Sumal: Laughing all the way to the bank
Original owners get Rs. 312 pp,
Sumal gets 600,000 pp
Sumal says lawyers told him not
to speak to media
Land owners undervalue purchase price
and send money to Hong Kong account
20 perch blocks sold for Rs. 12 m while
some undervalued on paper
By Sonali Samarasinghe
While the landmark Kotte Golf Course
Judgment delivered by a pumped up Supreme
Court last month smacked modest fines of Rs.
3 million, Rs.2 million and Rs. 1 million on
former President Chandrika Kumaratunga, her
long time ally Ronnie Peiris and the three
original shareholders of Asia Pacific Golf
Course Ltd., respectively, business tycoon
and Access Group Chief Sumal Perera, once
dubbed Komis Kakka by the former chief
executive may be laughing all the way to the
bank.
Early last month Sri Lanka's Supreme Court
made history yet again when it ordered that
the Water's Edge Golf Course and Club house
and all surrounding land including the
residencies be handed over to the UDA to be
used for the original public purpose for
which it was acquired.
The court held the land was knowingly,
deliberately and manipulatively sold to a
private entrepreneur through a process that
was conniving and contrary to the
Fundamental Rights of the people and that
the transaction reeked of corruption. It
also noted that Kumaratunga's friend Ronnie
Peiris had obtained a sum of Rs. 60 million
in profit from this transaction.
Unscathed
Meanwhile Sumal Perera came out of court
relatively unscathed. His biggest windfall
will perhaps come from the 105 plots of land
some 20 perches each for the construction of
100 luxury holiday villas on stilts, most of
which Perera hawked in 2003 and 2004 to
private buyers at a price of over Rs. 12
million per lot - that's Rs. 600,000 a
perch.
While some paid Rs. 12 million direct to
Asia Pacific Golf Course Ltd., a company
wholly taken over by Sumal Perera from the
original owners on June 17, 2003 and such
payment was reflected in the deed as the
full consideration for the transfer, other
buyers allegedly undervalued the payment
reflected on the Deed but claimed they were
requested to send the rest of the money to
an account owned by Sumal Perera in Hong
Kong.
Foreign account
For instance some undervalued their purchase
amount by reflecting Rs.5 million on the
deed but deposited the rest of the Rs. 12
million - that is Rs. 7 million in a bank
account in
Hong Kong.
It is learnt the account name was
Transcontinental Investments (Pvt) Ltd., a
company owned by Sumal Perera.
Transcontinental is situated on the 18th
floor, Lincolan House,
Taikoo Place, No.
979, Kings Road, Quarrbay, Hong Kong.
Transcontinental
But let's put Transcontinental Investments
into perspective. Recall that Sumal Perera
in June 2003 bought out the fly by night
company Asia Pacific Gold Course Ltd.,
specifically set up to receive massive
swathes of government land at concessionary
rates and terms, from its original owners
Siva and Suen Selvaratnam and Shantha
Wijesinghe.
The total investment capital of this company
was Rs. 68.2 million. There were 35
shareholders. Sumal Perera invested 16.8
million, Transcontinental Investments Pvt.
Ltd., invested Rs. 28.2 million, Access
Agencies Pvt. Ltd., some Rs. 10.4 million
and Access Engineering (Pvt.) Ltd., Rs. 5
million thus coming to a total of Rs. 60.5
million. The rest of the 31 shareholders
invested Rs. 7.7 million.
The biggest investment came of course from
Transcontinental, a company allegedly owned
by Sumal Perera.
Sources close to the buyers claim that many
buyers siphoned their purchase consideration
to this fund. Already The Sunday Leader
learns that two buyers deposited Rs.24
million and Rs.7 million respectively while
their transfer deeds reflected an
undervalued amount less than Rs.12 million
per 20 perch block.
Investigating account
The issue is this. What exactly is this
account run by a company owned by Sumal
Perera and was it the account that paid out
Rs. 60 million to Ronnie Peiris? If so a
simple investigation into the activity of
this account by the Bribery Commission may
perchance reveal uncomfortable details and
shore up a long list of beneficiaries who
received seemingly untraceable funds from
this account.
Afterall it is no secret Sumal Perera plays
banker to many politicians of every hue in
exchange for favours while in office.
For the Bribery Commission already directed
by court to conduct a full inquiry into the
dealings of several of the respondents in
this case this account may prove a good
starting point.
