The Sunday Leader

Defeating The Demons Of Our Past

by Wimalanath Weeraratne

Zeid Ra’ad Zeid al-Hussein

We will not allow anyone to do whatever they want in collaboration with Prince Zeid Ra’ad Zeid al-Hussein of Jordan,” said a firebrand parliamentarian Namal Rajapaksa at a meeting held in Lunugamvehera. Addressing a public meeting in Kurunegala, former president and Kurunegala  District MP Mahinda Rajapaksa too expressed  views similar to that of his son, on the arrival of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to Sri Lanka. “Prince Hussein has come here and is looking for evidence,” shouted the one-time President at the top of his lungs, noting that had the war was still raging, his second son, Sri Lanka Navy Lieutenant Yoshitha Rajapaksa would not have been behind bars! “None of us would have any trouble and none of us would be hauled before Commissions,” he stressed.

Unfortunately, Sri Lanka has had to be led with Statesmen of that caliber. Those who would spread any falsehood or fabricated lie for his or her political survival. Of the public, handful who make any financial mileage from supporting such politicos, back them for their own petty gains.


Taking Prince Al-Hussein

MP Namal Rajapaksa has no understanding of diplomatic protocol and is more or less a chip of the old block. Making ludicrous allegations that the present United National Front for Good Governance (UNFGG) is taking the people for a ride and is hell bent on taking political revenge, he too goes around the country just like his father. Just like a drowning man will clutch at a straw, Rajapaksa too has now clung on to the Buddhist monks. In a way both Rajapaksas engaging in bankrupt, short-term politics is beneficial for the country, as they would not have a long term shot in dragging the country into  a darker stage, than what it was during the Rajapaksa regime.

The latest gimmick to be launched by them is the one million signature petition launched coinciding with Prince Hussein’s visit to Sri Lanka. In a time when even the soldiers who fought in the last lap of the 30 years of bloody civil war do not come forward to make such claims; the Rajapaksas have made this their latest project as their ‘last straw’. In my view, no other group in this country uses and misuses issues and problems of the general public like the chauvinists.

“They are trying to hold war crimes probes against war heroes who sacrificed their limbs and lives to safeguard the territorial integrity of this country during last 30 years’ bloody civil war,” states former Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa. This is completely false. That is not what Prince Hussain expressed during his visit.


A moment of strength

According to the Prince there are many myths and misconceptions about the resolution and its impact on Sri Lanka. “The Human Rights Council resolution is not an attempt to interfere in or undermine the country’s sovereignty or independence. The decision by the government to co-sponsor the resolution was not a moment of weakness but a moment of strength,” he claimed stating that he hoped to see Sri Lanka reach great heights.

“This has been a much friendlier, cooperative and encouraging visit than the one my predecessor endured in August 2013, which as you may recall was marred by vituperative attacks on her integrity, simply because she addressed a number of burning human rights issues that any High Commissioner for Human Rights would have raised at that time.

“I am aware that some of the same people have given me a similar welcome — I’ve seen the posters — but I am pleased that in the new environment in Sri Lanka, all voices, including the moderate voices of civil society, can at last be heard, even if sometimes the voices of hatred and bigotry are still shouting the loudest, and as a result are perhaps being listened to more than they deserve.

“Sri Lanka has come a long way in the past year, as you, the media, are only too aware — given the much greater freedom you now have to write what you wish to write, and report what you feel you should report. The element of fear has considerably diminished, at least in Colombo and the South. In the North and the East, it has mutated but, sadly, still exists.

“Virtually everyone agrees there has been progress, although opinions differ markedly about the extent of that progress. The ‘white van’ abductions that operated outside all norms of law and order, and — as intended — instilled fear in the hearts of journalists, human rights defenders and others who dared criticize the government or State security institutions, are now very seldom reported. The number of torture complaints has been reduced but new cases continue to emerge — as two recent reports, detailing some disturbing alleged cases that occurred in 2015, have shown — and police all too often continue to resort to violence and excessive force.”


National anthem

Several recent highly symbolic steps have been taken that have had a positive impact on inter-communal relations, including the decision taken to sing the national anthem in both Sinhala and Tamil on Independence Day for the first time since the early 1950s. The following day, in a reciprocal gesture, the Chief Minister of the Northern Province paid a respectful visit to a Buddhist temple in Jaffna. In January, the President pardoned the convicted LTTE prisoner who once plotted to assassinate him. These are significant steps on the path of reconciliation between these two communities, both of which bear their own deep scars from the years of conflict. I was pleased to learn that some major inter communal events are planned in the North and East to bring together large numbers of young people from all across Sri Lanka. In both provinces, the Governors are now civilians, which is another key improvement.

