Unbound And Unafraid                                                                       Unbound And Unafraid                                                                       Unbound And Unafraid                                                                       Unbound And Unafraid                                                                      Unbound And Unafraid                                                                      Unbound And Unafraid                                                                       Unbound And Unafraid


Home

News

Politics

Spotlight

Defence

Parliament

Focus

Economy

Arts

Letters

World Affairs

Serendipity

Thelma

This is Paradise


Business

Review

Sports

 

 Issues  

 Bitter infighting pushes Sumithrayo to brink of closure


The Sumithrayo Head Office, at
Horton Place, Colombo 7 and
(inset) Douglas Devananda

By Nirmala Kannangara

Allegations of malpractice, corruption, fraud and inefficiency have shaken Sri Lanka Sumithrayo — a government incorporated charity body created by an Act of Parliament, which aids the depressed, suicidal and alcohol addicted.

Three members of Sumithrayo’s Colombo South Branch, namely Maj. Gen. Sathischandra Jayasundara, Surakshi Siriwardena and Udeepa Pieris wrote to Social Services Minister, Douglas Devananda, urging him to appoint an interim council to run the charity.

In a similar letter sent by the same signatories to Presidential Advisor Basil Rajapakse, the Colombo South Sumithrayo members alleged that "the Chairman and Council of Management of Sri Lanka Sumithrayo" run the charity "as if it is their private business rather than a public institution."

Financial affairs

They further told the officials in their letter that Sumithrayo’s financial affairs were "not in order," charging that "vast sums of money" were being stashed up at this "non profit making organisation."

When volunteer members inquire about accounting irregularities, they wrote, they are "asked to go home or are forced and pressured into resigning." Adding that "there is no transparency and accountability," the officials were hoping that Minister Devananda would invoke his privilege "in keeping with Parliament Act No. 31 of 1980" and appoint an interim council to replace the current management, bringing the house to order.

The letter carried several attachments detailing the allegations: discrepancies in the management structure, volunteer abuse, financial mismanagement and alleged illegal reappointment of officials dismissed for malpractice.

To begin with, Sumithrayo was set up over 34 years ago, yet still has only 11 branches, all of which are located in major towns and cities.

This is seen by many seasoned volunteers and mental health workers as wasteful, since the majority of cases of depression and suicide are thought to occur in rural areas.

Only in towns

"It is a well known fact that most of the suicidal and depressed are from very remote villages in the country," a long time counsellor told The Sunday Leader. "So it is pointless putting Sumithrayo branches in major towns."

The current Acting Chairman of Sumithrayo’s National Council (or main decision making body), Anura Wijemanne, is a former volunteer from Sumithrayo’s Colombo South Branch. Wijemanne was removed from the branch by its Management Council, along with a fellow volunteer named Dharme, who was the acting treasurer.

Their removal was communicated to Sumithrayo’s National Council by a letter dated December 28, 2007, signed by two directors of the Colombo South Branch.

The reasons cited for removing Wijemanne were "undermining the work" of the management council and "conduct unbecoming of a Sumithrayo volunteer," with reference to an attached letter of complaint.

The complaint by a female director of the Colombo South Branch, claimed that Wijemanne had forced her into a room, attempted to force her resignation and threatened her with assault — an allegation that Wijemanne has ferociously denied.

Reason for removal

The reason cited for removing Dharme, who served as treasurer of the Colombo South branch of Sumithrayo, was that he was "refusing to hand over accounts" to the new treasurer "after he was given plenty of notice both verbally and in writing," and "refusing to carry out an internal audit."

Allegedly, the "Chairperson and Council of Management" had instructed Dharme to perform an audit, yet he had not complied.

After Dharme and Anura Wijemanne had been removed, the management of the Colombo South Branch filed a police complaint against Dharme, in an attempt to force him to produce accounts files that were said to be missing.

The ensuing fracas between the police, Management Council and two dismissed volunteers led ultimately to the temporary closure of Sumithrayo’s Colombo South Branch.

With the bickering intense on both sides, all that is for certain is that it is those who seek Sumithrayo and who depend on its activities, who lose, at the end of the day.

The drama continued in a style that would put even our politicians to shame. A Special General Meeting of the Colombo South Branch of Sumithrayo was held at the organisation’s Horton Place office, on January 13.

Reinstated

At this meeting it was decided that Anura Wijemanne’s and Dharme’s sackings were illegal, and they were, in their presence, reinstated to the Management Council. A proposal was taken to move a vote of no confidence against the two directors who fired Wijemanne and Dharme, and the meeting was adjourned.

Yet it turned out not long afterwards that there was a teeny little snag in the proceedings of the January 13 meeting. The meeting was attended by just 32 out of the Colombo South branch’s 60 volunteers. According to the standing rules of that branch, the quorum required for a meeting to convene is two thirds of the total number of volunteers, which in this case would have been 40.

With the deadlock continuing, Colombo South remains without an operational Sumithrayo centre. The true tragedy in all this is that neither camp in the Sumithrayo fighting can be too burdened by the lack of infrastructure and facilities, a plight that affects mainly those who are served by organisations such as Sumithrayo.

We only act on fraud, not corruption – SSP

SSP, Police Fraud Investigations Bureau Arlis told The Sunday Leader that the Fraud Investigation Bureau could act on any fraud but if it is pertaining to bribery or corruption the complaint should be lodged with the Bribery and Corruption Commission .

 

Acting Chairman refutes all allegations

According to Wijemanne he refutes all the allegations levelled agains t him and the National Council and told The Sunday Leader that he does not want to tarnish the image of the organisation as Sumithrayo is considered to be one of the best, transparent social service institutions in the country.

"How could anybody claim that Sumithrayo is tainted with bribery and corruption. Our annual report alone could speak volumes of our transparency," Wijemanne said.

 

Ministry Secretary confirms ‘appropriate’ action will be taken

All attempts to contact Director NGO, Social Services and Social Welfare, Douglas Nanayakkara to acertain as to what action they have taken in regard to the complaint made by Sumithrayo Colomo South failed.

However Ministry Additional Secreatry Sunil Samaraweera confirmed to The Sunday Leader that he had forwarded the complaint to Director NGO and said that appropriate action would be taken to hold an inquiry.

 

The making of Sumithrayo

Formed in 1974, Sri Lanka Sumithrayo was incorporated by an Act of Parliament No. 10 of 1986, as a branch of Befrienders International.

Sumithrayo was integrated as a government-approved charity organisation by Gazette notification 359 of July 19, 1985. The general objective of Sumithrayo is to help the lonely, depressed and suicidal by providing emotional support and therapy.

Sumithrayo has come under fire since despite operating for over 34 years, it still operates only 11 branches, all of which are in urban areas. Having all its branches (and less than a dozen of them) concentrated in towns and cities seems contrary to the institution’s mandate, since most occurrences of depression and suicide are recorded in rural areas.

 

‘Bribery Com. entertains complaints only against government depts and officers’

Bribery Commission Director Nevil Guruge told The Sunday Leader that the Commission to Investigate Bribery and Corruption entertains complaints only against government departments and public officers and not against private companies or NGOs in the country.

"According to our act we only could take action against the government departments and public servants but not private companies or NGOs," Guruge added.

When queried as to whom the general public could turn to in order to prevent bribery and corruption Guruge said that they could lodge a complaint with the police.


©Leader Publications (Pvt) Ltd.
24, Katukurunduwatte Road, Ratmalana Sri Lanka
Tel : +94-75-365891,2 Fax : +94-75-365891
email :
editor@thesundayleader.lk