![]() 22nd September 2002, Volume 9, Issue 10 |
|||||
Home |
Lost
and found "Give
me back my baby or I will die" By Ranee
Mohamed On the day of
the kite
festival, Sunday, September 15, Anusha Geethanjali's most precious thing drifted away
from her. Her little son, barely two years of age got lost . It has torn
this young woman's heart into shreds and her life seems to be just hanging
in there. Little
Madushan whose only perennial request
in his tender life was for a
little sip of her breast milk drifted away without his last feed which she
could not give because there were too many people around. And it is among
those people that her baby wandered and never came back. At house no.
211/81, Nagalam Vidiya, Colombo 14, is a lane that is crowded with people,
ironically it seems to have more little children than adults. Some ran
around their mothers, others clung on to them more urgently, clenching
their little fists around old clothes. But walk further down, and all one
can hear is crying, moaning and pleas to the unknown by a family of
adults. "Give us
back our child wails a mother, grandmother and her sister. The telephone
keeps ringing. But nobody is calling with good news. They are calls
inquiring whether they found their baby. It is a story that will pull at
the heartstrings of the strongest. It is any mother's nightmare. Losing a
child is hard to bear. Losing a baby, helpless,
hungry, tired and sick is even harder to bear. Little Madushan like
all babies needed his mother to cuddle upto. He is her only son, her only
baby. "Whoever
took my baby need not be frightened. I do not say that he was wearing gold
or had any precious possessions with him. I will not ask any questions.
Please come and keep my baby near my home, near by lane, near the police.
Or give me a telephone call and tell me where he is and I will come and
get him. I will not ask any questions. I will not take any action or do
any harm..." goes on Anusha her
hands outstretched in a desperate plea. Whoever took
this baby ought to know that what he needs most is his mother and the
warmth of their humble home. Little Dilanka Madushan's family is not rich.
"We are 'small' people," they describe themselves. But they did
have big plans for November
15, the second birthday of their only child. Anusha finds if
difficult to talk, but she is anxious to talk to the press and make a plea
to the nation. "Find my baby for me or I will die," she cries. "My baby
and I never wanted to go for this kite festival, but my husband insisted
that we go there. He seemed angry with me.
So in the evening around 7 I got my baby ready. He wet his pants
and I scolded him saying that we will get late and soon changed him and
left. We went in a three wheeler. When we reached there the kite festival
was over. But there were a crowd at Galle Face green. It was about 8. p.m.
My husband and I, and my brother's son and the son of a neighbour sat in a
circle and we all played with a big ball that we bought at Galle Face. My husband
bought us all icecream, but we did not give any to our son because he had
a bad cold. Then my son kept on begging me to give him some breast milk.
But as we could not give him breast milk there in the middle of Galle
Face, my husband said that he will buy him an ice cream. He took our baby
by his hand and walked toward the icecream vans. At the cement barrier
there my husband left him for a split second to pull the money out and buy
the ice cream. Anyway, when he had looked again, little Madushan had
disappeared.My husband came running to me and asked me whether I
had our son. We both panicked and started running all over looking
for our baby. But we could not find him," explained Anusha
Geethanjali in tears. When Madushan
walks his left hand remains folded. This is because his father had one day
lifted the baby from his hand. This is one way of identifying the baby. Thereafter
Anusha Geethanjali and her husband Susantha Jayalath spent the whole night
at Galle Face Green looking for their baby. They had run to the three
wheelers, asked the icecream sellers and finally gone to the police. It is time that
the police and the nation as a whole participated in this search, the
search for compassion for this family that lives by a lane heralded by a
bo tree. "We
believe in compassion. I believe in the Buddha dhamma. I spend my time in
meditation and the Lord Buddha has warned us of suffering in this life.
But this kind of suffering we just cannot bear," said Rohini. She is
praying. The whole family is busy going to soothsayers and giving poojas
at temples and prayers in churches. As we talk someone brings a thambilli (king coconut) and a yellow garland. They want to go to the
nearby kovil to make a vow. "We
have not harmed anybody. Why did they take our baby away," is their
tearful question. We also ought
to ask the frightening question: "For what did they take this baby
away?" There are many equally agonising answers. We have heard
stories of selling babies for
adoption, and even more gruesome stories of paedophiles, child porn and
organ robberies. For those who
believe in thinking, it is time to think. For those who believe in praying
it is time to pray and for those who believe in action, it is time to act.
