|
Mullaithivu IDPs: Rajapakse Burden
World
opinion has been centred for weeks on the tragic plight
of thousands of civilians sandwiched between the sea,
LTTE and government forces on a narrow sand strip near
Mullaithivu. Each day international TV channels reveal
the horrifying state of these people — wounded, sick,
starving — sprawled on bare earth, quite often without a
roof over their heads. Despite the grim scenes brought
into sitting rooms the world over, neither the Sri
Lankan government nor world leaders who voice their
concern regularly including the United Nations Secretary
General, have been able to do much for these people. In
practical terms all these lamentations add up only to
crocodile tears. On Thursday the United Nations
Security Council, the highest decision making body of
the world organisation demanded that the government
security forces and the LTTE take urgent action to
protect these civilians.
The
arguments bandied about by the government, the LTTE and
the ‘international community’ on who should be held
responsible for the plight of these people have been
repeated ad nauseam and need not be repeated here. In
the final analysis, the welfare of these people — Sri
Lankan citizens — is the responsibility of the Sri
Lankan government.
Despite journalists and human rights observers being
debarred from the scene of carnage, international TV
channels are showing these scenes, probably leaked out
by LTTE organs such as Tamilnet. The government is
clearly at the losing end of this propaganda war and Sri
Lanka is getting the reputation of a failed state, being
unable to protect its own citizens even though
government spokesmen including President Mahinda
Rajapakse claim that they have successfully debunked
this charge.
President Rajapakse since the commencement of military
operations after the Mavil Aru incident has taken pains
to stress that this is a ‘war of liberation of the Tamil
people against LTTE terrorism.’ Coalescing of military
and political forces of Karuna, the renegade LTTE
leader of the east with government forces reduced much
of the credibility of it being a ‘war of liberation’ of
the Tamil people not only among the Tamils but even
Sinhalese. In recent times Rajapakse threw out a new
line of ‘humanitarian operations’ against the LTTE.
This, even to the political gullible Sinhalese and
Tamils appeared to be another euphemism for military
operations.
Western powers involved in the Sri Lankan issue simply
did not buy it, just as much the people of this country
are laughing at the ‘humanitarian concerns’ expressed by
Western powers about military operations in and around
Mullaithivu when hundreds of innocent Afghan civilians
and Pakistanis are being killed by NATO operations in
Afghanistan and American operations in Pakistan. South
Asians seem to be drowning in a sea of ‘humanitarian
considerations.’
President Rajapakse’s credibility on his humanitarianism
suffers from linking this so called war of liberation to
his political agenda. He has won all the provincial
council elections conducted so far on his boast of
‘military victories.’ His supporters beat the war drums
saying that a defeat for his party at the elections
would mean that the people do not endorse his ‘war
against terrorism.’ He had proved to be an astute
follower of Clausewitz, the German military strategist
who held: War is a continuation of politics by other
means. And he won the war and his elections
convincingly. But where do all these proclamations about
‘humanitarianism’ and ‘humanitarian operations’ stand in
this context?
The
outside world, at least the Western powers — those who
still matter in terms of political and financial power
and military clout have no faith in him. These powers
have their own problems caused by the current
international financial crisis, but still they call the
shots. Sri Lanka’s application to the IMF for a US$1.9
billion loan is a case in point. On Monday, British
Foreign Secretary David Miliband indicated that Britain
does not support Sri Lanka’s request for an IMF loan
when he spoke to the media. He is quoted: ‘I think
you’ll find the issue not coming up at the IMF today
(Monday),’ when asked whether Britain supports Lanka’s
IMF loan application. Miliband had said that any
government should demonstrate that it would handle the
IMF money in a responsible way. He did not think that
Sri Lanka was in a position to do that yet. Miliband and
French Foreign Minister Kouchner who arrived in Sri
Lanka the week before to plead for a ceasefire were
rebuffed by the Sri Lanka government.
Certainly, the great majority of people stood by
President Rajapakse when he stood up to Western powers
and resisted attempts to interfere in Sri Lanka’s
internal affairs. No Sri Lankan worthy of his salt will
permit the derogation of the sovereignty of Lanka.
President Rajapakse’s success in war has been his
stubborn resistance to foreign interference whereas his
predecessors succumbed to it. But politics and diplomacy
have their limits.
The
Rajapakse administration appears to have adopted a
muscular form of diplomacy in tackling diplomats and
foreign leaders of powerful nations. Will Rogers, the
American legend is attributed with the remark:
‘Diplomats are essential to start a war as soldiers are
for finishing it.’ In this instance we are not referring
to our Foreign Service diplomats who still follow the
old school polite diplomatic ways but the new coterie of
tough talking, muscle flexing academics, relatives and
political appointees who have aggregated around the
President.
True
there are Third World countries with leaders who tell
mighty Western leaders where to get off. The Castros,
Hugo Chavez, Ahamedinejad and even Omar al Bashir of
Sudan do so. But they are all soaking in oil. What does
Rajapakse have? Lingerie, tea, rubber, coconuts,
medicinal oils and housemaids!
Nonetheless, we have to get our priorities right. The
first is to save the poor people trapped between the
security forces and the LTTE. Rajapakse can do it with a
‘humanitarian offensive’ even though it may cost
thousands of lives and bring upon him and his government
much international opprobrium as well as hatred of
Tamils around the world. But that would ensure victory
in forthcoming elections. The other is to make Britain
and other Western powers that seem to be adopting an
indulgent attitude towards the ruthless LTTE in their
own capitals rather than treat them as a terrorist
organisation, crack down on them as they did earlier.
Today’s attitude has conveyed the impression that the
LTTE can live to fight another day.
Last but not least is the political solution about which
there seems to be much prevarication by President
Rajapakse. If no such solution is forthcoming soon, we
will be back to square one.
 |