Ven.
Galabodatte Gnanasara Thero, one of
the Buddhist monks who formed the
Jathika Hela Urumaya (JHU) soon after
the demise of Ven. Gangodawila Soma
Thero says that the JHU has completely
forgotten the pledges given to the
people before the 2004 general
election. In an interview with The
Sunday Leader the monk said the
lay leaders in the JHU are now
controlling the party and some monks
too have gone astray with the
parliamentary privileges and perks
which they earlier promised not to
accept.
Excerpts of
the interview:
By Nirmala
Kannangara
Q: Do you
approve of Buddhist monks entering
mainstream politics?
A:
Buddhist
monks entering mainstream politics
could be approved if they could
prevent evil and unwholesome thoughts
arising in the minds of the rulers and
work towards banishing the evil
thoughts already arisen, to produce
and develop wholesome thoughts and try
to promote and maintain the good
thoughts already present. From the
early days it was the duty of the
monks to advise our rulers but never
went on a collision course with them.
But as
Buddhist monks we had to enter
mainstream politics in 2004
considering the fact that the then
government and the opposition did not
walk on the righteous path for a
better tomorrow. Instead the Buddhists
of this country elected monks as their
representatives to parliament to bring
back the lost reputation of the
country, but that has not had the
desired effect.
Q: But
Buddhist monks of Sri Lanka have been
politically active always in one way
or another. There was Ven. Kudahapola
Thero who even brought down the
British flag in defiance when the
Kandyan Kingdom fell to the British.
Isn’t it the same role that is being
played by some monks?
A:
There were
many Buddhist monks like Ven.
Saranankara Thero, Ven. Weedagama
Thero, Ven Henpitagedara Gnanaseeha
Thero and many more monks who worked
tirelessly for the betterment of the
country. Even now there are some monks
who are determined to carry out the
good work of those reputed monks of
yesteryear. But unfortunately with the
formation of the JHU the monks who
were actively engaged in social
service entered the political
mainstream and went astray with the
perks they received. Instead of
implementing their pledges, to satisfy
their needs and a comfortable life
these innocent Buddhist monks had to
abide by the orders of the lay leaders
in the party. That was the downfall of
the JHU and the Buddhist aspirations.
But those who
could stand on their own feet
immediately moved away from the party
as well as active politics. That is
why Ven. Kolonnawe Sumangala Thero
gave up his parliamentary seat.
The JHU lay
leaders whom we consider as ‘cardboard
heroes’ are now ruining the party.
Since these cardboard leaders emerged
from nowhere, the people are now fed
up of the party and even the elected
representatives.
What happened
to the Sihala Urumaya? The vote bank
declined from 150,000 to 50,000 and
the same would happen to the JHU at a
future election. When Ven. Gangodawila
Soma Thero came forward to rescue the
nation and the religion it was the JVP
and the JHU lay leaders who opposed it
strongly.
But with the
demise of Ven. Soma Thero they
consolidated their vote bank over his
body to enter parliament with a view
to carrying forward Ven. Soma Thero’s
ideas — however all their pledges have
been only confined to words.
Q: Don’t you
feel that Buddhist priests should play
an advisory role than dabble in
politics?
A:
Of course yes. It was the Buddhist
monks who always advised our rulers.
They never went behind them for
personal gain unlike today’s monks.
Q: In your
view, is the JHU a political party,
because it originally sought to create
a Buddhist state and was seen more as
a socially active religious group?
A:
How can you
consider the JHU a political party if
they cannot fulfill the Buddhist
aspirations which they promised to
uphold before the 2004 election? Now
they have become part and parcel of
the government purely for personal
benefit. With laymen joining the JHU
parliamentary group and certain monks
in parliament, the JHU has now become
just a Marxist party.
Q: Do you
think monks should be above reproach?
If the public criticises a monk’s
political action, does it amount to
sinful conduct?
A:
Naththi Loko Aninditho — There
is no one in this universe who is of
good repute all the time. Even Lord
Buddha was accused of various things
by certain people, but he was strong
as a solid rock.
So being
monks we should know how to face
criticism more than laymen. If someone
enters the political mainstream then
he should know how to accept gain and
losses, good repute and ill repute,
praise and censure, pain and pleasure
alike. If our JHU members say that
they are strong Buddhists then they
should cultivate equanimity in life.
Amidst blame and praise, success and
failure they should be firm as a
concrete block. So if the JHU members
have cultivated self reliance they
should not be confronting others;
instead they should face the
vicissitudes of life with a brave
heart.
There is
nothing wrong if people point out the
faults of monks and vise versa.
