First with the news and free with its views                                     First with the news and free with its views                             First with the news and free with its views                                    

News

 August 12, 2007  Volume 14, Issue 8


Focus

Spotlight

Letters

Issues

Now

Fashion

Editorial

Interviews

 

         

‘JHU has let down its voters’


Ven. Galabodatte Gnanasara Thero

Ven. Galabodatte Gnanasara Thero, one of the Buddhist monks who formed the Jathika Hela Urumaya (JHU) soon after the demise of Ven. Gangodawila Soma Thero says that the JHU has completely forgotten the pledges given to the people before the 2004 general election. In an interview with The Sunday Leader the monk said the lay leaders in the JHU are now controlling the party and some monks too have gone astray with the parliamentary privileges and perks which they earlier promised not to accept.

Excerpts of the interview:

By Nirmala Kannangara

Q: Do you approve of Buddhist monks entering mainstream politics?

A: Buddhist monks entering mainstream politics could be approved if they could prevent evil and unwholesome thoughts arising in the minds of the rulers and work towards banishing the evil thoughts already arisen, to produce and develop wholesome thoughts and try to promote and maintain the good thoughts already present. From the early days it was the duty of the monks to advise our rulers but never went on a collision course with them.

But as Buddhist monks we had to enter mainstream politics in 2004 considering the fact that the then government and the opposition did not walk on the righteous path for a better tomorrow. Instead the Buddhists of this country elected monks as their representatives to parliament to bring back the lost reputation of the country, but that has not had the desired effect.

Q: But Buddhist monks of Sri Lanka have been politically active always in one way or another. There was Ven. Kudahapola Thero who even brought down the British flag in defiance when the Kandyan Kingdom fell to the British. Isn’t it the same role that is being played by some monks?

A: There were many Buddhist monks like Ven. Saranankara Thero, Ven. Weedagama Thero, Ven Henpitagedara Gnanaseeha Thero and many more monks who worked tirelessly for the betterment of the country. Even now there are some monks who are determined to carry out the good work of those reputed monks of yesteryear. But unfortunately with the formation of the JHU the monks who were actively engaged in social service entered the political mainstream and went astray with the perks they received. Instead of implementing their pledges, to satisfy their needs and a comfortable life these innocent Buddhist monks had to abide by the orders of the lay leaders in the party. That was the downfall of the JHU and the Buddhist aspirations.

But those who could stand on their own feet immediately moved away from the party as well as active politics. That is why Ven. Kolonnawe Sumangala Thero gave up his parliamentary seat.

The JHU lay leaders whom we consider as ‘cardboard heroes’ are now ruining the party. Since these cardboard leaders emerged from nowhere, the people are now fed up of the party and even the elected representatives.

What happened to the Sihala Urumaya? The vote bank declined from 150,000 to 50,000 and the same would happen to the JHU at a future election. When Ven. Gangodawila Soma Thero came forward to rescue the nation and the religion it was the JVP and the JHU lay leaders who opposed it strongly.

But with the demise of Ven. Soma Thero they consolidated their vote bank over his body to enter parliament with a view to carrying forward Ven. Soma Thero’s ideas — however all their pledges have been only confined to words.

Q: Don’t you feel that Buddhist priests should play an advisory role than dabble in politics?

A: Of course yes. It was the Buddhist monks who always advised our rulers. They never went behind them for personal gain unlike today’s monks.

Q: In your view, is the JHU a political party, because it originally sought to create a Buddhist state and was seen more as a socially active religious group?

A: How can you consider the JHU a political party if they cannot fulfill the Buddhist aspirations which they promised to uphold before the 2004 election? Now they have become part and parcel of the government purely for personal benefit. With laymen joining the JHU parliamentary group and certain monks in parliament, the JHU has now become just a Marxist party.

Q: Do you think monks should be above reproach? If the public criticises a monk’s political action, does it amount to sinful conduct?

A: Naththi Loko Aninditho — There is no one in this universe who is of good repute all the time. Even Lord Buddha was accused of various things by certain people, but he was strong as a solid rock.

So being monks we should know how to face criticism more than laymen. If someone enters the political mainstream then he should know how to accept gain and losses, good repute and ill repute, praise and censure, pain and pleasure alike. If our JHU members say that they are strong Buddhists then they should cultivate equanimity in life. Amidst blame and praise, success and failure they should be firm as a concrete block. So if the JHU members have cultivated self reliance they should not be confronting others; instead they should face the vicissitudes of life with a brave heart.

