|
Exploding
the cohabitation myth
By Suranimala
WITH D-day for the debate on the 19th Amendment to the
constitution fast approaching, President Chandrika Kumaratunga has
launched an offensive against the prime minister, finally sealing the
fate of cohabitation between the executive and the legislature.
That President Kumaratunga was out to sabotage the peace
process was obvious from the outset and proof of it came with the out
coup document, which Matara District MP, Mangala Samaraweera clumsily
misplaced, and which found its way to the media.
Boomerang
Apart from such manoeuvres, the president time and again
sought to upset the apple cart by firing salvos to Prime Minister Ranil
Wickremesinghe and Defence Minister Tilak Marapone on issues relating to
the peace process with the intention of whipping up public emotion,
which unfortunately for her had little impact.
With nothing working, Kumaratunga last week pulled out
what she probably thought was a rabbit out of her hat in the form of a
bribery allegation against Wickremesinghe, only to find the issue
boomerang.
For ministers of the calibre of Ravi Karunanayake,
Rajitha Senaratne, S.B., Dissanayake, G.L. Peiris and the like, the
president's statement was a virtual godsend, for it finally drove home
the point to the prime minister that any plans of cohabitation with
Kumaratunga was nothing short of lunacy.
If Prime Minister Wickremesinghe earned anything in his
political career spanning over 25 years, it was a reputation of being
Mr. Clean in his financial dealings and the president's bribery charge
in that context no doubt hit him in the gut and was understandably
furious. More so, coming from a president whose reputation when it came
to issues of corruption was equivalent to that of a skunk.
It will be recalled that the CEO of Evans International
in 1997 in writing accused President Kumaratunga of dishonest practices
and rather than sue the man, the government paid the company nearly Rs.
20 million in exchange of the allegation being withdrawn.
And mind you, in this instance her allegation was that Rs.
25,000 was solicited from her to admit son Vimukthi to Royal College and
her refusal saw the son being deprived of admission.
Thus, it finally dawned on the prime minister last week
that try as he might to work towards cohabitation by even stalling
investigations into the president's activities for the purpose of
getting Kumaratunga's support for the peace process, she was out to rock
the boat.
The president no doubt was also feeling that time was
running out for her with the 19th Amendment coming up for debate this
month, effectively curtailing her powers if successful and forcing an
election on her if unsuccessful.
Therefore, desperate situations called for desperate
measures and a clearly rattled president's response was to accuse the
prime minister of soliciting a bribe of Rs. 25,000 some 15 years back.
It is in the backdrop of this statement reaching the
public domain that the pre-cabinet meeting got underway at Temple Trees
on Wednesday, October 2, with the prime minister himself in a
belligerent mood, clearly irked and vexed at the president's allegation.
It was also not lost on the prime minister that just the
previous week, in Pilimatalawe, Kumaratunga had lambasted the entire
Wickremesinghe/Wijewardene family, casting serious aspersions on their
integrity.
Thus, after the agenda for the cabinet meeting to follow
was gone through with, Commerce Minister Ravi Karunanayake decided to
bell the cat.
Target
Said Karunanayake: "See what the president has said
now. She has made allegations against many of us but this allegation
against the prime minister is totally unacceptable. You have always
spoken out against character assassination and now she is directly
targeting you under cover of her immunity."
The minister went on to say it has been proven time and
again the president's behaviour does not match her thinking and
proceeded to produce a newspaper dated January 19, wherein the president
is quoted as saying she cannot work with the UNP.
"Despite such statements and provocative actions of
the president, you wanted to cohabit. Today it is proven she has a plan
of her own. You have to respond to this diabolical allegation,"
Karunanayake told the prime minister.
And respond the prime minister did, having already
dispatched letters of demand calling for a retraction and an apology
from all media organisations that gave publicity to Kumaratunga's
statement.
The prime minister told his ministers, the president's
statement was a tissue of lies aimed at provoking him to call off
cohabitation and sabotage the peace process due to sheer
envy over its success.
"When she applied to admit her son to Royal College,
she was not living at the address stated in the application. She had
furnished false information in her application. When the authorities
checked and found the falsity of the application, the appeal board too
rejected the application. She then approached President J.R. Jayewardene
and he was trying to help at that stage. We were trying to help her at
the time because she was helping the UNP by breaking up the SLFP. That
is why our government had also given her a liquor licence," the
prime minister said.
Continuing, Wickremesinghe said he asked Kumaratunga at
that stage to apply to D.S. Senanayake College but that she did not do
so.