One of the most important long-term achievements over the past year has been the restoration of the legitimacy and independence of Sri Lanka’s Human Rights Commission. The appointment of new leadership of great integrity, through the proper constitutional process, offers a new start to revitalize this all-important national institution. I hope the government will now swiftly provide it with the resources, and above all the institutional respect it needs, to enable it to fulfill its great potential, not only to provide human rights protection for all Sri Lankans, but also to offer expert advice on laws and policies from a human rights perspective.

Despite these advances — and others I have not mentioned — after nearly 30 years of conflict and acrimony, that not only cost tens of thousands of lives but also eroded so many vital components of the State, Sri Lanka is still in the early stages of renewal.

Distracted by this conflict, Sri Lanka has also failed to address critical issues facing women, people with disabilities, people with different sexual orientations, and other groups suffering discrimination such as the Plantation Tamils in Central Sri Lanka. I hope that these and other neglected or discriminated-against groups and minorities will now receive the attention they deserve, not least in the constitutional reform process.

Repairing the damage done by a protracted conflict is a task of enormous complexity, and the early years are crucial. If mistakes are made, or significant problems are downplayed or ignored during the first few years, they become progressively harder to sort out as time goes by. While the glass is still molten, if you are quick and skilful, you can shape it into a fine object that will last for years. Once it starts to harden in misshapen form, it becomes more and more difficult to rectify. Likewise if any of the four key elements of post conflict resolution — truth-telling, accountability, reparations and institutional reform — are neglected or mishandled, unresolved resentments will fester, new strains will emerge, and a tremendous opportunity to establish long-term stability, which in turn should result in greater prosperity, will be lost.

In the case of Sri Lanka, large parts of the country have been physically, politically, socially and economically separated from each other to a greater or lesser degree for much of the past three decades, and the effort to rebuild trust in the State, and between communities, will take years of political courage, determination and skilled coordination and planning.


Constitutional reform

While there is much support for the very important proposed Constitutional reform, which should ensure that the rights of all Sri Lankans are fully recognized, there are also fears that at a later stage this may be achieved at the expense of other equally important processes such as truth-telling, justice and accountability.

While the Task Force appointed to lead the National Consultation process includes high quality representatives of civil society, there are concerns — including among the Task Force members themselves — that the process is too rushed and has not been properly planned or adequately resourced.

There are some measures that could be taken quickly which would reverse this trend of draining confidence. First of all, the military needs to accelerate the return of land it has seized and is still holding to its rightful owners. In parallel, the size of the military force in the North and the East can be reduced to a level that is less intrusive and intimidating, as a first step in security sector reform. The government must also quickly find a formula to charge or release the remaining security-related detainees.


HRC resolution

The Human Rights Council  (HRC) resolution, and the comprehensive report on which it was based, and which it endorsed, aim to promote reconciliation, accountability and human rights. The release of the report, and the ensuing resolution, unleashed a great surge of hope that finally we were all turning the corner in terms of starting to fully recognize what happened during the final years of Sri Lanka’s hugely corrosive and tragic conflict.

The Human Rights Council resolution was in many ways a reflection of the reform agenda that Sri Lankans had voted for in last year’s presidential and parliamentary elections. It sets out some of the tough steps that must be taken to achieve reconciliation and accountability and, through them, lasting peace.

There are many myths and misconceptions about the resolution, and what it means for Sri Lanka. It is not a gratuitous attempt to interfere with or undermine the country’s sovereignty or independence. It is not some quasi-colonial act by some nebulous foreign power.

The acceptance of the resolution was a moment of strength, not weakness, by Sri Lanka. It was the country’s commitments to both itself and to the world to confront the past honestly, and by doing that, take out comprehensive insurance against any future devastating outbreak of inter communal tensions and conflict.

The world wants Sri Lanka to be a success story. It has seen the opportunity for lasting success in Sri Lanka, and that is why it has invested so much time and energy into providing that pathway laid down in last October’s Human Rights Council resolution.

I urge all Sri Lankans to make an effort to understand what that resolution and the report underpinning it actually say, and I urge all those in a position to do so, to make a greater effort to explain why the recommendations are so important, and why the United Nations and all those individual States — Sri Lanka included — endorsed them. Then perhaps the siren voices, who wish to undermine all reforms, all attempts to provide justice, accountability and reconciliation, will get less traction. The people who are trying to undermine confidence in these crucial initiatives are playing a game that is endangering the future peace and stability of this country.