Especially we as Buddhist monks should
refrain from hatred but it is sad to
note the JHU members do not know what
metta, karuna,
mudhitha and upekka is.
Instead they only know hatred and
jealously. That is why they are
slandering those who oppose their
ideology.
Q: According
to what we know, the JHU originally
was created with the intention of
electing lay people to political
office. But due to the popularity of
certain monks, the decision was
reversed and monks were elected. Is
this position correct?
A:
Absolutely.
Other than Tilak Karunaratne all
the other lay leaders of the Hela
Urumaya wanted to win votes over the
Tamil issue. But later they knew that
it was not successful and saw how
people flocked round Ven. Soma Thero
and myself since we were on a mission
against unethical conversions.
We held
Bodu Samulu and Ama Wessa
which gathered Buddhists in their
thousands from all over the country
under one roof; and these cunning lay
leaders knew that our concept was the
only way to achieve their goals and
invited reputed monks of the calibre
of Ven. Dr. Medhananda Thero to join
the political mainstream to bring an
anti conversion bill to halt unethical
conversion.
Q: There is a
raging controversy about the sale of a
luxury Mercedes Benz car belonging to
JHU Leader Ven. Ellawala Medhananda
Thero. The JHU has openly admitted to
selling the duty free car permits
obtained by the monk parliamentarians
which is illegal. Do you justify the
sale of car permits, which are meant
for their personal use, to raise funds
for the party?
A:
No, I cannot
justify what they have done. Before
entering parliament it was Ven.
Medhananda Thero who pledged not to
accept any parliamentary privileges.
But now they have acted against their
own promises. Although Ven. Rathana
Thero and H.M.G.B. Kotakadeniya have
admitted that the JHU monk
parliamentarians have sold their duty
free vehicle permits, it is hilarious
to note how Udaya Gammanpila denies
it.
Anyhow now
the JHU is trying to convince the
public that they have sold the permits
to support the innocents in the north
and east. If that is their theology,
then we have to accept if Kudu Naufer
says that he sell drugs to help the
down trodden in society.
It is sad to
note that the JHU members have sold
their vehicle permits, in which case,
as true Buddhist monks they should
have accepted their mistake before the
people. Why are they still trying to
cover up the whole issue? It is not
good for Buddhist monks to lie.
Q: The JHU
like the JVP supports the militaristic
approach of the government. Can the
ethnic issue be solved through war?
A:
The government’s first priority should
be to bring the terrorists to the
negotiating table failing which
fighting against them is not wrong.
Ours is a
small country and we have to abide by
the international rules and
regulations.
But the JVP
and JHU stances are quite different to
the others. They accuse the superpower
of interfering in our internal affairs
during the day but meet them over a
meal in the evening. These are the
double standards adopted by these two
extremist parties.
Q: Is it
correct for a political party that
seeks to espouse the cause of Buddhism
to promote the concept of war and
inadvertently, the taking of many
lives?
A:
No.
Q: In
general, isn’t there now a tendency to
lull monks into a cushy life by some
of the dayakayas by bestowing
on them very expensive and consumerist
gifts that are in violation of the
austere living practiced and promoted
by the Buddha and enforced upon the
Maha Sangha?
A:
This is
totally against the Buddhist doctrine.
Monks should not accept any gifts from
laymen.
Q: Udaya
Gammanpila says that the JHU’s
foremost intention is to cut short the
Opposition Leader’s political life at
the earliest. Don’t you think that
taking revenge is strictly against the
Buddhist doctrine?
A:
Certainly
yes, if you are a true Buddhist there
is no room for revenge. Is this how
the JHU is going to create a
Dharmarajya. They preach one thing
but do another thing. This alone shows
the hatred some so called JHU leaders
— mainly the laymen — are sowing
instead of the four sublime states of
metta - loving kindness,
karuna - compassion, muditha
- sympathetic or appreciative joy
and upekkha - equanimity.
Q: Are there
any threats to your life as you are
against the way the JHU is now acting?
A:
Yes, since I came out strongly against
the present JHU’s state of affairs I
have received many death threats which
I am not scared of. I am not a coward.
Only those who are engaging in
cowardly acts cannot come before me. I
am ready to face life’s intricacies as
a practicing Buddhist who loves the
country and the religion but nothing
else.
The same
cowards are now engaging in character
assassination. My devotees know who I
am, so does my conscience. This is not
the first instance that these so
called JHU lay leaders tarnished the
good names of monks. Earlier they
attacked Ven. Uduwe Dhammaloka Thero,
then Ven. Kolonnawe Sri Sumangala
Thero and now I am at the receiving
end. Such things will not stop me.
This situation will continue as long
as they take refuge with the
government. There is no longevity for
sinful acts..