As human beings
our thoughts ought to go to this little baby who may even at this moment
be crying for his mother. Perhaps we can spend half of this Sunday doing
something for this family in agony by looking out for Madushan who is
believed to be in the vicinity of the city of Colombo, perhaps in Slave
Island. We owe it to humanity to be on the lookout for this child. So, if we see a
strange baby in a childless family, a lost baby among foreigners, perhaps
a baby like Madushan in a hospital, we ought to look twice. For in that
way we may be able to relieve the heartbreak of a poor woman who has lost
her most precious possession. It is time we
opened our eyes to this touching story of two people who need each other
most, but whose bonding has been coldly ripped apart on the way to buy the
baby an icecream. Everybody says
that it is not nice to beg. But at this juncture we ought to beg the
people who took this baby away to please return Baby Madushan. Whoever took this baby ought to return him to his mother for that is where he belongs. I
do not want anything more in life... It was Thursday
morning. For
Anusha, it was another morning of tears after a sleepless miserable night.
"My throat was hurting, my head was dizzy and I was losing the will
to live," said Anusha, when the telephone call came. It was from an
unknown person in the vicinity of Veyangoda. The caller said that a baby
who looked like Madushan had been found by the police. The caller was a
parent who understood Anusha's agony. Anusha's first
reaction was to run crying to the first vehicle in sight. "Take me to
Veyangoda," she begged, tears of relief and joy streaming down her
face, washing away the tears of sadness that she had wept for four long
days and nights. And she had not eaten a square meal for four days. But
this morning she seemed ready to conquer the world. Full of energy, she
ran hither thither screaming. The only destination in her heart was
Veyangoda. At 10 a.m. the
family thronged into a van in a big hurry. It seemed as if they were going
to heaven. Such was their joy. Rohini, Anusha's mother was loud in her
emotions. If her faith in the Buddha dhamma was strong then, it was
stronger now. "I told you I have not harmed anybody. I knew that we
will get back our precious child," were her words of relief. From Grandpass
to Veyangoda they drove, Anusha crying all the way, anxious and impatient
to see her baby. OIC of the
Veyangoda police, IP S.B. Diyakelinawala least expected what began at
Galle Face Green in Colombo to climax in Veyangoda. But it is the way the
cookie crumbles. Life is full of strange quirks. When the
Veyangoda police received a telephone call from a youth in Katuwasgoda
that there was a child resembling Madushan in a house living with a father
and a mother, the police were quick to rush to the scene. The police team
led by OIC Diyakelinawala acted as fast as lightening. It is worth
mentioning that this team deserves the highest commendation. OIC
Diyakelinawala rushed to the scene with SI Dimbikotuwa, SI Indika, PC
17093 Jayaratna and P.C. 38665. On inquiries
made they found that the unhappy baby in the house was Madushan and the
man in the house was Madushan's father. The lady in the house however was
an alleged 'girl friend' of Madushan's father. It was later revealed that
the whole disappearance was staged. Madushan's father and his girlfriend
had acquired a house on rent in this area about a month ago. They had
prepared to bring this baby home because she did not have children. It has
been revealed that the whole operation was planned for over a month. Baby Madushan's
first greeting to his mother was 'amma' as he clung on to her breast for
the feed he had missed for four days. It was the most joyous bonding -
that of mother and baby. After over one and half years, it was as if he
was born again... He understood genuine grievances
Anuradhapura
Satyagraha was one of the
most memorable events of that period. The government alarmed by the
success of the UNP's political campaign banned the satyagraha. The order
banning the satyagraha was to be served on Mr. Jayewardene and Mr.
Premadasa as the leader and the deputy leader of the party. The price of
non-compliance included confiscation of property. We were all
staying at the Tissa Rest House the night before and we heard that the
police were going to come to the rest house to serve the banning order.