"Then President Jayewardene agreed to give a
presidential order to put Vimukthi Kumaratunga to Royal College. At that
time, Vijaya was killed and Chandrika left the country with her
children. There was nothing I could do to help because of the false
information in her application," the prime minister said.
Liar
Added the prime minister: "Since the president has
immunity, there is nothing I can do about the Rs. 25,000 allegation but
I have asked the media to retract the false allegation. Effectively, in
so doing, the media would be calling her a liar."
The prime minister also said in such circumstances, it
was extremely difficult to work on cohabitation and asked the ministers
what they thought he should do next.
Responded Karunanayake: "Cohabitation has failed
miserably. We can cohabit with the PA but not the president. She has
been working from day one to destabilise the government. Some of her
officials are still there helping her to do so. Therefore, we must end
this farce of cohabitation now."
Supporting Karunanayake was Justice Minister W.J.M.
Lokubandara who asked the prime minister how he could trust Kumaratunga
considering the diabolical lies she utters. Said he: "Enough is
enough, we must impeach her. She is on a difficult wicket and her
speeches in Anuradhapura and Pilimatalawe clearly prove she is not fit
to hold the office of president. She has seriously character
assassinated the prime minister. We must submit the impeachment
resolution before the 19th Amendment is taken up for debate. That will
also strengthen the hands of those PA MPs who are to vote for the
amendment."
Western Province Regional Development Minister, M.H.
Mohomed was of a different view stating the government should first get
the 19th Amendment passed and with the two third majority under the
belt, proceed to impeach the president.
However, Lands Minister Rajitha Senaratne disagreed,
stating the government should proceed to impeach the president right
away, adding there has already been undue delay.
Act without delay
"Due to the myth of cohabitation, we have delayed
taking action against her. There were so many issues of corruption that
could have been pursued. We must act without delay. Bringing the
impeachment now will also give added courage to her MPs who are waiting
to support us," he added.
Senaratne further said the Bandaranaikes have been and
are a disaster for the country and that once Kumaratunga is out of the
way, the government could cohabit with the PA.
At this stage, Minister Lokubandara once again reiterated
his position of impeaching the president immediately but the prime
minister said the government should first get the 19th Amendment passed
without losing sight of the immediate objective.
But the matter did not rest there either, with
Karunanayake stating that they should confront the president with her
allegation at the cabinet meeting scheduled for 6 p.m. the very day.
Replied the prime minister: "I have already handed
over the matter to my lawyers. I will ask her directly about the
allegation. Let us not take it up at cabinet this week. Her plan is to
raise the vehicle issue this week and detract from this issue. Let's not
play into her hands. I will handle it."
Added he: "Let's get over the 19th Amendment first
and then look at the situation thereafter."
No sooner the prime minister made his pronouncement,
Minister Karunanayake once again ventured an opinion on the need for a
united approach by the cabinet.
Karunanayake said they must speak with one voice and that
different ministers should not give different interpretations to the
government's approach.
"We want you to be the prime minister and see us
through the peace process and development of the economy for many years
to come. Therefore, two - three people can't do the fighting to protect
the government and another minister to be Arahat and project himself at
our expense as a peace maker, making us look like the
trouble-makers," the minister also said.
Possibly realising the stage was thus set for a battle
between Karunanayake and Minister Moragoda, the prime minister
interjected. Said the prime minister: "This type of conflict among
ministers must stop."
Blame
But Karunanayake pressed on. "There were certain
matters taken up at these meetings regarding inquiries such as P.B.
Jayasundera. Nothing has been taken up and we are blamed for breaking up
the cohabitation," Karunanayake further said.
Shot back the prime minister: "Some such statements
are attributed to you also."
Replied Karunanayake: "Whatever I have said, I stand
by."
Entering the discussion at this point was Minister
Milinda Moragoda who said he was prepared to let the matter rest as
requested by the prime minister but that he does not character
assassinate people as others attempted to do to him. "I have been
appoinetd to the cabinet by the prime minister and as long as he has
faith and trust in me, I will continue," he said.
Not agreeing Karunanayake said Moragoda's accusation
against him and some other ministers were told to the media wherein he
said Moragoda had questioned how the government can proceed when two or
three ministers are always fighting and putting cohabitation with the
president in jeopardy.
Shot back Moragoda: "You were insinuating against
me."
