|
Murali,
John Howard and Sri Lanka Cricket

| Arjuna
Ranatunga |
Australian
PM John Howard |
Muttiah
Muralitharan |
By
Arjuna Ranatunga
The
Oracle has spoken at last, not from Delphi but from Sydney. It
comes in the form of a verdict of Prime Minister John Howard of
Australia that Murali does throw. His verdict had to come sooner
or later. Why it did not come sooner is a mystery, probably may
be for lack of a proper opportunity. Politicians, the world
over, are an obdurate species who feel that they should have the
final say on any issue and are obtuse enough to think that their
world is sacrosanct. John Howard is no exception. Otherwise it
is very difficult to explain why he should express contrary to a
decision given by the panel of experts of the ICC that Murali's
action is legitimate.
Even
the scientifically analysed disclosure that Murali, due to a
defect at birth, cannot straighten his elbow is ignored by him.
Australian cricketers of the calibre of Allan Border the Chapel
brothers; Steven Waugh and Shane Warne, his only rival, have
seen no problems in Murali's action and praised his bowling
efforts. Apparently, to conclude from John Howard's statement
these cricketers do not know what they speak about. One is left
to wonder why the ICC did not in the first instance solicit John
Howard's opinion. After all Australia leads the rest of the
world in both versions of the game of cricket and John Howard
leads Australia. What better opinion can the ICC get.
The
only point to wonder is why Murali is singled out for this
treatment. One in ten of the bowlers around the world have
doubtful deliveries and this includes the Australians. Why their
bowling action is not subject to the same scrutiny is a mystery.
May be because Murali represents a small developing country in
the third world which can easily be bettered and bruised.
The
supine attitude of the 'Sri Lankan Cricket' administration also
defies explanation. These supermen apparently 'see nothing'
'hear nothing' and 'speak nothing'. Perhaps it is safer and more
lucrative to adopt this posture which will not deprive them of
the expensive junkets abroad at the expense of Sri Lankan
cricket. They very well know that it is only by bending before
their 'White Masters' that they can pick up the crumbs. One
cannot otherwise explain why they cannot pick up the issue of
all other bowlers whose deliveries are suspect. Murali has been
singled out for censure even when cleared by the ICC experts
committee. All other bowlers with suspect actions a carry on
regardless. No one has the backbone to question their bowling
actions. Not even 'Sri Lanka Cricket'. The Sri Lankan Cricket
officials act as if only to prove and confirm that they are
fossils who se only concern is self interest.
Finally,
a concluding comment about the mighty Howard. It is said that
'fools rush in where angels fear to tread'. It is time that John
Howard takes heed of this well known adage and not speak with
his foot in his mouth. It can only bring his respected position
as Prime Minister of his country into disrepute. This much he
owes to his great country. As for Murali, he should ignore these
senile remarks and concentrate on his cricket. He should tour
Australia with his head held high, conscious of the fact that he
is the greatest bowler of the century; and honour bestowed on
him by the renowned 'Wisden', the best available authority on
cricket.
It's
a case of too many cooks and spoilt soup
By.
T.M.K. Samat
AN
outpouring of anger and sympathy over Muttiah Muralitharan's
now-forbidden doosra is to be expected here. Not a day passes
without someone rising to the defence of the country's famous
son. Of course, much of the sentiments are dictated by a sense
of patriotism - and so, emotions will outweigh pragmatism.
There's
a lot in the issue, though, that sets the blood a racing. Given
that English match referee Chris Broad triggered the
controversy, the old devil of the black/white divide at once
comes into play. That Muralitharan's chief rival in the race for
a place in cricket history is Australian Shane Warne doesn't
quite help stem the racial innuendos being made, albeit less
offensively in public than in private. Anyone denying that the
issue is without racial overtones would have spent too long away
with the friaries. The ideal world of equality we wish for is
still in the making.
One
has to only look at the emasculation of Zimbabwe cricket by the
black/white devil to remind us that things in the cricket world,
too, are anything but perfect, though it has to be said that the
rigid adherence to the old colonial traditions set by the game's
founding country is a lot less now. After more than a century of
white domination, there's greater equality in the ICC. The
long-enjoyed veto powers of England and Australia, for instance,
is a thing of the past; two Asians, Dalmiya and incumbent Ehsan
Mani and West Indian, Clyde Walcott, over the last two decades
were appointed president of the ICC - the high office which at
one time, by law, could be held only by an Englishman or
Australian. As well, Asian membership to the Test-playing club
has doubled since the 1980s.