For a country to be stable, to be a success, it needs to have a strong, impartial and credible justice system. The security services and the judiciary must function in the interests of all its citizens. It was in these areas, that the country’s key institutions were seriously corroded and corrupted during three decades of conflict and human rights violations, including through its reliance on the draconian Prevention of Terrorism Act and other emergency powers. It is the integrity of these institutions, which depends on having the trust of the population, that the international community is trying hard to help Sri Lanka restore through the implementation of the recommendations contained in the report and in the resolution.

It is for these reasons that the report and the Human Rights Council resolution suggest international participation in the accountability mechanisms set up to deal with international crimes and gross human rights violations committed by individuals on both sides.

This is a practical proposal to solve the very real and practical problems I mentioned earlier. But it is only one aspect — albeit a very important one — of the broad range of measures outlined in the 2015 UN report and resolution, and the extent to which it has been allowed to dominate the debate in Sri Lanka in recent days is unfortunate. Extreme nationalistic tendencies lay at the heart of Sri Lanka’s conflict, and they should not be allowed to undermine the country’s long term chances of recovery once again.


Joint opposition

Only a year ago, large numbers of Sri Lankans voted for change, for reconciliation, for truth, for justice. It would be a great shame if a minority of extreme voices — on both sides — who are bent on disruption, were allowed to prevail by creating fear where there should be hope. Sri Lanka needs a serious debate about these very serious issues, on which its future depends. This needs to start with a thorough, frank and honest discussion of the detailed findings of the September 2015 UN report, as it is important that all Sri Lankans rally behind the process and better understand the point of view of all the victims on all sides.

“Let me make it as plain as I can: the international community wants to welcome Sri Lanka back into its fold without any lingering reservations. It wants to help Sri Lanka become an economic powerhouse.

It wants Sri Lanka’s armed forces to face up to the stain on their reputation, so that they can once again play a constructive role in international peace-keeping operations, and command the full respect that so many of their members deserve.

“But for all that to come to fruition, Sri Lanka must confront and defeat the demons of its past. It must create institutions that work, and ensure accountability. It must seize the great opportunity it currently has to provide all its people with truth, justice, security and prosperity.

I, for my part, will do all in my power to help that come about, and will continue to offer the services of my Office to accompany Sri Lanka through this very difficult process, the Prince highlighted.


5 Comments for “Defeating The Demons Of Our Past”

  1. raj

    Actually, the government should have investigated Gothabaya Rajapaksa and Mahinda Rajapaksa to find out if any of them ever gave directed forces to shell hospitals and other civilian targets including no-fire zone. Unfortunately, the government is not in a position to do that because it may cost the government politically. Because of that, Sri Lanka should allow international inquiry rather than local inquiry.

    • sam-boy

      I think it was a big mistake by Mahinda Rajapakse govt to have finished the war,
      Looks like we have more problems than during that period. Big Big Mistake should have just gone with the flow like all the previous governments

  2. Just Society

    Thanks. Its clear Prince Zeid loves the progress made to date in Sri Lanka thus having an opportunity to become a full-pledged nation among the nations.

    After several race riots within the interim Malaysian Federation, Singapore declared itself independent in 1965. Having witnessed the descending nature of the Ceylonese model, Lee Kuan Yew learnt that linguistic rights are important and enshrined it. This was when institutionalised discrimination was continuing in full swing in Malaysia. It paid handsomely for him; Singapore became an envy of the developed and developing nations.

    Immigrants from Jaffna was holding high posts and was making the country prosperous doing their part being equal citizen.

    Meanwhile, in their native soil, due to majority/minority boondoggle, Ceylon/Sri Lanka gravitated from a proud country to a pariah state in the last 70 years until the dawn on January 8, 2015.

    Unless there is a steady hand is there at the steering wheel, it can easily degenerate to a decrapitated one as the forces of evil are at continuous play in the guise of bankrupt racist thinking.

    Both Prabhakaran and Mahinda were necessary to instil introspective analysis to walk away from this self destructive phenomenon and “ for all that to come to fruition, Sri Lanka must confront and defeat the demons of its past” as Prince Zeid stated.

    May the trio be blessed with strong mind and health to achieve same.

  3. sri

    The last but one para says it all. Can the new State face up to its responsibilities is the question. Breathing hot and cold is not the answer but honesty and integrity are called for to break out of the vicious past.

  4. punchinilame

    With all this logical analysis, SL has the biggest challenge of framing a new
    Constitution, which task depends on the curse on this Island – racial politics !
    By the time, with due Justice when those found guilty are locked-up, the
    actual Change envisaged by the majority citizens can be achieved.. The undue
    noise now is from the corrupt and guilty only and not from patriotic Sri Lankans?

Comments are closed

Photo Gallery

Log in | Designed by Gabfire themes