Note also this. According to the judgment
itself the original shareholders of Asia
Pacific were holding the majority of shares
in the company in trust for Ronnie Peiris
described by court as a man who procured and
peddled executive favours. The profit Ronnie
Peiris derived from the sale of the company
to Access was therefore Rs. 57.2 million as
he was the beneficial owner of 600,020
shares at Rs. 10 per share. At the time
Access bought into 50% of the company in
2002, Asia Pacific only had a paid up
capital of Rs. 15 million.
Some buyers are livid. "Sumal utilised our
money for other development and he is
getting compensation while we are taken to
the cleaners," they accuse.
Crucial meeting
Indeed 20 of the buyers were to call up the
Access Chairman after the court order and
demand a meeting.
Accordingly the buyers met with Sumal Perera
at the Water's Edge Club House and demanded
to know the situation. Perera had been
defiant. "Don't come after me," he had
allegedly said. "I am taking this matter up
in the Hague. I will get this land back," he
allegedly claimed. "I will get the Minister
to divest the land to the original owners
and then buy it off them with the money I
get."
"Don't come after me," he had reiterated
laughing almost hysterically according to
one land owner. "I'm only Sumal. You go
after Asia Pacific. I have to pay many
debts. I have to pay Nawaloka
Construction." he had allegedly said.
He also offered the land owners to become
creditors of Asia Pacific, an offer they
could easily refuse.
The Sunday Leader attempted to get a comment
from Sumal Perera on all these matters but
he declined his privilege for right of
reply.
It is following this meeting that several
land owners decided they would take legal
action. Accordingly last Thursday (13) they
sent Letters of Demand to the Chairman, Asia
Pacific Golf Course Ltd., and to the UDA
demanding damages in a sum of Rs. 44 million
estimated as the current market value of the
land.
Legal action
The Letters of Demand sent by Attorney At
Law G.G. Arulpragasam stated as follows
inter alia -
"Subsequent to the such pronouncement of the
said judgment by the Supreme Court, my
client has lost all rights, title and
entitlements to the said land and other
rights despite my client having fully paid
and settled all the sums of money and
consideration related to the transaction
between my client, you and Urban Development
Authority.
"I am instructed by my client to write to
you, you having the full knowledge and
access to the real nature of the transaction
between you and Urban Development Authority
have suppressed and misrepresented material
facts in inducing and luring my client to
purchase the said land for a valuable
consideration and thus defrauded my client.
By doing so you have unjustly enriched at
the expense of my client wherein you without
holding legal and lawful title to the
property has collected large sums of money
from my client. I am instructed by my client
to write to you specifically taking up the
position that your company has defrauded my
client.
"I am instructed by my client to write to
you in view of the aforesaid findings of the
Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist
Republic of Sri Lanka and consequences of
such findings, it is now apparent you acting
in collusion with the said Urban Development
Authority without having any legal and
lawful right title and interest to the said
lot of land have sold and transferred the
aforesaid allotment of land for valuable
consideration and specifically agreed as
aforesaid to warrant and defend the title."
What Sumal Perera gets
Here's the deal as far as Sumal Perera and
the October judgment is concerned. The total
extent of 225 acres of land on which is
situated the Golf Course, the club house and
the plots of land for luxury villas must now
revert to the UDA. However in consideration
of the construction of buildings by Asia
Pacific Golf Course Ltd., the UDA will pay
to Asia Pacific a sum representing the cost
of construction of the buildings as at the
date of construction, excluding all other
development on the said land as assessed by
the Chief Valuer.
From this amount the UDA will withhold the
sum of public funds spent by the Kaduwela
Pradeshiya Sabha (KPS) who the court held
had clearly been deceived into spending its
money to fill up 7.8 hectares of land
originally vested with the KPS but later
allocated to Asia Pacific.
Sumal Perera and Asia Pacific would also be
able to remove all movables within four
months of the judgment and hand over vacant
premises on or before February 8, 2009.
No fine for Sumal
The judgment may have ordered fines on the
one hand and costs of Rs. 500,000 be paid to
each of the petitioners in the case on the
other by a selection of the 14 respondents,
but Sumal Perera was not one of them.
In the final page of the 61 page judgment
the Supreme Court directed the Bribery
Commission to conduct an immediate inquiry
into the transaction under all relevant laws
on the actions of former President
Kumaratunga, Ronnie Peiris and original
shareholders of Asia Pacific Golf Course,
Siva Selvaratnam, Suen Selvaratnam and
Shantha Wijesinghe but neither Access Group
nor Sumal Perera now the owner of Asia
Pacific Golf Course were netted in with this
group.