There was a discussion as to how to avoid it - I think it was held at a
nearby school. Finally Mr. Premadasa said that he is going to go somewhere
to avoid being served the banning order. So we left. Mr. Jayewardene and
his people remained behind and were given the order by the police that
evening. The problem
before us was how to keep Mr. Premadasa out of the reach of the police who
were on the look out for him. One of the high court judges in Anuradhapura
was a friend of mine (he is now deceased). His official bungalow was
within the sacred city. We kept Mr. Premadasa there till nightfall. But we
still had to go back to the rest- house to spend the night and we knew the
police would be waiting for us outside. Therefore the plan was to disguise
Mr. Premadasa. Accordingly we dressed him in a coat and a thalappawa and
brought him to the rest-house in the night in a car. The cops waiting
outside stopped the car but they did not recognise Mr. Premadasa.
Mr. Premadasa's
plan was to come to the venue of the satyagraha - the Ruwanweliseya - in
the morning at the appointed time and therefore he had to avoid being
served the ban. So he dressed himself like a person observing sil, all in
white and covered his head with a white cloth. The police were all over
the place, on the look out for him. But they did not recognise him. He
walked calmly up to the Ruwanweliseya, sat near a stone column and started
reading a book. The police were all around but they did not think that
this pilgrim and the Mr. Premadasa they were looking for were one and the
same person. Frankly if I did not see him getting into this costume I
would not have recognised him myself. It was a very
tense few minutes. We, his people, were walking around and hoping that
nothing would go wrong. I still remember how calm he was. Many of the
policemen were waiting close to me; SP Chandra Perera kept on coming and
talking to me; I think they knew that I would not be far away from Mr.
Premadasa. So there we were the police and the satyagrahis, all waiting
for Mr. Premadasa. As the appointed time approached I could see him
standing up and slowly moving towards the venue of the satyagraha. He was
playing his part so well that the policemen who were getting very anxious
still failed to spot him. So the plan succeeded and at the appointed time,
Mr. Premadasa was at the venue; he took off the white cloth on his head
and both the police and the satyagrahis recognised him. The police gave
him the order banning the satyagraha and he tore it up without even
reading it. It was a moment of triumph.
I remember
another interesting incident from that time. That was during the
by-election of Baddegama. The UNP's candidate was a man called Podi
Ralahamy who incidentally was the father of Franciscu of Southern
Provincial Council fame. We were supposed to address several meetings
during this campaign. One day we set off to Baddegama in my car and the
car broke down in Panadura. Then we called Colombo and got down Mr.
Premadasa's Morris Oxford; that also broke down closer to Baddegama. We
then managed to get a lift in a passing van. By the time we got to the
venue, the meeting was over. I remember Mr. Premadasa saying that luck was
against us in that election. And surprisingly enough we lost that
by-election. Believed in
grievances One of the main
themes of Mr. Premadasa's speeches during this period was the '71
insurrection. What he saw and heard during this period had a profound
impact on him. He believed in the genuine nature of the grievances of the
young people - as he did in the 1987-89 period. That was why after the
defeat of the second JVP insurgency, he appointed the youth commission to
go into the grievances and recommend remedial action. His problem on both
occasions was the method of struggle adopted by the young people. I
remember that the killing of Premawathie Manamperi was one of the
incidents that moved him deeply. That was why he was so reluctant to
unleash the armed forces on the JVP after he became president - because he
knew from the experience of '71 what would happen. As a result he did
everything he could to arrive at a negotiated solution, even to the point
of evading his responsibility as the elected leader of the country. He was
similarly sympathetic towards the young Tamil rebels, though there too he
did not agree with their methods. Contrary to what some people thought at
that time, he was never anti-Tamil. He could not have been, given his
background and the nature of his political base. Colombo Central had a
large Tamil population and the majority of these people were our
supporters. And unlike most Sinhala politicians Mr. Premadasa could speak
in Tamil. He understood
that these people had genuine grievances. He was opposed to
standardisation; he felt it was unnecessary, wrong and damaging. He also
felt it was unjust because it amounted to depriving many students with a
better claim of a chance to higher education. He was also opposed to the
post-1956 language policy. Perhaps he did not fully understand the dangers
of Sinhala Only initially. But very soon he realised how divisive and
dangerous it was. He used to say that this policy introduced ethnic
divisions right into the school system itself. That was why he used to
mention his experience at St. Joseph's of how children of different ethnic
groups used to study and play together. I remember he
had a great liking for Mr. S.J.V. Chelvanayagam. He felt that Mr.