All
these changes in a quarter century ought to have pacified ICC's
critics. But it hasn't. Probably 25 years is too short a time to
rid the suspicion and doubt bred from centuries-long
colonial-style governance of cricket? The struggles for
independence and the collapse of many iron curtains might have
made the world a different place. But old attitudes linger - and
not unusually, the cricket world yet resonates of that old thing
about capitalists' looking for ''reds under beds": the old
black/white devil can never be trusted.
That
being in the subconscious, the prohibition of Muralitharan's
doosra was always going to be interpreted, rightly or wrongly,
in racial terms. As if the job of taking the issue away from
that miasma isn't difficult enough, the ICC's task is further
complicated by the foolish opinions of heads of states. The
Australian Prime Minister, John Howard, with rather crude
bluntness called the world's most prolific bowler a
''chucker". He is, of course, entitled to his opinion on
Muralitharan as an individual, but as prime minister. well,
that's nearly as risky as swearing allegiance to Pauline Hanson
and her infamous philosophy.
Not
surprisingly there were rejoinders to Howard's remarks.
Muralitharan himself as good as asked him to mind his own
business and confine himself to managing the affairs of his
country than talk on things he knows nothing about. Our own
prime minister, Mahinda Rajapakse thought he was duty-bound to
say his piece: He threatened to drag the ICC to the courthouse.
His expressions of loyalty to Muralitharan and Sri Lanka cricket
are extremely heartwarming, except that his reaction is more
than a touch exaggerated; a bit like wielding a sledgehammer to
swat a fly. Since Howard started it all, he probably thinks the
doosra ought to be taken at the level of prime ministers.
Wednesday he spoke of soliciting support of the governments
of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh _ as if the issue is
one that threatens the country's sovereignty. A reminder, sir:
this all about the doosra which medical experts say doesn't
conform to the ICC's playing rules.
If
our prime minister felt obliged to respond to his Australian
counterpart, then, he might have taken a leaf off the book of
Lakshman Kadirgamar: "Shopping is for sissies". The
foreign minister was responding to the Australians' refusal to
play in Sri Lanka in the 1996 World Cup over fears of security,
and Warne's fright about being killed by a bomb while shopping.
But then Kadirgamar is a man of eloquence - and so must his
repartees be.
The
Minister of Sport, Jeevan Kumaratunga, not surprisingly, too,
jumped on the doosra bandwagon. He wants to resolve the matter
directly with the ICC. Just how he hopes to that is unclear.
Does he think a friendly pat on Pakistani ICC chief Mani's
shoulder and a reminder that ''we Asians must stand
together" will win the doosra legitimacy? Someone in the
SLC ought to advise the minister that the ICC is not some remote
kachcheri where trembling officials will acquiesce to his every
request. It's best if minister Kumaratunga leave dealings with
the ICC to SLC officials - unless, of course, he can answer to
the name of Arjuna Ranatunga, who the cricket world knows very
well and will give ear to. But if he thinks his ministerial
presence in the august body would sway opinion in Muralitharan's
favour, good luck.
Clearly,
there are too many who want to clamber aboard the world
champion's bandwagon. Whether they want to help themselves to
some popularity on the back of Muralitharan's banished doosra or
to genuinely support him in his hour of crisis will not be
known. But there's a danger that it all could end up like the
broth that by too many cooks spoilt. This is all getting a bit
too much and it wouldn't be such a bad thing if we dunk our
collective heads into a bucket of ice, then sit back and take a
long hard look at the facts of the case.
What
is an unalterable fact is that the doosra is illegal - a
conclusion reached not by ICC officials, but arrived at after
comprehensive tests on the off spinners' action by medical
specialists in the field of human movement. So, casting
aspersions on match referee Broad is pointless - his doubts
about the doosra has been confirmed, period. Which makes SLC's
written complaint to the ICC on Broad's alleged partiality very
stupid, a faux pas that surely will show our cricket
administration in poor light.
