|
Kissing
goodbye to US$ 4.5 billion
|

Chandrika
Kumaratunga, Lakshman Kadirgamar, Nirupan Sen, Erik Solheim and
Anton Balasingham
|
By
Suranimala
While
President Chandrika Kumaratunga continued her search for a simple
majority in parliament to push through the constituent assembly with a
view to abolishing the executive presidency, Sri Lanka faced the
prospect of losing US$ 4.5 billion in aid due to the peace process being
stalled.
There
is no gainsaying that former Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe
effectively put together a grand international coalition to push the
peace process forward whilst also providing a safety net for Sri Lanka
culminating in the June 2003 Tokyo donor conference which saw pledges to
the tune of US$ 4.5 billion being pledged for the reconstruction and
development of Sri Lanka as a whole.
Political
consequences
Though
the monies pledged were directly linked to progress in the peace
process, it was not just the north east that was to benefit from the
pledges but also the south, which of course would have had far reaching
political consequences for the President in particular and the
opposition in general.
It
was also a time the LTTE had temporarily withdrawn from the negotiating
table and commenced pushing for an interim administration, which itself
saw both the then government and the LTTE forwarding proposals which
were to be the basis for the resumption of negotiations.
Finally
after much hemming and hawing, the LTTE submitted its proposals for an
interim administration in response to the government's on October 30 and
the stage was being set for the resumption of talks and with it the
inflow of the US$ 4.5 billion pledges made when the President egged on
by an irritable Indian High Commissioner, Nirupan Sen decided to strike.
Yes,
it is in this backdrop, President Kumaratunga upset the apple cart with
the takeover of three ministries on November 4 and the rest is history.
The Norwegians withdrew from the process until such time there was
clarity in the south and the SLFP together with the JVP launched a
massive public agitational campaign against the LTTE's interim
administration proposal calling for it to be consigned to the dustbin
and in the process urging for greater Indian involvement in the peace
process.
Then
came the general election of April 2 and the task of reviving the peace
process fell once again on the President, who saddled with a hung
parliament not only had to re-invite the much harangued Norwegians as
facilitators but also agree to recognise the LTTE as the sole
representative of the Tamils.
But
of course, given the role played by Nirupan Sen and his chief lieutenant
in the High Commission, Taranjith Singh in putting together the anti-UNF
coalition, a more direct role for India in the process was also called
for by the likes of Foreign Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar and the JVP.
At
the same time, the President agreed to honour the much criticised
ceasefire agreement to the letter and resume negotiations on the
strength of the LTTE's interim administration proposals to boot in a
complete reversal of the position taken by the Freedom Alliance in its
manifesto.
For
Kumaratunga, it was of paramount importance to get the show on the road
somehow because that was the only way to keep the government afloat in
parliament in addition to attracting the much needed US$ 4.5 billion
pledged in aid and had no qualms in getting about this task
notwithstanding the immense contradictions in the overall approach due
to a lack of clear strategy.
Kumaratunga
of course despised the idea of having to call back the Norwegians given
her dealings with Sen but was left with no option after failing to
obtain the anticipated result at the election with the LTTE through the
TNA holding the whip hand. And as far as the LTTE was concerned, the
only way they were going to return to the table was if the Norwegians
were involved.
Contradictions
And
true to form, before long the internal contradictions within government
began surfacing with the JVP making it clear the party will not in any
way support the commencement of negotiations on the basis of the interim
administration proposals or for that matter recognise the LTTE as the
role representative of the Tamils.
The
JVP, notwithstanding the dilemma faced by the President, was anxious to
please Sen who after all helped facilitate Party Leader, Somawansa
Amarasinghe doing the disappearing act during the JVP terror era and
wanted to keep its end of the bargain come what may. Accordingly, the
Marxists continued to agitate the involvement of the Norwegians and the
increasing influence of the West in the Sri Lankan peace process in
answer to Sen's call.
The
JVP went even further and insisted the role of Norway be confined to
facilitation with no role to play at the negotiating table, all
conditions which were anathema to the LTTE.
By
this time, given the initial responses of the President and the publicly
displayed confusion in government ranks, LTTE's Chief Negotiator, Anton
Balasingham went on record stating the Norwegians would fix the dates
for the talks "in a day or two," giving the impression
Kumaratunga had conceded to all points raised by the Tigers.
