S.B. Dissanayake who is leading the UNP in
the Central Provincial Council elections and
is also the chief political organiser of the
party is a uniquely funny man. At a time
when dictatorships are completely out of
fashion - even in Latin America - he is
advocating a dictatorship for
Sri Lanka
for the country to be cured of its political
and perhaps social ills.
UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe may have
taken this proposal in good humour but he
shouldn't do so in the context of the fear
that is being generated among journalists
and some professionals of an emerging reign
of terror where any form of dissent is not
tolerated.
Wickremesinghe may have treated this
proposal which Dissanayake has been making
many times in interviews as a headline
grabbing exercise but what are the voters of
the Central Province to make out of the
grave warnings sounded by Wickremesinghe on
the dangers of the suppression of the
freedom of expression and Dissanayake's
advocacy of a dictatorship?
S.B. as Lanka's dictator?
Does Dissanayake want to be the dictator of
all Sri Lanka? He has not specifically said
so. However, people would not give much
thought to it because of the remote
possibility of Dissanayake as an all
powerful personage, sitting on a throne,
having people to crawl on all fours before
him. Had those who are close to levers of
power made similar noises, then there would
have been national consternation.
Unfortunately for
Sri Lanka,
the constitution of J.R .Jayewardene
virtually foisted a dictatorship on the
people with the executive presidency. Though
all political leaders after him declared
their intentions of doing away with the
executive presidency none attempted it
because it was with such powers that they
were able to survive.
President Mahinda Rajapakse who won the
presidential race by the skin of his teeth
and does not enjoy a parliamentary majority
has used the executive powers to the maximum
advantage to keep him in power. What
additional dictatorial powers are
Dissanayake proposing?
Curbing power
In order to curb the powers of the executive
president parliament unanimously enacted the
17th Amendment but the powers of the
executive president are so wide that he can
defy the enactment and carry on by
appointing key officials of his choice. Thus
what is called for is a return to a true
parliamentary democracy where the
sovereignty of the people will be vested in
parliament not in an another form of
dictatorship.
Dissanayake was a SLFPer who crossed over
to the UNP following disputes with his own
party. There are those UNPers who question
whether he is the proxy for powerful
interests outside the UNP - in short a
Trojan horse.
Reflex action
It is a common reflex action among Sri
Lankans, particularly those of the armed
forces - retired or not - to suggest
military rule or a dictatorship with
military backing - to overcome a political
crisis. One of the last politicians who
publicly suggested a 'little bit of
dictatorship' was Felix Dias Bandaranaike
for which he was roundly condemned.
Others cite
Singapore
under Lee Kuan Yew. While dictators,
military and civilian have been able to put
countries back on their feet like Park Chung
Hee of South Korea, Chang Kai Sheik of
Taiwan and to a lesser extent General
Suharto of
Indonesia
some dictatorships, particularly of the
military variety, have been abject failures.
Pakistan
is one such example while in Burma, khaki
clad thugs have ruled the country for over
40 years and are continuing to do so. These
are abject failures that are not cited in
defence of dictatorships.
Sri Lanka
under the rule of executive presidencies has
been 'One Man Shows,' despite all the
trappings of cabinets and parliaments. The
majority of representatives voted in by the
people and maintained at great cost to the
state have become mere robots raising their
arms when required to signal assent to their
boss.
State employees have been reduced to the
status even lower than domestic employees
and only a section of journalists and the
judiciary still act with independence even
though at great risk. It is under such
circumstances that S.B. Dissanayake calls
for a dictatorship. Would Dissanayake spell
out the constitution he is proposing?
More security measures?
Sri Lankan armed forces are on the brink of
a great military victory against terrorism.
But victory may not mean peace, joy and
happiness immediately to the people because
it could well be that terrorists would
infiltrate urban and rural communities and
commence guerrilla warfare endangering the
lives of civilians. Certain security
measures already being adopted may be to
counter such moves. It implies attempts
curbing civil liberates further.
President Rajapakse knows well that since
the war against terrorism commenced 25 years
ago, all governments did their utmost not to
curb civil liberties except in times and
areas drastic measures were called for. The
existing laws and regulations were
sufficient to maintain security. Let not the
idiotic calls for a dictatorship inspire
those imposing regulations on the people.
Many would consider Dissanayake's proposal
as a joke. But at times a joke can be
considered a very serious thing.