Popular club
Certainly Perera's highly popular and oft
frequented Water's Edge enterprise has
served him well in monetary terms during its
operations. Perera and the Access Group is a
much larger entity than its recent purchase,
Asia Pacific Golf Course Ltd. The Access
logo continues to fly high on government
projects including the mega construction of
a fly over bridge at Nugegoda.
Abandoned by all however, it is the buyers
of the luxury villas that find themselves
left in the lurch with even Sumal Perera
allegedly dismissing their claims with a
flick of his hand vowing he will not pay
them back.
However it was a lure of luxury they would
not easily forget.
Like the elitist Romans of 50BC according to
Goscinny and Herge who were lured by glib
advertising at arenas into buying luxury
villas in the fictitious Mansion of the
Gods, only to find themselves in the
dangerous neighbourhood of a little Gaulish
village that housed the formidable duo
Obelix and Asterix the latter choc full of
magic potion the other bathed in it, these
businessmen and entrepreneurs were seduced
by dreams of nature parks and what not.
And just as in 50BC when the construction of
Caesar's Mansion of the Gods would have
potentially ruined a forest and wiped out
the wild boar - staple diet of the little
Gaulish village so did the construction of
Water's Edge denigrate the wetlands of
Battaramulla and wipe out the fishing cat
not to mention eight other species of
threatened animals.
Lured
These buyers were lured into purchasing
these plots due to several reasons. Firstly
the UDA featured prominently in their
dealings thus dressing the deal with a
legitimacy and respectability it obviously
did not have. Secondly while Asia Pacific
Golf Course Ltd., was a relatively unknown
company that was in fact cloaked in dubiety
the Access Group logo that accompanied the
brochures again instilled a certain
confidence at least of financial viability
in the potential buyers.
The Sales Agreement also undertook to
construct roads, provide water and
electricity with Sumal Perera allegedly
promising buyers that the construction of
the villas would attract duty free
concessions as the project was BOI approved.
Besides, blocks 27 and 28 were purchased by
Mahinda Wijesekera and his kith and kin.
Wijesekera was not only a cabinet minister
at the time he was a signatory to the
several Cabinet Memoranda on the subject
initiated by Chandrika Kumaratunga and the
PA government.
Promise of heaven
For that matter President Mahinda Rajapakse
was also a member of that cabinet and even
though Kumaratunga is held to have mislead
cabinet no minister can divest him or
herself from collective responsibility.
Meanwhile, what's not to like the potential
buyers would have thought to themselves as
they rushed to put pen to paper.
Sumal allegedly invested only Rs.16.8
million in the Asia Pacific Company under
his own name with all the rest of the moneys
for construction of the Club House and Golf
Course coming not only out of the sales of
the land for luxury villas but also the sale
of premium club membership at Rs. 250,000.
In fact the buyers of the land were not
offered free membership either but were
merely offered the choice of purchasing
membership which was limited to a certain
number.
Sumal Perera says some land owners have
asked them to be creditors in his company
but many are unhappy with this suggestion
stating they did not do business with his
company.
Hell on earth
Land owners say even their assessment
numbers have been granted to them from the
Kaduwela Pradeshiya Sabha while they have
been given registered ownership and the
government which is the final authority and
regulator has been implicit in the
transaction from start to finish. "So where
do we stand?" they ask, dismissing the
principle of Caveat Emptor or Buyer Beware
as unfair in this instance.
Even the judgment states that the land was
recommended to Asia Pacific by the UDA in
response to Asia Pacific's original inquiry
letter (Page 8 of the judgment). UDA also
voluntarily offered the cabinet to use the
Chief Valuer's valuation as the basis on
which the land to be sold. (Page 31 of the
judgement)
The Sunday Leader contacted Sumal Perera for
a comment however he declined to do so
stating his lawyers had advised him not to
speak to the media.
Paid Rs. 312 per perch
Ironically the original owners of the land
were paid compensation of only Rs. 312 per
perch when the land was acquired by the UDA
for the public purpose of urban development
and ostensibly for increasing the
parliamentary administrative complex and for
providing water retention as a low lying
area, in 1988.
Some of these original owners later
intervened as Petitioners in the Fundamental
Rights case stating they were deprived of
their land by the state not to serve any
public purpose but rather to benefit a
private company.
