culture is represented within Sri Lanka’s national culture, and found very little to point to. “Why don’t Muslims take part in the Peraheras?” he asked “Do we have no cultural contributions?”

“Why can’t we hoist the national flag at every mosque?” he asked, and recalled that it was the Muslim politician A. Sinnalebbe who proposed that the flag be hoisted at Parliament in 1948. Dr Ali urged that mosques cease to call azhan in urban settlements, citing this as the cause for bana to be amplified.

“The Muslims of Sri Lanka must take the example of the Jews in Europe and America,” he said, “They participate in society, invest carefully and contribute intellectually. What have we contributed?”


19 Comments for “Muslims Of Sri Lanka Or In Sri Lanka?”

  1. Jayamaha

    Muslim countries do not allow a single Buddhist temple. In Sri Lanka they have built 20000 mosques.
    They dont have any regard for Buddhism. They are nothing but enemies of the state

    • Paraviya

      Jaramaha, do not throw poison like this. The Muslim Countries you are referring do not have minorities . There are many Muslim Countries with minorities like Sri Lanka and those countries have All kinds of Temples and Churches.
      Have you counted 20000 mosques. In my small village alone there are over 20000 statues. .

      • Banda

        You may count one million statues including ones in shops, that is not a factor here. There is a difference between a statue and a mosque. How come those Muslim countries don’t have a minority. You people pride yourselves in calling a country 100% Muslim. You will not do that in srilanka.

  2. Reza

    Dr Ameer Ali is praeching his understanding of Islaam and quoting IbnuArabi and Aristotle, but for Buddishts asks where is the compassionate of Buddha. If he preaches for Buddhists to follow buddha its only fair for muslims to follow Muhammad. Dr is trying to demonise the muslims who want to follow islaam as muhammad preached and be Sri Lankans too. both can go hand in hand. bynthe earliar comment by Mr Jayamaha you are serving your hidden masters to put 2 communities against each other, who have lived in harmony for morenthan 1000 years. Dr you can learn by reading the book 1000 years of ethnic harmony by Dr Lorna Devaraja.

  3. Chammika

    I totally agree the comment of Jayamaha. Even I too found muslims doesn’t have any regard on other religions. We Sri lankan Buddhists and we are the majority citizens of Sri Lanka and these muslim minority people pretend that they are the most religious and richest people in the country. Those are all rubbish. Minority people should live in respect depending the countries they live. For an example, if we live in a country in the middle east, can we live the way muslims live in our country…? We will have to undergo with many harassment and difficulties when we live with muslims. I don’t blame every muslims are having this bad habit, but comparing to the others, 80% of muslims have this bad attitude.

    I totally disagree with the comment made by Dr Ali, “No religion should ever be a state religion.”

    Is respecting and following this method in their countries…??

    Sri Lanka is a Buddhist Country and nobody can interfere with the religions and the cultures within the state of Sri Lanka.

    • Banda

      Very correct, Muslims are getting segregated as a alien community in the planet. Different garb, halal food. In future they would only be able to mingle or live with Muslims alone. As Dr Ali says they wore sari and covered only the head in the past now they think Sri Lanka is another mid. East country. If they don’t belong here they must go and live in those countries it is pointless bringing date trees here and try to grow them to change the geography. They should be educated by some one like Dr. Ali. He is wrong in saying srilanka is not a Buddhist country. It is and no one can change that. Srilankans are not hostile to any religion as long as they respect the notion that srilanka is a Buddhist country. Bodubala sena has come as an answer to the hostile acts of other religions but we do not approve it. If others respect Buddhist country, bodubala sena would die a natural death.

  4. ninian silva

    This writer is in a different planet. He must be sleeping most of the time. He is out of touch with the World leave alone Sri Lanka. What is Al Queda & Taliban preaching – Islamic politics. SLMC has democratically elected members declaring Islamic principles. This chap is promoting Islamic terrorism in Sri Lanka pitting Muslims against Buddhists by comparing BBS, Sinhala Ravaya. He is a genuine out of touch chap or a Fundamentalist promoter of Islam. We need to hunt this chap down!

    • Ninian Silva. You don’t read between the lines. Mr. Ameer Ali is a ‘Saampradaayika Muslim’ as identified by the BBS and is liked by the BBS as opposed to the ‘Fundamentalist Muslim. So please don’t try to make an enemy out of your friend.
      Mr. Ameer Ali is on your side.

  5. Aruna

    Sri Lanka is a Sinhala Buddhist country so as Saudi Arabia is a Muslim country.

  6. tomsamusa

    Eelam state will be a secular nation.