Chelvanayagam was a leader who cared about his people. He was also very
friendly with Mr. Amirthalingam. Mr. Premadasa
believed that the best solution to the ethnic problem was a system of
grama rajya. He believed in autonomy, of the right of the people to decide
their own affairs. He believed in decentralisation down to very small
units. He felt that village councils and town councils were not viable
units and introduced the pradesheeya sabha system instead. He did not
believe in large units such as provincial or district councils because he
thought they led to concentration of power once again, away from the
people. To be continued next week LIFE
WITH EVE By Sonali
Samarasinghe Eleven
rules for life My sister makes
people take their shoes off. Before you
blanch, wait. Not when she meets them in the supermarket, but when she
encounters them on her doorstep, waiting eagerly to pop in. A Korean would
applaud her methods with cultural approval. Many a times
and oft as I walk out of the inner chambers, on my frequent weekend
overnighters in her home, I am surprised to find a motley group of visitors
blinking expectantly in the foyer. Waiting. In their naked feet, toes curled
inwards politely. Hail or
sunshine (and winter in Canberra lingers on for some nine months), before
the human perambulations on her spotless white carpet the footwear must come
off at the vestibule. Consider then the plight of one of my sister's good
friends from ole Blighty. A large
proportioned fella called Tom. Lives in the country most of his life but
makes occasional forays into the urban areas to visit a few friends in order
to partake of a hearty meal. Thus it is that he is often seen at my sis and
her hubby Ro's place. Nonetheless, protocol must be observed, as in the
courts of Mandalay in classical Burma. There, issues
of protocol often seemed more important than those of power and the Burmese,
(as much as the British who probably didn't like it at all) attached great
importance to the question of whether or not foreigners should wear shoes in
the presence of the king. In 1886 the
British may have conquered the proud court of Mandalay, but the
off-with-the-shoe habit never wore off. There was Tom on one such visit, as
if he were in Mandalay in 1885, taking his shoes off before entering sis
Indi's home. There he was, coyly peeling off his nethermost wear and
promptly standing on one foot. Silent
observer Then in a
surprise move, he danced for awhile on his tippy toes. Since we thought this
hopping around to be some quaint Scottish/Irish trot, or some preliminary
custom he might have picked up in the mother country on one of his rare
visits, we took no notice. However,It was hard to ignore that Tom, usually a
warm and vigorous conversationalist was rather silent throughout the social
event. A multitude of
about ten had gathered around to partake of the loaves and fishes but not
many words fell trippingly off the tongue of this proud Englishman. It was
harder to ignore the fact that he had curled his large left ankle rather
sadly around his right ankle and had tucked his left toes under his right
heel. When I tell you
that the man stands over six feet five in his socks and is more or less
built along the size of the Titanic you will no doubt begin to get an idea
of the enormity of his person. A visual image of such a man curling his
ankles around like a coquettish school girl, will enable you to understand a
little of the alarm a few of the more observant guests uneasily harboured in
their respective bosoms. I mean to say
it was bally ridiculous. But you can't very well tell a guest of yours to
stop playing with his feet. It would be rude and insensitive. In order to be
helpful, Ro announced loudly at intervals that the toilet was just around
the corner if anybody was interested. To no avail. Days later, Tom was to
confide in Ro, that his awkwardness at the dinner was due to the fact he had
a large hole in his sock and didn't want his toe sticking out like the great
white whale. Forwarded
messages But on to other
things. My dear old school friend and young doctor-in-the-house Sandy
forwarded to me an e-mail I thought was rather nifty and which I reproduce
below. When I spoke to her strongly about this habit of hers of frequently
sending me forwarded rather than personalised messages, she merely sent me
another forwarded message as to why forwarded messages are not so bad after
all. As she says,
it's not the content, it's the thought that counts. Fair enough. Here then
are eleven rules for life not taught in schools and listed by Bill Gates in
a speech to a high school in California. (1) Life is not fair - get used to
it (2) The world won't care about your self-esteem. The world will expect
you to accomplish something BEFORE you feel good about yourself. (3) You
will NOT make $40,000 a year right out of high school. You won't be a
vice-president with a car phone until you earn both. (4) If you think your
teacher is tough, wait till you get a boss. (5) Flipping burgers is not
beneath your dignity. Your grandparents had a different word for burger