Deeds signed by UDA
Not only that, even though a glitter of
shining lights of the business world dazzled
by the Water's Edge brochure that promised
boating, golf, nature parks and water front
residencies now rushed to buy up their
holiday home away from home in the marsh
lands of Battaramulla once home to nine
threatened species of animal including the
fishing cat, they little anticipated the
fate that would befall them some five years
on.
Little wonder that they didn't. After all
their deeds were signed not only by Sumal
Perera, a private entrepreneur and by then
owner of Asia Golf Course Ltd., it was
signed by a more formidable entity. The
Urban Development Authority itself.
'Surely,' a businessman is entitled to
think. 'If the arm of the state is involved
what could go wrong?' What indeed!
No doubt the presence of the UDA in the
transaction with these businessmen buying
their future holiday villas was to instill
in them a sense of trust and confidence.
Small time crook in comparison though he was
compared to some of those politicians,
public officials and others impugned by the
Supreme Court, Sakvithi Ranasinghe had a
similar plan of action. He too instilled
confidence in his victims by showcasing a
number of allies and partners either with or
without their knowledge.
Nonetheless a large number of Sri Lanka's
rich list now entered the Water's Edge Villa
list. Primary among them were of course the
children of Sumal Perera - daughter Swasha
and son Shamal. Both purchased five lots
each while his brother in law D.D.S.
Ferdinando got one and directors of Asia
Pacific Golf Courses Ltd., Ranjan John
Suriyakumar Gomez and Joseph Christopher
Joshua seven plots each. (See box for others
who had purchased plots)
Be that as it may for those unrelated to
Sumal Perera life at the edge of the water
now holds no real thrill. Millions poorer
and with no hope of redress and with Perera
refusing to pay them back, their only
recourse is the law of the land. The very
law mind you that took away their land in
the first place.
|
List of those who sent out Letters of
Demand to Asia Pacific and UDA
Ranjan Madugalle, Aravinda De Silva,
Janath Vidanage, Bob Kundanmal, Roshan
A. Lyman, Behman Pestonjee, Pemaratne
Gamage, A.G.Wimalasiri, Vijaya Kumar &
Ravi Arjundas, Mrs. S. Roshni Advan,
Abdul Gani Mohamed Yaseen, M.Jahid Osman,
Sahid Osman, A.Razak Osman, Omar Jahi
Sulaiman, Prabhath Jayasundera, Pee Bee
Fashions Ltd, Dilip Bhambawani, Mahesan
Sunderalingam
Others who had purchased plots
Name
No. of plots
N.P. Perera
1
Harshan Seneviratne
1
Shanka V. Somasundaram
4
Roshan A Lyman
1
Dudley F.S. Thambinayagam
1
Conseptine V. Thambinayagam 1
Puvitha L. Thambinayagam 1
J.P.M.Jayasundera
1
K.V. and C.J. Jayasekera
1
H.C. and M.P.Wijesekera
1
V.Kumar and Ravi Arjundas 1
N.Rajanathan
1
D.A.R. Fernando
1
S.H.S. Mendis
1
Mukesh Khubchand Advani 1
Dilip T. Bhambawani
1
S.D.Munasinghe
1
Ranjan Madugalle
1
Aslam Omar
2
Sri Sagadewan
1
R.M. Obeyesekere
1
V.T. Obeyesekere
1
S.T. Obeyesekere
1
B. Obeyesekere
1
Aravinda De Silva
1
Kumudika M. Rufin
1
T.T.B.C. Fernando
2
Abdul Ganbi Mohamed Yaseen 1
Mohamed Jahid Osman 1
Mohamed Sahid Osman 1
Abdul Razak Osman
1
Omar Haji Sulaiman
1
D.B. Kundanmal
4
K. Omprashadan
2
Access International Pvt Ltd 2
Gratien Gunawardena
2
Ajit Johnpillai
2
Arun Kumar Thapar
2
Plastech (Pvt) Ltd
1
Janath Vidanage
1
Packlane Holdings Ltd
1
Mahesan Sunderalingam
1
Behman Pestongee
2
L. Wijesekera
1
P. Madanayake
1
D.A.J. Warnakulasuriya
1
Primal Mendis
2
Muhunthan Canagey
1
V.K. Vasan
3
Ranjan Mather
2
Pee Bee Fashions
1
|
Running circles around
Kilinochchi
|

Sarath Fonseka and
Gotabaya Rajapakse |
Akkarayankulam
captured three times
"Kilinochchi" advances far from the town
57th Division effectively stalled for over a
month
GR lashes out at FR lawyers
AF dropped a 'Hiroshima' worth of
bombs in the Wanni
By RanjithJayasundera
On July 31, 2008, in the tail-end of an
election campaign, the government announced
that the army had entered the Kilinochchi
District. Spurious reports about the
imminent fall of Kilinochchi Town have
followed ever since.
