By Mandana Ismail Abeywickrema
Weak
economic policies based on heavy state
expenditure including the distribution of
indiscriminate subsidies have pushed the
country's economy into peril with Sri Lanka
now having the highest inflation and
interest rates in the region.
Heavy
state expenditure has been identified as the
bane of the country's economy. However,
analysts say that the cash strapped
government is now left with not many avenues
of finding money for its coffers.
The
high inflation rate has made it impossible
for the government to even consider money
printing as an option while the credit
downgrading has had an adverse impact on the
government's plan to borrow money in the
overseas market.
The
loose fiscal policies followed by the
government with regard to money printing has
been identified as the cause for the
increase in inflation, which now stands at
28.2%. The present rate of 28.2% is
according to the new index that replaced the
old index, which recorded a near 30%
inflation rate in April this year.
Waste
of public funds
Unfortunately,
amidst the serious economic issues the
government has not shown any interest in
minimising unnecessary state expenditure and
continues to waste public funds at great
cost to the country's economy.
Apart
from the high fund allocation for defence,
the excessive expenditure on maintaining the
world's largest cabinet as well as on other
wasteful endeavours, especially when the
government has turned down a request by the
working masses for a wage increase citing
lack of funds smacks of weak financial
management.
It
has been reported that a cabinet minister,
non-cabinet minister and a deputy minister
are each entitled to two official vehicles
and two back-up security vehicles. However
it is an open secret that every minister
uses a minimum 10-15 vehicles apart from the
back-up vehicles.
Leader
of the House, Health Minister Nimal Siripala
de Silva responding to a question raised by
JVP Parliamentarian Ranaweera Pathirana,
told parliament recently that the six Nation
Building Ministers were using 43 vehicles,
incurring a staggering monthly fuel bill of
Rs.752, 500.
Astronomical
cost
According
to de Silva, the ministers using these
vehicles were Jagath Pushpakumara, Susantha
Punchinilame, Saliya Dissanayake, Rohitha
Abeygunawardene, S.M. Chandrasena and
Gunaratne Weerakoon.
All
cabinet ministers receive a basic salary of
Rs.65, 000 while a non-cabinet minister and
a deputy minister receive Rs.63, 500. A
parliamentarian receives a basic salary of
Rs.54, 285. All of them receive a host of
additional allowances.
Apart
from the basic salary an allowance of Rs.500
is paid for each parliamentary sitting and
Rs.200 for attending a select committee
meeting. Depending on how many days they
attend parliament sessions and select
committee meetings the allowances vary and
the final package that a parliamentarian
receives is more than Rs.100, 000 per month.
Ministers and deputies receive over
Rs.130,000.
Unlimited
facilities
Further,
every cabinet and non-cabinet minister is
entitled to a monthly fuel allowance of
Rs.75,000, a deputy minister is entitled to
Rs.50,000 and
parliamentarians are entitled to
Rs.29,000 depending on the distance to
his/her constituency, before the recent
price hike.
According
to the Public Administration and Home
Affairs Ministry, Rs.20,000 is paid for a
private land phone and Rs.10,000 for a
mobile phone in addition to unlimited local
and IDD facilities for official telephones
every month.
Ministers
are entitled to two drivers but these rules
change depending on the number of vehicles.
Most of the ministers employ their kith and
kin as their private secretaries,
coordinating secretaries and public
relations officers.
In
addition every cabinet, non-cabinet and
deputy minister is entitled to four
secretaries. They are all entitled to
official vehicles, fuel and telephone
allowances and a limited entertainment
allowance.
The
government also spends Rs.100, 000 on an
official residence for a minister.
Legislators
who occupy the Summit Flats pay Rs.6,000
while occupants at the Madiwela Housing
Complex and in Colombo 7 pay Rs. 2,900 and
Rs. 8,000 respectively, as rent.
The
electricity and water bills too are borne by
the state. Ministers who occupy official
residences in Colombo pay only Rs.2000 for
maintenance and their water, electricity and
all other maintenance bills are met by the
state.
The
government responding to the charge of
spending colossal sums of money on
maintaining the large number of ministers,
has said that it is a negligible amount
compared to the total state expenditure.
Small
component
Consumer
Affairs Minister Bandula Gunawardena told
The Sunday Leader that the money spent on
ministers was a small component when
compared with what is spent on paying the
public sector salary and pension bill.
"The
public sector salary bill, at Rs. 233
billion, is the largest bill," he said.
Meanwhile,
speaking at a political talk show, Minister
Rajitha Senaratne said that the money spent
on maintaining the ministers was 1.8% of
GDP.
According
to former JVP parliamentarian and the
party's trade union wing leader Wasantha
Samarasinghe, although the exact amount
spent has not been calculated fully and if
as told by Senaratne the amount was 1.8% of
the GDP, it was equivalent to the total
government spending on one of the key
sectors in the country - the education
sector.