  7. Shihan Cooray

    Middle East Countries no minority religion, such as Saudi,Qatar, Oman etc only Islam is the religion but non Muslim only allow to work and earn and not been granted with citizenship. Why do we always compare our country with those counties. we should not do that, we have to compare Countries like Tunisia, Morocco , Malaysia, Egypt & some Africa Countries, these countries allowed citizenship regardless the religion and therefore they have Temples, Church, Mosques & Koviles etc. We too allow 1000 years back for the Muslims to Settle in our Country, who came from Morocco mainly. That is why we call them as ” Marakala”. Now they are Part of our countries citizens. we should not grant citizenship at that point and tagged our country as Buddhist Country , Lode Buddha bone in India but they too did not tagged as Buddhist Country since they allow to reside different religions. Sri Lankan Muslims are different from any others, they love our Nation and help to get Independence as well as to irradiate terrorism, So let them live in our country and will discuss similarities than the differences.

    • NIyas

      Look at Indonesia, Malaysia … there are enough temples and Churches flourish … Middle east countries are exclusively a labour market .. go and make your wealth and get back … no taxes are levied for your earnings … even Muslims are treated the same manner. Major part of our economy is dependent on their money … which is not only the salaries … other businesses such as exports, airlines, oil imports … etc ec .. Charity is another area where you got to appreciate. Many major road, bridges, schools, hospitals are funded by middle east govts. More than this we always got support against Northern terrorists form these regions … and votes against war crimes charges … So why are Muslims bad for you … Mr Ameer Ali is simply expressing his view which in view not the right view in the context of Sri LAnkan Muslims. Religion is a private affair .. our dress and beliefs are personal. There is nothing wrong in seeking halal food which we consider as healthy. Food becomes halal by treating the animal in the most humane way. I agree with Mr Ali on this point.

  8. niyaz

    Dr Ameer Ali has a few points to ponder but some others are far from reality. In the world there are many different examples of religious mixtures in different societies. Some have maintained strict single religious societies over hundreds of years whilst others have various levels of tolerences. Problems will always occur when such systems are tried to be changed. In SriLanka the available material suggests a high degree of acceptance of all religions during the rule of the Kings and a system of a great different religious prevelance during colonial rule. Any attempt to change this need to be done with utmost caution after much discussion.

  9. Mohideen

    who is this joker. Dont think he was an adviser for the Howard Govt,

  10. Shahnaz

    @ Mohideen, you may be a joker, you have to honour the learnerd. I totally agree with Dr. Ali. Today most of our muslims are more obsessed with the outward form of Islam and not with inner. This only has created problems in our country. I lived in a muslim village and a sinhalese town, I still remember how my uncle talks of how they helped in the Wesak Celebration this was in in 1970′s, I hope this still continues! As Dr. Ali has mentioned Conservatism and rigidity cannot bring peace to the world. We have to learn to respect every individual, as how we want us to be treated and respected. The same way we have to respect all religions.

  11. Nakeeb

    Dr Ameer Ali is certainly expressing his frustration on the intolerant attitude of Sri Lankan Muslims which is the major cause for not integrating with the main stream Buddhist majority. He has given similar interviews to the Australian media expressing his frustration on the Muslims of Australia for not integrating with the rest of the Australian communities. It is worldwide phenomenon that modern Muslims have become more indoctrinated and attracted toward the religion due to the insecurity and persecution perpetrated against them in the pretext of war against terrorism. Sri Lanka is no exception. Immediately after the war against LTTE was won the extremist elements are now turning their attention towards the Muslim minority. More these elements press for liberalization of their doctrine among the Muslims more they would stick to the fundamental aspects of the religion. To break the impasse we should look few hundred years back and understand how the amicable co-existence prevailed between the Buddhists and Muslims, one community respecting the other in their religious observances, exchanging gifts and food during their festivals, caring their neighbors irrespective of their religious identity, contributing toward the charitable establishments of the other community and so on. Counting the no. of mosques and statues or the type of dresses worn by the other community will further sow the seeds of discordance between the two communities.


    Dr, Ameer Ali,
    You are talking “poppycock”
    Without knowing what Islam is and the ground situation here,please do not
    confuse the people.
    To be decent,I will tell you. just “piss-off”
    You refer to Tawheed and Thableegh. as. two. sects.
    Tawheed is. Monotheism and Thableegh is a Deviant Sect.
    Poke your P.Hd. etc. up. your arse.
    Return to. Australia and practice whatever religion you claim to profess.
    We have enough Advisors.

  13. Raja

    This is an excellent analysis of the different sects in Sri Lanka and in particular amongst the Muslims.
    Thank you Mr Majeed for sharing your views. Unfortunately, there will be people with narrow views, looking at your article with tinted glasses and not wanting to see the truth trying to convey in order to promote co-existence and living the day, rather than living for tomorrow under dogmatic beliefs.

Comments are closed

Photo Gallery

Log in | Designed by Gabfire themes, pub-1795470547300847, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0