Yet three months and at least 526 dead and
3,102 seriously injured or maimed young
soldiers later, the latest reports
available claim that the army is still a
whole 9 km. from Kilinochchi town, and is
yet to cross the deadly A-9 highway at any
single point.
These reports give the lie to several
statements from some of the most senior
figures in prosecuting this war. President
Mahinda Rajapakse announced in New York on
September 22 that the army was a mere 4.5
kilometres from Kilinochchi.
Prime Minister Ratnasiri Wickremanayake
announced on the eve of the August
provincial council elections that
Kilinochchi town might fall "even tomorrow."
And the ever-astute Army Commander,
Lieutenant General Sarath Fonseka claimed
nearly two months ago at a book launch that
several buildings in Kilinochchi could
actually be "seen" from the soldiers'
positions then.
Super-vision
It is a pretty tough bet to see even the
mighty World Trade Centre in Fort from 10
kilometres away, but the Army Commander
claimed that several weeks (and much more
than 10 kilometres) ago, buildings in the
Tiger headquarters town were clearly
visible. Barring super-vision, that was also
a lie.
It is relevant therefore to ascertain what
territory the security forces have in
factliberated from the Tigers and how much
further they have to go before claiming like
George Bush six years ago, 'Mission
Accomplished'so that the people canhave
realistic expectations as to when the war
will end as opposed to politically motivated
deadlines dished out by the government and
its media propagandists.
Thus realistically theforce closest to
Kilinochchi, the army's 57th Division, has
had a far tougher time than the day to day
reports from the Defence Ministry or Media
Centre for National Security claim.
Should we cite any of the sources available
to us that give the reality of the sour,
gruesome picture on the battlefront, we run
the risk of being shut down under the
prevailing draconian media environment, yet
there is enough information in the Defence
Ministry reports to present at least an
abstract of the ground realities up north.
False victories
For example on October 18, the Defence
Ministry reported that the 57th Division had
secured the LTTE's defences around the
Akkarayankulam tank. Two weeks passed with
little mention of the 57th Division and its
exploits, and then the Ministry announced on
October 30 that the army had captured the
Akkarayankulam tank itself, as opposed to
just the defences around it.
A further week passed with no word from the
Defence Ministry on 57th Division's
exploits, and then on November 7, the
Defence Ministry announced that the army had
captured the "Akkarayankulam built-up,"
which itself is a whole 9 kilometres away
from Kilinochchi town.
In between each of these announcements we
were treated to news of the various exploits
and victories of Task Force 1 in capturing
areas of the west coast with little
resistance. So truth be told, the army
pointing at Kilinochchi had, in the three
weeks between October 18 and November 7,
advanced but a distance of three kilometres.
In this time, there were no reports of heavy
LTTE resistance on any front. Despite this,
the number of soldiers seriously injured or
maimed in October spiked to 1,122 from the
previous month's peak of 997.
Three times in three weeks
After Akkarayankulam was captured one way or
another three times in three weeks, there
has been a dip in reporting on the imminent
fall of Kilinochchi. By all accounts, 57th
Division's advance has once again reached a
sticky point, with little news of any
advance towards Kilinochchi town.
What the Defence Ministry has done instead
to keep up the hype is focus on the
achievements of Task Force 1, which has
cleared the western coast in the Kilinochchi
District and not the town.
While the 57th Division is ploughing into
the heart of Kilinochchi at snail's pace and
allegedly with heavy casualties, Task Force
1, which is making the headlines capturing
several areas on the north western coast, is
effectively avoiding and going around
Kilinochchi in its advance.
This is a prudent military tactic even under
the current risky strategy of fighting an
attrition war against a guerrilla terrorist
group; however it has little bearing on
efforts to capture Kilinochchi town.
Thus what the Defence Ministry is doing is
announcing the fall of several bastions in
the "Kilinochchi District" such as
Nachchikuda, Kiranchi, Devil's Point and
others in order to cover up the lack of
progress toward Kilinochchi town itself,
over what has now been a period of almost
one month.
Not an easy task
The map on this page shows both how far
removed these areas are from Kilinochchi
town, and how the shape of the army's
advance demonstrates that taking the LTTE
capital is not a job on the plate of Task
Force 1.