It
is in this backdrop that it was revealed in
parliament last week that the government has
imported 31 bulletproof vehicles for the use
of parliamentarians at a cost of US$ 8.6
million.
Chief
Government Whip Dinesh Gunawardena made the
disclosure to parliament responding to a
question by UNP Parliamentarian Ravi
Karunanayake.
Massive
spending on vehicles
According
to the official response, 15 of these
vehicles had been bought for 3.7 million
Euros inclusive of duty, 12 for 1.8 million
US dollars, and four for 1.3 million US
dollars.
The
government also informed parliament last
week of the massive supplementary estimate
for over Rs. 2,800 million to finance the
upcoming SAARC Summit scheduled to be held
from July 27 to August 3 in Colombo.
The
amount, according to the breakdown is Rs.
401,881,272 for recurrent expenditure and Rs.
2,478,299,069 for capital expenditure and
totals to Rs. 2,880,180,332.
Interestingly,
Sri Lanka decided to host the event even
though it is the turn of the Maldives to
host it, which in turn has raised the
question as to why the government has opted
to fork out such a large amount of money at
a time the state coffers are begging for
money and borrowing at astronomical rates
from commercial banks.
Also,
the government's decision to hold two
provincial council polls before the
stipulated time for the elections is to cost
the government an additional Rs. 400
million. It has been reported that the
preliminary election work would cost the
government up to Rs. 110 million while
spending a sum of Rs. 90 million on the
police, postal facilities and printing.
Public
servants' wages and pension bill
According
to Gunawardena, all these expenses put
together would still form only a small part
of the total government expenditure.
He
reiterated that the real drain on the state
coffers was the high wage and pension bill.
It
has been reported that of each tax rupee
earned by the government, 55 cents is spent
on paying public sector salaries. A sector
that contributes very little to national
productivity.
Gunawardena
also said that if the government were to
heed the workers' demand and grant a salary
hike of Rs. 5,000, the salary bill would see
a further increase of Rs. 72 billion.
"The
only option then would be for the government
to print money, as it does not have such a
lot of money to grant a salary hike. Heeding
the demands would mean printing money and
allow inflation to go out of control,"
he said.
Economists
while not recommending a salary hike at the
present time, given the unhealthy economic
conditions faced by the country say that the
government needs to cut down on wasteful
expenditure in order to maintain a balance
and tighten monetary policy.
According
to economist Dr. Harsha de Silva, granting a
salary hike would push the country in to
spiral inflation. However, he said that
given the high cost of living the demands of
the workers could not be considered unfair.
"The
salary increase has in fact
been demanded due to the expectation
of inflation rising still further in the
future," he said.
The
only solutions before the government as
pointed out by Dr. de Silva is to minimise
wasteful expenditure, further tighten fiscal
policies and show a slow down in inflation
in order to build confidence in the people's
mind that the economy can be saved from the
disaster it is heading for.
|
Raw
deal for EPF contributors
The
Employees' Provident Fund (EPF), the
country's main private sector retirement
fund, has been badly affected by the actions
of the Central Bank that manages the
account.
Economists
say that although the bank is expected to
give 4% over the GDP deflator to the EPF, it
has been around zero or negative in the past
few years.
According
to economist Dr. Harsha de Silva, the bank
had contributed 4% to the account in 2002
and 7% in 2003. Since then it has been
negative and has eroded the account.
"The
EPF is now ruined," he said.
Dr.
de Silva said that the EPF Act of 1958
outlines that a minimum return of 2.5% be
given by the Central Bank.
"According
to the law, if the government cannot make
the payment, it needs to be included in the
budgetary allocations. But today, in real
terms it is negative and has eroded,"
he said.
Apart
from the negative wage increases recorded by
the private sector workers, they have also
been hit badly due to the losses incurred by
the EPF.
It
has been reported that the EPF has lost Rs.
23 billion in real terms in 2007 due to the
increase in inflation. The Central Bank's
handling of the EPF has also been criticised
due to the billions lost by the fund.
EPF
used to inflate away debt
It
has been alleged that the fund recorded the
loss since the government utilised the
system to inflate away debt.
Statistics
given in the Central Bank Annual Report for
2007 reveal that in 2007 the level of
inflation as recorded by the CCPI stood at
over 16% while the rate of return to members
of the EPF stood at 11.40%, which created a
real loss of 5%.
According
to economic analysts, it is bad management
at its worst.
Analysts
say that although there have been a
discussion for some time on the issue, no
final solution has been forthcoming.
According
to economists, while the Central Bank on the
one hand has to manage the debt of the
government it is also trying to raise the
cheapest funds for the state on the other
and has to maintain the EPF, which is to
give positive returns to the fund members.
"There
is a huge conflict of interest," an
economist said, adding that the management
of the EPF has to be freed from the Central
Bank.
It
has also been reported that the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) has also
called for the independent governance of the
EPF.
|