But
with days ticking by and no announcement forthcoming, it became evident,
Kumaratunga was retracing her steps and despite the positive spin
attempted to be given by the Norwegians, the process was hopelessly
stalled.
Not
only was Kumaratunga by this time unable to agree for negotiations on
the ISGA without having the core issues on the agenda but also to put
together a sound macro economic policy for donor assistance because of
the welfarist approach of the JVP, which was insisting on going by the
pledges made in the UPFA manifesto.
Optimistic
However,
in a bid to break the deadlock over the peace process agenda, Norway's
Special Envoy, Erik Solheim flew back into Sri Lanka the previous week
sounding optimistic the two parties could be brought to the table at
least for exploratory talks sometime late July or early August.
And
just as much as the JVP was doing its darndest to edge the Norwegians
out, the Vikings were equally adamant to stick in there and fly the
Western flag, not oblivious to Sen's manipulations though a picture of
camaraderie was maintained for good diplomatic relations with regular
briefings also given.
But
try as he might to get the show on the road, Solheim had little success
with the LTTE insisting on the institutionalisation of the ISGA before
commencing talks on the core issues and the President egged on by the
JVP and Kadirgamar equally adamant there must be parallel discussions on
the core issues.
By
now the President was also faced with the reality of the provincial
council polls and with the JVP coming out publicly against the ISGA
proposals, she was just not in a position to face the hustings on a
divided platform.
The
election was doubly important for the President since she wanted to use
the mandate received as an endorsement for her proposal to change the
constitution through the mechanism of a constituent assembly and could
not leave anything to chance on that score.
And
the gulf between the government and the LTTE to get the peace talks
revived, further to the dilemma faced by Kumaratunga, was best explained
by Solheim when he met the 13 nation donor community inclusive of the
four co-chairs and the six funding agencies at Ambassador Hans
Brattskar's residence on Friday, May 28.
By
this time, Solheim's mission to Sri Lanka had not borne fruit with both
sides not relenting on their positions and his frustration was evident
when he commenced his briefing with a subtle threat to the diplomats
present.
Details
of the last briefing given to the diplomats in Colombo by Solheim was
reported in this column and the Norwegians obviously not wanting the
people of Sri Lanka to be privy to how an issue of vital importance to
the country was progressing struck a warning note at the outset.
Solheim
said details of his last briefing to them was reported in the media
extensively and if it was to be repeated on this occasion there would be
no more briefings.
Having
given that warning, Solheim explained to the diplomats present the
respective positions taken by President Kumaratunga and the LTTE on the
all important interim administration proposals.
He
said the LTTE wants the negotiations to commence on the ISGA and after
its institutionalisation, move on to discuss the core issues.
Continuing,
Solheim said, President Kumaratunga on the other hand while agreeing to
commence negotiations on the ISGA is insisting the core issues be
discussed parallel to it.
Problem
Solheim
went on to say a further problem was the lack of chemistry and goodwill
between the LTTE and the new government. He said there was a good
rapport between the LTTE and G.L. Peiris and Milinda Moragoda which was
not there with the present set up.
Not
stopping at that, Solheim explained that the LTTE had strong doubts
about the government's commitment to the process due to the diverse
opinions expressed by different sections of it, viz a viz the JVP and
Lakshman Kadirgamar.
The
irony, however, Solheim said, is that both parties want to resume talks
as soon as possible and expressed the hope some progress could be made
if the two parties could be brought to the table even for exploratory
talks.
Explaining
further, Solheim said with regards to the venue of the meetings, the
government's tendency was to choose one location whereas the LTTE wanted
to move around.
He
said the government wants to avoid criticism by moving from venue to
venue whereas the LTTE wanted to move around for purposes of fund
raising. There was however consensus the first meeting would be in Oslo,
Norway.
Solheim
further said the LTTE will organise a workshop in Europe with the
participation of Balasingham end June to work out its strategy whilst
the government of Sri Lanka must formulate its negotiating team and the
principles of negotiation.