The government spin machine has already
begun to compensate for the fact that the
fall of Kilinochchi will be a while. The
'mission' of the army as stated by the
Defence Ministry is slowly being shifted to
that of opening a land route to Jaffna with
advances in Kilinochchi and Mulaithivu being
relegated to 'by-the-ways.'
What the government seems to do, with its
strategy of putting up 'territory maps,' is
to try and maximise the areas it can claim
to have captured, and thus present the LTTE
as surrounded before a general election.
While the Tigers are 'surrounded' in
Kilinochchi and Mulaithivu, Mahinda
Rajapakse can once again unleash his
determined charm on the southern masses and
lure them into swinging another election his
way.
"LTTE has begun to withdraw"
This would be difficult if the army instead
of capturing territory, kept bashing its
head against the brick wall that is
Kilinochchi town. Another strategy used by
the Defence Ministry in its web site, is to
announce that the LTTE has begun to withdraw
rapidly from Kilinochchi town, thereby
playing down the significance of taking the
city.
Gotabaya Rajapakse had these realities fully
planned out when he gave an interview to the
November edition of Business Today magazine.
In the interview he stated that the "task at
hand" for the military was to "open a land
route to Jaffna," while relegating
Kilinochchi and Mulaithivu to 'also-rans.'
Apart from creating a land route to Jaffna,
"we are also threatening other key points
such as Paranthan, Kilinochchi and
eventually Mulaithivu," the Defence
Secretary stated, playing down completely
the likelihood of an imminent fall of
Kilinochchi.
Rajapakse also found himself a new enemy
apart from the usual human rights activists
and media personalities he so often
chastises. In the Business Today interview
he came out stronger than ever against
"lawyers who submit FR applications" and who
"don't have to worry about national
security" thereafter.
"Law point is inadequate"
Speaking of these evil lawyers, the Defence
Secretary said that "they are not required
to understand that hardcore LTTE cadres
hardly ever talk. They ask 'why are you
detaining such a person without producing
him in court after detaining him or her for
three months?'" he complained.
He said that the "law point" of the lawyers
filing FR motions "is inadequate" and that
"there have been instances where the legal
system has released suspects who have after
their release turned up as suicide bombers."
"The FR lawyers must understand that we do
not enjoy arresting individuals and it is
not a game," he warned, asking what would
happen if someone released through an FR
petition was "part of a team sent to the
city to orchestrate a major attack?"
In effect, under the emergency regulations,
the Supreme Court cannot order the release
of anyone as long as the Defence Ministry
shows even the slightest shred of evidence
that the person may be chargeable for a
terrorism related offence. It doesn't take
much, and J.S. Tissainayagam will vouch for
that.
What Rajapakse is seeking is a Guantanamo-style
system of being able to arrest anyone he
pleases with no oversight whatsoever, and he
makes it clear these "FR lawyers" are
standing in his way. He fails to realise
that all strata of US society have condemned
the Guantanamo system or infinite, arbitrary
detention despite the fact that it applies
to foreigners, aliens, people of the distant
lands of Iraq, Afghanistan and beyond.
Power to detain citizens
Here the Defence Secretary is seeking the
power to detain citizens of his own country
- well, ours actually since he's an American
citizen - indefinitely in their own
motherland without giving them any recourse
to appeal.
This is also a man who has boasted, as
Mangala Samaraweera revealed in parliament,
that the government has unloaded 14.4
million kilogrammes of bombs in the Wanni.
He seems proud of that achievement.
14.4 million kilogrammes of today's military
grade explosive is equivalent to the
explosive force of over 18 kilotonnes of
TNT. The nuclear weapon dropped by the
United States on distant Hiroshima had an
estimated yield of between 13 to 18
kilotonnes of TNT.
President Harry Truman, at the time of that
bombing announced it with somewhat near the
appropriate sense of grimness. Anti-western
elements in the government are also quick to
point to the US as the only country in the
world that has deployed nuclear weapons
against an enemy nation.
Sri Lanka has no nuclear weapons, but from
what Samaraweera tells us in parliament we
have set a record of our own. We are the
only country to drop enough bombs over an
area to equate a nuclear yield, on our own
soil over the homes of our own people.
Of that achievement, Rajapakse seems
immensely proud, and as long at the public
continues to swallow the government's mighty
morphing propaganda effort of protecting a
perpetually imminent victory, the country
has yet to see the bulk of the suffering
that war will bring.