flipping-they called it opportunity. (6) If you mess up, it's not your
parents' fault, so don't whine about your mistakes, learn from them. (7)
Before you were born, your parents weren't as boring as they are now. They got that
way from paying your bills, cleaning your clothes and listening to you talk
about how cool you are. So before you save the rain forest from the
parasites of your parents' generation, try delousing the closet in your own
room. (8) Your school may have done away with winners and losers, but life
has not. In some schools, they have abolished failing grades and they'll
give you the test as many times as you want to get the right answer. This
doesn't bear the slightest resemblance to ANYTHING in real life. (9) Life is
not divided into semesters. You don't get summers off and very few employers
are interested in helping you find yourself. Do that on your own time. (10)
Television is NOT real life. In real life people actually have to leave the
coffee shop and go to jobs. (11) Be nice to nerds. Chances are you'll end up
working for one. Handbook
for children: Silence is not always Golden By Shehara Samarasinghe When you are a
par-ent you will
un-derstand." How often do parents utter these words, in an attempt to
produce some sort of finality in an argument? There is no better way to
emerge triumphant from a disagreement than to put oneself on a superior
plane; one's opinions become revered facts and opposing voices are
diminished due to one's unassailable position. The use of such verbal
devices is not necessarily devious - after all, a parent can often see what
a child cannot -yet the ease with which parental superiority ends any
discussion is not always desirable. Judging
parenting skills How can
somebody who is not a parent, like myself, have the audacity to give parents
advice or indeed judge them on their parenting skills? Very easily, because
whilst everybody is not a parent, everybody is a child and the role of the
latter has been ignored for too long. Parents receive countless pieces of
advice on how to handle their enormous responsibility but children are
issued passive roles. They are told to listen, to behave, to conform and to
obey, although none of these commands will help them to become independent
individuals, which is no doubt what their parents wish. Last week I
discussed the issue of over-ambitious parents, of those who put too much
trust in 'parenting trends' instead of relying on their instincts. With high
expectations and a bursting timetable, a child's own desire to learn can be
hampered - it knows only how to copy and memorise. Most doctors agree that
50% of reading problems are the result of teaching children how to read too
early! Children are not normally ready to begin reading until they are six
and a half, around the time when they start getting permanent teeth, but
increasingly parents attempt to equip them with reading skills and basic
mathematical skills such as counting before they begin their schooling. If
forced before they are ready, children develop an aversion to these skills
and can be disadvantaged. Parents do all
of this with the right intentions. The days of 'laissez-faire' child rearing
are over. A 100 years ago families were large and households included the
extended family- grandparents, aunts, etc. The responsibility of raising
children was shared and often they were left to themselves. Nowadays, due to
greater economic security and the availability of birth control devices,
people marry later (usually at the end of their education process) and thus
they become parents later, when they are more cautious. Families are also
more compact than they used to be, meaning that parental efforts are
expended in a more concentrated manner.
Lop-sided
society The shift in
the composition of families is nowhere as visible as in China. The Chinese
government introduced its one-child policy in 1979 and generally, parents
wanted that one child to be a boy. The basic reasoning behind this is that
boys would grow up to support their families whereas girls would be taken
into their husbands' family, not to mention the dowry her parents would have
to cough up. The practice of either aborting female foetuses or killing baby
girls, common before 1979, has resulted in a highly unbalanced society:
there are 7.4 million single men aged 20-34 and only 454,000 single women in
that age bracket. In addition to this, those families that chose not to
murder their daughters obviously had no other children and thus lavished
upon them. Thus, a high percentage of these young women are comfortably
well-off and have received a college education while their numerous
(superfluous?) male counterparts are less well educated and of rural origin. The moral of
the story? Parenting is a difficult job that is complicated by the fact that
there are no fixed guidelines. What is acceptable in one culture appears
barbaric to another-like the disposing of baby girls - and even within one
culture the lines are blurred. Take the example of American David Peterson.