Interestingly,
Solheim also threw light on Kumaratunga's mindset, stating in view of
the upcoming provincial council elections, the government would find it
difficult to put out a detailed economic policy and in that situation,
the policy statement to be released mid June might be a little vague.
It
is in the backdrop of this overall assessment and briefing on the ground
realities that the co-chairs, USA, Norway, European Union (EU) and Japan
met in Brussels on Tuesday, June 1, to assess and consider the
disbursement of the US $ 4.5 billion secured by the Wickremesinghe
government to the newly elected UPFA administration. The co-chairs were
represented by US Deputy Secretary of State, Richard Armitage, Deputy
Foreign Minister, Vidar Helgessen, Commissioner, Chris Patten and
Special Envoy, Yasushi Akashi.
By
the time the co-chairs met, a draft statement prepared by the EU was
already in circulation and a team of specialists worked on it and
provided a final draft for the consideration of the high powered
delegation which stamped approval without amendments of any
significance.
Clear
signal
The
significance in the statement however was in the very first paragraph
which for effect was in bold print sending out a clear signal to both
the government and the LTTE, that unless they got their act together,
the money would be gone forever.
"In
a world of competing crises, Sri Lanka's donor co-chairs came together
today and urged in the strongest possible terms a rapid resumption of
the peace negotiations so that Sri Lanka can benefit from the generosity
of the international community. They noted that, with so many other
demands on donors, donor attention and funding might go elsewhere unless
the peace process makes progress."
It
is also pertinent to note here the reference to the "peace process
makes progress," as opposed to a mere resumption of talks for the
monies to start trickling in.
Equally
significant is the fact, the co-chairs chose not to fix another date for
their next meeting, clearly indicative they will now wait for the
government and the LTTE to get their act together before taking any
further steps in coming to Sri Lanka's aid.
And
on Wednesday, June 2, Patten telephoned Foreign Minister Kadirgamar and
briefed him on the outcome of the meeting, details of which would not
have been music to his ears.
In
the overall context, the pressure will now be on President Kumaratunga
to recommence the process, with the LTTE well expected to sit back and
wait for her to come to the table on the terms set by them.
The
LTTE knows only too well Kumaratunga is fighting a battle for survival
and not only needs the funding desperately but also to get the process
started soon after the provincial polls to get breathing space in
parliament for her constitutional manoeuvre.
Standing
firm
And
despite Solheim putting pressure on Balasingham in London to compromise
with regard to the agenda, the LTTE is standing firm on the basis of the
mandate it received from the Tamil people, obviously not too keen to be
tied down to the Tokyo Declaration either.
The
LTTE after all was not party to the Tokyo confab and is already on
record distancing itself from the caveats therein including 18 (d) which
calls for "parallel progress towards a final political settlement
based on the principles of the Oslo Declaration."
Even
the government though on track with regard to parallel progress towards
a final political settlement is hard put to do so on the basis of the
Oslo Declaration, which calls for a federal solution recognising the
rights of the Tamil people for internal self determination, the JVP
simply would not hear of it.
That
the LTTE is prepared to play hard ball on this issue was also evident
when World Bank's Country Director, Peter Harold went to Wanni on
Tuesday to discuss funding for urgent humanitarian needs in the north
east.
Harold
possibly hoped he could convince the LTTE to agree to a funding
mechanism on the lines of the North East Rehabilitation Fund (NERF) but
Political Wing Leader, S.P. Tamilselvan stuck to his guns insisting on
the institutionalising of the ISGA in keeping with the mandate received
by the Tamil people at the general election.
Said
Tamilselvan - "In the absence of an effective interim
administration as democratically mandated by the Tamil people, any other
mechanism cannot cope effectively to address the urgent humanitarian
needs of nation of people affected by two decades of war."
For,
the LTTE knew only too well, if they agreed to a financial mechanism and
the funds started trickling in, Kumaratunga would not be too concerned
over a delay in getting the talks started.
Thus,
the LTTE position is clear and the snap election called by Kumaratunga
has only strengthened its case because it is the mandate received at
that election the LTTE is now citing as justification for sticking to
the ISGA demand as the basis for negotiations.
Weakened
government
These
factors were not lost on Kumaratunga when she called a snap poll in
April 2004 to satisfy her personal political agenda at the expense of
the nation and this column specifically pointed out at the time the
result would be a hung parliament irrespective of the winner forcing a
weakened government to negotiate with a much stronger LTTE.