Rather
than make allegations of bias, the SLC might have done better to
dwell on the positive aspects of the medical specialists'
report. While it confirms that Muralitharan's arm at the point
of the doosra-delivery is in breach of the law that allows a
five-degree elbow slant, the report also adds that the allowance
to spinners is unfair. It questions why a paceman should be
permitted a ten-degree bend and a spinner, half that. The report
concludes by recommending a thorough review of the present set
of rules. The ICC responded by appointing a review committee to
study and suggest recommendations.
Obviously,
all that is being said with the review committee in sitting is
meant to influence public opinion while the committee drafts
their recommendations, on which the ICC's final judgement
whether to ban or not Muralitharan's doosra. His critics, of
course, will remain critical, and there's nothing you can do to
shut them up. Happily though, the opposition to the doosra is
not universal. The backing the Sri Lankan off spinner has had
from the present coach and last captain of the supposed enemy,
Australia, is of incalculable value. If anything, we ought to
craft an effective public relations campaign that would add to
the list of the doosra supporters. Mouthing stupid, ignorant and
blindly nationalistic statements isn't the way to get about it.
So, if you don't have anything sensible to say, it's better not
say anything at all. Leave that job to the experts.
Captains
come in all shapes and sizes
Marvan
Atapattu has made a quiet start to his period as Sri Lanka's
official cricket captain. Not until a man takes entire
responsibility for the direction of his team can any assessment
be made of his performance and prospects. Till then it is all
shadow boxing. Not that the new man has exactly been placed in
the crucible of competition. Alas Zimbabwe is sending children
into battle in the name of corrupt and cynical elders. A team
raised from the Galle Face on a Sunday afternoon could beat them
with runs to spare.
Atapattu's
uncertain beginning is unsurprising because he is not a natural
leader of men. Suddenly it is his voice that is heard before
play, at the fall of wickets and in the rooms. Suddenly his
every utterance carries significance . he cannot relax even at
nightfall and must watch his tongue because even off- the -cuff
remarks can echo around the country. Accordingly newcomers are
often inclined to feel their way. Apparently two events change a
man's life much more than a child and becoming captain of a
cricket team. Although the female of the species may not agree,
male friends say it is a close run thing between them.
Of
course captains come in all shapes and sizes, both literally and
temperamentally. Warwick Armstrong - The Big Ship- was an
enormous Australian of forceful personality who once started
reading a newspaper on the field by way of protest against the
slow play of the opposing side. Frank Worrell was a calm fellow
who in the heat of battle had the presence of mind. advised his
excited fast bowler to avoid no-balls. Yet it was the West
Indian who endured a spell when alcohol had the better of him.
Marvan
is neither the most dynamic character in his team or its most
obvious leader. Kumar Sangakarra has been blessed with an
especially distinctive outlook whilst Chaminda Vaas, the
experience and commands respect. Somehow, though, Sri Lanka
found itself obliged to choose between Hashan Tillerkaratne, a
fading older player with dubious attachments, Mahela Jayawardena,
a talented batsmen of some accomplishment whose immaturity was
exposed by the Australians, and Atapattu.
Rightly
the staunch opener was nominated and now the focus must be on
helping him find his feet. Sri Lanka cannot be changing captains
every five minutes. Part of the secret of Australian cricket is
that the position of the national captain is regarded with
respect. Only four men have served as official Australian
captain in the last twenty years, and the latest appointment
might last another decade. Australia also has a properly elected
and accountable administration presiding over the game, a boon
not universally shared.
Not
that Sri Lanka has chopped and changed its leaders. Both Duleep
Mendis and Arjuna Ranatunga had long stints in charge. Now they
are serving the game in other capacities which is excellent news
provided both men conduct themselves with due disinterest. No
the least impressive part of Nelson Mandela's leadership was
that he did not waste any time settling scores. Nor did he
emerge from captivity with any chips on his shoulders. Instead
he concentrated upon taking his country in the right direction.
Here is the challenge that confronts the rest of us, locked in
our little battles and nursing our minor grievances.
Doubtless
it helps Atapattu that he has been given a clean slate by those
looking into the strange circumstance of money being found in a
hotel room he had occupied. At such times one yearns to invite
Inspector Poirot to launch one of the probes. Atapattu is no
spendthrift and the notion of him leaving money around lacked
credibility. A man could spend a lifetime trying to comprehend
the ins and outs of Sri Lankan politics. Not the least
interesting part of the situation is the extent to which
politics and cricket interact in this country. But , then,
pride is at stake in both areas. And money is available.