He was arrested and charged with assault for spanking his five-year-old
daughter because she slammed a car door on her brother's fingers. His
lawyers argued that a jury should decide the case rather than a judge, their
reasoning being that people belonging to the upper classes - like the judge
-cherished different beliefs about child rearing and were less likely to use
physical force as punishment than members of the lower classes. They claimed
that only a jury could decide on the conventions of child discipline
accepted by the community. Parenting is no
longer a natural ability. Indu
- The man within By
Marianne David From childhood,
his life has been a contradiction, a non-conformist, within a society that
can be suffocatingly conventional indeed - a state of affairs akin to where
the mind and the body operate on colliding wavelengths When you meet
Indu Dharmasena these days, he would look at you and smile in a very
friendly manner and say, "I'm on the way to realising my dream." From childhood,
his life has been a contradiction, a non-conformist, within a society that
can be suffocatingly conventional indeed - a state of affairs akin to where
the mind and the body operate on colliding wavelengths. Indu is
wonderful to talk to. Very open
and trusting, he has an almost no-holds-barred approach when it comes to
talking about his life and experiences. Living in a
time where drama was not taken seriously enough to dedicate your life to,
Indu went to London for three years and completed a degree in mathematics
and computer programming. "Drama was
not considered a career option at that time so I needed something to fall
back on," he says. His father's sudden death brought him back to Sri
Lanka. "I had a
happy childhood, I can't complain. I am much older than my brother and
sister. My parents produced a film so I suppose that made me want to write
too." Indu says his
parents were very encouraging. "They never told me not to do it, but
always encouraged me." A past pupil of
St. Bridget's Convent, Indu took his first steps into the world of drama
while still in school, where he acted in a play he wrote himself, for an
end-term concert. "I was
encouraged a lot by Yoland Abeyweera whom I consider my guru." Indu says that
he is the one who first started writing in "Singlish" in Sri Lanka
adding, "I started writing like that because that's the way we talk
anyway. I can see this style catching on a lot now." "I don't
really consider myself a writer. more an entertainer." At the
beginning Indu says he faced a lot of criticism because of his unique style.
"The 'English' scholars were not pleased with it but no one had the
guts to tell me that to my face. The people who were considered
well-established playwrights laughed at people who did not speak English
properly." In his last
play, Indu says he is taking a dig at people who do not speak Sinhalese
properly. Society's
reaction did not anger him, says Indu, adding that everything depends on the
audience and their taste and that he would not have continued if he had
gotten discouraged. "You can't expect everybody to like what you
do." He uses this
statement to sum up the negative vibes: A critic is like an eunuch - they
tell you how it should be done but cannot do it themselves. "Otherwise
they wouldn't be criticising - sour grapes." Indu also works
at an advertising firm where he directs TV commercials amongst other work,
and also does some skits for launches, which he finds very interesting. Describing
life, Indu says that while his life in public and private is "not
really different," there are "ups and downs" adding, "I
look forward to the future." "I am
happy with what I have," he says, continuing, "ambition is good
but I find that money motivates people a lot. As long as I have enough to
live and eat." About his
plays, Indu says that he enjoys doing them because, "you meet a lot of
people and when it comes to training younger people - something I guess I
learned through experience - drama gives them a lot of confidence." He explains
that though it is said sports encourages team spirit, he doesn't think so.