There is nothing wrong if people point out the faults of monks and vise versa. Especially we as Buddhist monks should refrain from hatred but it is sad to note the JHU members do not know what metta, karuna, mudhitha and upekka is. Instead they only know hatred and jealously. That is why they are slandering those who oppose their ideology.

Q: According to what we know, the JHU originally was created with the intention of electing lay people to political office. But due to the popularity of certain monks, the decision was reversed and monks were elected. Is this position correct?

A: Absolutely. Other than Tilak Karunaratne all the other lay leaders of the Hela Urumaya wanted to win votes over the Tamil issue. But later they knew that it was not successful and saw how people flocked round Ven. Soma Thero and myself since we were on a mission against unethical conversions.

We held Bodu Samulu and Ama Wessa which gathered Buddhists in their thousands from all over the country under one roof; and these cunning lay leaders knew that our concept was the only way to achieve their goals and invited reputed monks of the calibre of Ven. Dr. Medhananda Thero to join the political mainstream to bring an anti conversion bill to halt unethical conversion.

Q: There is a raging controversy about the sale of a luxury Mercedes Benz car belonging to JHU Leader Ven. Ellawala Medhananda Thero. The JHU has openly admitted to selling the duty free car permits obtained by the monk parliamentarians which is illegal. Do you justify the sale of car permits, which are meant for their personal use, to raise funds for the party?

A: No, I cannot justify what they have done. Before entering parliament it was Ven. Medhananda Thero who pledged not to accept any parliamentary privileges. But now they have acted against their own promises. Although Ven. Rathana Thero and H.M.G.B. Kotakadeniya have admitted that the JHU monk parliamentarians have sold their duty free vehicle permits, it is hilarious to note how Udaya Gammanpila denies it.

Anyhow now the JHU is trying to convince the public that they have sold the permits to support the innocents in the north and east. If that is their theology, then we have to accept if Kudu Naufer says that he sell drugs to help the down trodden in society.

It is sad to note that the JHU members have sold their vehicle permits, in which case, as true Buddhist monks they should have accepted their mistake before the people. Why are they still trying to cover up the whole issue? It is not good for Buddhist monks to lie.

Q: The JHU like the JVP supports the militaristic approach of the government. Can the ethnic issue be solved through war?

A: The government’s first priority should be to bring the terrorists to the negotiating table failing which fighting against them is not wrong.

Ours is a small country and we have to abide by the international rules and regulations.

But the JVP and JHU stances are quite different to the others. They accuse the superpower of interfering in our internal affairs during the day but meet them over a meal in the evening. These are the double standards adopted by these two extremist parties.

Q: Is it correct for a political party that seeks to espouse the cause of Buddhism to promote the concept of war and inadvertently, the taking of many lives?

A: No.

Q: In general, isn’t there now a tendency to lull monks into a cushy life by some of the dayakayas by bestowing on them very expensive and consumerist gifts that are in violation of the austere living practiced and promoted by the Buddha and enforced upon the Maha Sangha?

A: This is totally against the Buddhist doctrine. Monks should not accept any gifts from laymen.

Q: Udaya Gammanpila says that the JHU’s foremost intention is to cut short the Opposition Leader’s political life at the earliest. Don’t you think that taking revenge is strictly against the Buddhist doctrine?

A: Certainly yes, if you are a true Buddhist there is no room for revenge. Is this how the JHU is going to create a Dharmarajya. They preach one thing but do another thing. This alone shows the hatred some so called JHU leaders — mainly the laymen — are sowing instead of the four sublime states of metta - loving kindness, karuna - compassion, muditha - sympathetic or appreciative joy and upekkha - equanimity.

Q: Are there any threats to your life as you are against the way the JHU is now acting?

A: Yes, since I came out strongly against the present JHU’s state of affairs I have received many death threats which I am not scared of. I am not a coward. Only those who are engaging in cowardly acts cannot come before me. I am ready to face life’s intricacies as a practicing Buddhist who loves the country and the religion but nothing else.

The same cowards are now engaging in character assassination. My devotees know who I am, so does my conscience. This is not the first instance that these so called JHU lay leaders tarnished the good names of monks. Earlier they attacked Ven. Uduwe Dhammaloka Thero, then Ven. Kolonnawe Sri Sumangala Thero and now I am at the receiving end. Such things will not stop me. This situation will continue as long as they take refuge with the government. There is no longevity for sinful acts..

 


 


©Leader Publications (Pvt) Ltd.
24, Katukurunduwatte Road, Ratmalana Sri Lanka
Tel : +94-75-365891,2 Fax : +94-75-365891
email :
editor@thesundayleader.lk