Most
captains find their first year the toughest. Time is needed to
adjust to the shock or responsibility. Moreover, a man must also
perform on the field or his place falls into peril. Marvan's
greatest challenge may be the need to think about his players
and not just his own game. But many introverted characters
relish leadership precisely because it forces them to emerge
from their shells. By the same token many inhibited people come
to life upon the stage.
Not
until a few years have passed can any judgement be made about
the newcomer's leadership skills. Results cannot be the only
criteria applied because they depend in part upon the resources
available. Ultimately,though, a cricket team reflects its
captain so the progress of the side will be watched closely,
especially with regard to the spirit of the players and the
boldness of the enterprise.
Lions
rugby rumble 2004
Going
is tough and it certainly is the right time to rally round the
Red, Golden, Blue combination to show solidarity towards your
alma mater in a pre season get together at the CR & FC
hockey grounds.
The
date is Saturday 29
May. The ball will be set in motion from 7.30pm onwards. Trinity
rugby is undergoing a process of recovery with able guidance
from the 'Rugby Scrummage', the entity in charge of
administering the game at college. The first move for the
current season is happening on 29 May.
As
quoted from the immediate past president of the Colombo branch
OBA Gotabhaya Dasanayake ' Rugby is Trinity's illicit lover'.
This itself is an indication of the depth of concern which
revolves around college rugby. A set of die hard dynamic Old
Boys spearheaded by Jayantha Jayawardena and Chris Halangoda
have provided this opportunity for Trinitians and their families
to be a part of this unique get together.
Entertainment
for kids will be a part of the agenda, whilst a variety of
stalls of food and beverages (at ones preference) are in store.
A lot has been talked about as per possible improvements of
college rugby by various groups. Time has now come to make your
contribution. Be a part of Rugby Rumble 2004 to get first hand
information of the pending manoeuvres aimed at resurrecting
Trinity rugby.
Entrance
ticket is priced at a nominal rate of Rs. 200/- and accompanies
a 2004 fixture card as a bonus.
Trinity
play the first leg of the Bradby Shield on 07 August (Saturday)
at the Royal Rugby grounds while the second leg will be on 21
August (Saturday) at Bogambara. The 50th Trinity - Thomian
encounter will be on 3 July at the Pallekele rugby stadium.
For
further details contact:
Chris
Halangoda (0777 - 784790), Anura Ratnawardena (0714 -734134),
Hamza Hassanally (0777 - 755230)
Calling
all Trinitians young and old. Be there at the CR & FC Hockey
grounds on the 29th of this month to show the true spirit. 'Respice
Finem'.
Waidyatilaka
creates history
History
was created when the first ever "Advance Technical
Officials Course" for masters officials was
ceremonially opened by Kiyoshi Konoike President of Asia
Masters Athletics in Bangkok, Thailand on 16 May.
The
course director and lecturer was none other than our own
P.H.D.Waidyatilaka,Chairman, Technical Committee of Asian
Masters Athletics.
.Waidyatilaka
is a highly respected internationally acclaimed IAAF
international technical official and lecturer. He is a
member of the Stadia Committee of the World Body ( WMA ) and a
founder vice president of the Asian Veteran Athletes Association
and current President of Sri Lanka Masters Athletics
Torsten
Carlius President of "World Masters Athletics" in a
message for the opening ceremony stated:
Now
Asia takes the initiative to organise the first Advanced
Technical Course for masters officials here in Bangkok and as
WMA President I welcome this initiative with very great
pleasure. Asia is an important region within the masters
movement and as far as I know this initiative is the first ever
in our history and it should be followed by many more in all our
six regions.
According
to reports reaching Colombo,the 3 day course was a tremendous
success. The participants from all over Asia and officials of
AMA were full of praise for Waidyatilaka for conducting the
course in an exemplary manner.
Janashakthi
sponsors Murali magic website
Janashakthi
Insurance, the fastest growing insurance company in Sri Lanka,
has once again come forward to offer their felicitations to
their most celebrated staff member, Muttiah Muralitharan.
Janashakthi Insurance has on many occasions congratulated Murali
when he achieved a significant milestone in his illustrious
cricket career and has done so yet again. Janashakthi Insurance
has sponsored Murali's official website www.muralimagic.com
which will be launched to commemorate Murali becoming the world
record holder for the highest number of test wickets in
international cricket.
|