In a drama, he says, everyone has to work together, covering up mistakes,
giving prominence to the person who is supposed to take center stage and
sharing everything. "Sometimes
parents tell me their children were very shy before but after taking part in
a drama they seem to have blossomed." "I was at
Molly's recently and this boy walked up to me and thanked me for training
them saying they won because of me. When
things like that happen you feel like you've really done something." Indu says that
he has written 35 plays so far and says, "Sometimes I laugh and say
that if I don't die, I might compete with Shakespeare and write more than he
has." Of his dream,
he laughs and says, "to get an Oscar," but
quickly assures that it's just a joke and no serious ambition. "I don't
think there are dreams that can be achieved because when you write about
people, you tend to see through them." he trails off. "I'm
building a house in the gallery style with trees in the middle and the house
around. Finishing that is one of my dreams.
Maybe I would write a book about my life." he pauses again, and
continues enigmatically, "I do have a dream. I'm on my way to achieving
it." What that dream
is he would not elaborate, preferring to remain secretive. Maybe after all
these years, mind and body have united. Cricket
and babes - a merry combination By
Mandana Ismail Abeywickrema and Shezna Shums What do
international, professional cricketers
do in their spare time? Hop over to the Taj Samudara and be convinced that
they keep hitting. Not the ball,
though - in spare time, it so happens its
babe hitting. This phenomena
according to officials is nothing new and not unique only to Sri Lanka, as
it happens all over the world. Earlier, people were under the impression
that cricketers were more or less mobbed by teenage fans for autographs or a
glimpse of their heroes. It now
appears that the females hanging around areas frequented by cricketers
expect more than an autograph and in some cases actually receive what they
bargain for. There have been
several such incidents which have taken place during the ICC Champions
trophy in progress and needless to say, they were discarded as unconfirmed
reports. Speaking to The
Sunday Leader, a team official who wished to remain anonymous, explained
that there was an incident when a cricketer from a foreign team had brought
three girls to take to his room. The MSD officers present had not permitted
this player to take his gal pals. After throwing a tantrum, the player had
taken his 'friends' to another destination. The official went on to say that
a team manager of a foreign team too had done the same thing. The Sunday
Leader was informed by officials handling player arrangements, that after
4.30 in the evening, the lobby area of the hotel is swamped by girls -
looking for autographs and more. The girls'
presence and the inviting glances do not go unrecognised. More often than
not it is two way traffic. The Sunday
Leader witnessed an internationally recognised Sri Lankan bowler at his best
when he suggestively remarked, "Hi babe," to a 'sexily'
dressed girl. Giving the girl the top to bottom stare, our man was
not totally interested in bowling a maiden. And even female
journalists got a taste of things. Cricketers
from an African country asked a Leader journalist to go out partying at
night, while another came out with some suggestive remarks to another
journalist. When inquiries
were made from security officials as to whether there have been any reports
of cricketers taking those from the opposite sex to their rooms, they said
that it could not happen this time as the security was very high. Only the
players were allowed to go to their rooms and no one else even accompanied
by the players was permitted to enter the rooms. The Sunday
Leader spoke to an official from the MSD unit deployed at the hotel
premises. He said that the
officers are on duty 24 hours a day. This official said they have had
absolutely no problems with the cricketers or with them trying to take any
girls to their rooms. He stated that
there were many 'fans' that came to meet the cricketers, they took pictures
and got their autographs but that was it. When asked if
there were any faces that he noticed, who were all the time in the hotel or
trying to get close to a player he said there were no such cases and that he
didn't notice anybody or persons in particular who were hanging around the
hotel. All 12 teams
are in the same hotel so there are about 225 players and officials. The
MSD's denial however did not tally with The Sunday Leader's own experience. Former managers
of the Sri Lanka cricket team told The Sunday Leader that women and
cricketers go hand in hand. "It happens all over the world." They were
however quick to point out that the players themselves have come to realise
that if 'babe hitting' was to
get top priority, then it was their careers that were at stake. "They
themselves have realised that from 9 am to 6 pm they are doing a
professional job." One Sri Lankan star who found it impossible to sleep, came to realise that his body needed the rest if he were to become a top bracket player. He now makes sure that he gets sufficient sleep. |
|
|||
| ©Leader
Publication (Pvt) Ltd. 410/27, Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo 07 Tel : +94-75-365891,2 Fax : +94-75-365891 email : leader@sri.lanka.net |
|||||