That
has now come to pass and apart from the government having to negotiate
from a position of weakness it has also put the US$ 4.5 billion aid
package in jeopardy.
And
given the government's inability due to policy differences to come up
with a macro economic policy, even the funding pledged by the IMF under
the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGFP) is now on hold and Sri
Lanka is looking once again at the bottom of the barrel.
|
Statement
by the co-chairs
June
1, 2004
The European Commission
Directorate General for External Relations
Brussels, June 1
Press
statement
In
a world of competing crises, Sri Lanka donor co-chairs came
together today and urged in the strongest possible terms a rapid
resumption of the peace negotiations so that Sri Lanka can benefit
from the generosity of the international community. They noted
that, with so many other demands on donors, donor attention and
funding might go elsewhere unless the peace process makes
progress.
The
co-chairs of the Tokyo Conference on Reconstruction and
Development of Sri Lanka (the United States, the European Union,
Japan and Norway) met in Brussels to further discuss their support
for the peace process following the April 2 elections in Sri
Lanka. They welcomed the recent commitments made by the government
and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) to resume peace
talks.
The
co-chairs looked forward to collaborating with the new United
People's Freedom Alliance government and welcomed President
Kumaratunga's initiative to start the process for the resumption
of the peace talks by calling on Norway to continue its role as
facilitator. The co-chairs commended the LTTE for reciprocating
the request to Norway and expressing their commitment to resume
the peace talks. They urged all political parties in Sri Lanka to
support these talks. The co-chairs also repeated their continued
full support to Norway's challenging task as facilitator.
The
co-chairs were pleased to note that, by and large, the ceasefire
has been upheld for more than two years with the assistance of the
Nordic Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission. But the co-chairs registered
rising concern with the number of killings in the east recently.
They condemned all such killings and called on both parties to do
their utmost to continue to respect and implement the ceasefire
agreement as the basis for the peace process. The co-chairs
welcomed the recent cooperation between the government and LTTE in
the eastern Batticaloa District, with the assistance of the Sri
Lanka Monitoring Mission, to improve the overall security
situation.
The
co-chairs are encouraged by the LTTE's release of child soldiers
and the continued commitment to work with UNICEF. The co-chairs
expressed their deep concern about reports of re-recruitments and
urged the LTTE to refrain from any further underage recruitment
and to release all remaining underage soldiers. In collaboration
with UNICEF, donors should consider providing funds for shelters
for those released children who have no homes to return to.
The
co-chairs emphasised the importance of preserving the gains made
in the earlier rounds of talks and called on the parties in the
peace process to bear in mind the principles of the Tokyo
Declaration. The co-chairs noted again that a peace settlement can
only be sustained if it respects the legitimate rights and
involvement of all ethnic groups, preserves the territorial
integrity of Sri Lanka and is based on the principles of democracy
and human rights. The co-chairs encouraged the parties to agree on
the modalities to invite a Muslim delegation to the peace talks at
an appropriate time for the deliberations on relevant substantive
political issues. The co-chairs also noted that success will
depend on the willingness of the parties to show political courage
and flexibility in discussions towards a peaceful solution.
The
peace process and the development process are mutually reinforcing
and interlinked, as agreed in the Tokyo Conference last year. As
such, the co-chairs stressed that there should be no drift and no
delay in resuming and taking forward the peace process. The
co-chairs called on donors to stand ready to accelerate
implementation of their Tokyo pledges once properly prepared peace
talks have resumed and noted that development assistance would
inevitably increase as the negotiations made progress. The
co-chairs recognised that such assistance should be extended to
the whole of the country, taking the poorest and the most conflict
ridden areas into particular account. It will of course be
necessary to continue providing humanitarian assistance wherever
it is required.
The
co-chairs also urged the government of Sri Lanka to adopt and
implement sound macro economic and development policies as well as
other necessary reforms.
In
addition, and until effective administrative structures are in
place in the north and east, the co-chairs encouraged the parties
to agree on the establishment of effective delivery mechanisms for
donor-financed development activities in the north and east. |
More
Stories....
|