Retorted Karunanayake: "I stand by what I said. I
too value my character. This is Moragoda versus the UNP. We have also
played a part in forming this government. Don't try to show that we are
always fighting and others are the peace makers."
Intervening, Prime Minister Wickremesinghe smoothened the
ruffled feathers of the ministers and said there had been some
misunderstanding and the two ministers should meet with him outside and
sort things out.
And making light of the whole situation was Cooperatives
Minister A.R.M. Cader, who offered to host both Karunanayake and
Moragoda for a buriyani feed to settle the dispute.
On that light note, both ministers agreed to bury the
hatchet and work together with a common purpose to secure the two third
majority for the successful passage of the 19th Amendment. "Let's
put all this behind us and work together," both ministers said
almost in unison and shook hands.
But just prior to the conclusion of the meeting, Minister
Karunanayake told the prime minister, they should ask the president if
not at this meeting, at least at the next meeting, who the real rogues
were.
"Let us ask her about land given to Ronnie Peiris to
push the golf course deal, Channel 9, Thawakkal, Air Lanka, vehicles
issue, the handbag case, Rubber Manufacturing Corporation issue, Evans
deal and her own allegation that Anuruddha Ratwatte was the biggest
rogue in her PA government," Karunanayake said.
The prime minister nodded his agreement, but said they
should hold their horses till he asks the president directly regarding
her allegation.
Meanwhile the battle for supremacy in the opposition was
also hotting up last week with President Kumaratunga and the Matara
District MP, all set to undercut Opposition Leader Mahinda Rajapakse.
In this respect, Opposition Leader Mahinda Rajapakse
through his Secretary, G.L.W. Samarasinghe on Tuesday, October 1, wrote
to all MPs summoning them for a meeting on Monday, October 7, 4 p.m. at
Committee Room 2 in parliament.
Though Samaraweera as chief opposition whip was expected
to sign this letter convening the meeting, he did not do so.
Power struggle
However, the very next day, Samaraweera sent a telegram
to all MPs, convening a meeting of the parliamentary group at 5.30 p.m.
on October 7 at President's House, stating the president will be
presiding at the meeting.
Not stopping at that, Samaraweera goes on to state the
letter informing the MPs of a meeting in parliament for the same day can
be considered cancelled.
Thus, apart from meeting the challenge to the president's
powers through the 19th Amendment, the PA is also faced with an internal
power struggle and given this situation, even if the 19th Amendment does
not succeed and the president is forced to go for an election with the
threats of impeachment also hanging over her, it is a matter of time
before Kumaratunga will have to call it curtains.
|
H.L. and CC's
neutrality
Serious questions on the neutrality of the
Constitutional Council (CC) have arisen following President's
Counsel, H.L. de Silva's appearance for the People's Alliance in
the Supreme Court to argue against the 19th Amendment to the
constitution.
De Silva was appointed to the Constitutional Council as
President Kumaratunga's nominee and the understanding at the time
of the formation of the council was that no practising lawyer
would be appointed to the council and if appointed would cease to
so practise.
President's Counsel de Silva of course had earlier taken
up the position that no such conditions were imposed on him at the
time he took office and as such was free to practise.
But the fact is several eminent persons declined to
accept nomination to the Constitutional Council for the very
reason that they were precluded from practising and were expressly
so told.
For example, on behalf of the plantation Tamils, CWC
Leader, Armugam Thondaman nominated Attorney R. Raddhakrishnan but
his nomination had to be withdrawn for the very reason cited
above.
Likewise, President's Counsels L.C. Seneviratne and
Ranjit Abeysuriya were considered for nomination but had to
decline due to the bar on practising law.
Likewise, even the JVP's nominee, Attorney S.S. Wijeratne,
on accepting the appointment, agreed not to practise law.
The question then arises, why a different standard for
President's Counsel H.L. de Silva? Is everyone not really equal
before the law?
This situation is all the more ironic since
de Silva was one of the members of the Constitutional
Council who proposed that members should have immunity for their
actions, thereby giving them cover from the fundamental rights
chapter in the constitution for appointments made by them, and the
very day de Silva was arguing against the 19th Amendment to the
constitution on behalf of the PA, the 18th Amendment to the
constitution whereby the immunity so sought for the members of the
Constitutional Council was also listed for argument.
Well, Mr. Prime Minister, is this how the Constitutional
Council and the independent commissions you solemnly pledged to
the nation are going to function?
Surely if there is no equality for the members of
the Constitutional Council, can you expect fairplay for the people
at large? |
|