Holy
smokes! The Rajapakse government in a seizure of
morality — against booze, tobacco and sex — last week
announced measures to ‘wipe out the menace of alcohol
and tobacco,’ pornography on TV, screening of ‘adults
only films’ throughout the country, subjected all
commercial telecasts on local TV to be approved by
government before telecasting, as well as advertisements
on radio and newspapers to be approved by the Public
Performances Board. Government will also prohibit
printing of lewd publications and newspapers. The Public
Performances Board Act is to be given more powers.
Uneducated move
In
addition to all these measures, the Education Department
made an extremely uneducated move — banning mobile
phones in schools after a girl who was found with a
mobile phone, committed suicide in school. On Monday it
was reported that a 15-year-old schoolboy of Imaduwa who
had been punished by his father for smoking a cigarette
in a toilet too had committed suicide. The road to hell
it appears is paved with good intentions of moral
guardians.
Former
President of the Rationalist Society, Prof. Carlo
Fonseka having donned the garb of moral crusader, as
Chairman of the National Authority on Tobacco and
Alcohol at a press conference on Tuesday declared that
consumption of tobacco had been considerably reduced
according to a Global Youth Tobacco Survey.
Tobacco consumption among school children had declined
‘from 5 per cent in 1997 to 0.9 per cent while
consumption among adults had dropped from 13 per cent in
1997 to 5 per cent at present.’ From now on serious
steps would be taken to reduce tobacco and alcohol
consumption focused on preventing violation of the
National Authority on Tobacco and Alcohol (NATA) Act,
Fonseka declared.
Great is the Chinthanaya
Like
all appointees of the Rajapakse government Fonseka paid
lavish tributes to President Rajapakse who he said was
the first national leader to include anti-alcohol,
anti-tobacco and anti-drug policies as a high national
priority. Pity, he forgot to mention names of pioneers
of the Temperance Movement such as Anagarika Dharmapala
who campaigned vigorously for temperance at the height
of British imperialism when revenue from taverns was
considered vital to British interests.
True
enough they did not hold ‘national office’ at that time
but it was manifold more difficult a task than issuing
presidential declarations.
This
reduction in the amount of smoking by schoolboys claimed
would be much more convincing had the learned professor
told us of the methodology deployed in the survey and
the size of the sample studied. Quite often such surveys
are like opinion surveys conducted by ruling parties
before polls. To determine the smoking habits of little
rascals puffing away in closed toilets is no easy task.
As for
the tom-tom beating of the success of Mathata Thitha
(full-stop to intoxication) in all corners of Lanka, the
Professor faces the impossible task of contradicting the
statistics cited by the Minister of State Revenue and
Finance, Ranjith Siyambalapitiya in Parliament.
Production of liquor, the Minister said, had gone up by
16.9 percent in 2006 from the previous year (when the MT
programme commenced); by 30.2 percent in 2007; 19.4 per
cent in 2008.
Production of local arrack which stood at 38.4 million
litres in 2005 rose to 44.9 m litres in 2006; 50.88 m
litres in 2007 and 45.9 million litres in 2008. Foreign
liquor sales had shown similar trends. Little wonder
wags at the city’s bars say that Mathata Titha resulted
in Tithata Matha (Full-stop was drunk) and now it is
Mathata Hitha (Longing to drink). Arrack sales it should
be noted is only a fraction of kasippu or moonshine
sales — the poor man’s drink.
Sexless Lankans
All
Sri Lankan governments have been increasingly opposed to
sex. The accepted principle is: We Sri Lankans don’t
have sex. We simply multiply like amoeba by simply
splitting up into two or more amoeba. So no one will
raise an eyebrow over the ban on ‘adults only’ films or
pornography on TV. It will be well accepted by the pious
with acclaim even though they will be longing to see
such sex films.
Morality or politics
The
danger however is about all commercial telecasts as well
as radio and TV advertisements being subject to scrutiny
of the Public Performances Board (PPB). Is this move
made on behalf of safeguarding ‘the morals of the
nation’ or using morality as a fig leaf to safeguard the
interests of the government? Does it mean that political
advertisements such as those appearing in newspapers
prior to elections too will be subject to rulings of the
PPB? Is this preparation for elections?
Maniacs and nymphomaniacs
And
what of the ban on cellular phones in schools by the
Education Department, the museum of the fossilised
relics of the nation like school principals? To them,
cellular phones in the hands of girls or boys are
dangerous weapons which could turn the girls into
nymphomaniacs and boys into sex maniacs. They don’t see
the utility value such as calling parents at home or
their vehicles parked far away from school gates.
Perhaps time has dimmed their memories of such popular
ditties half a century ago such as:
Telephone cumbi digge aalay karanne,
Meet
me at the
Savoy, kiya,
OK my boy kiya,
Denne anney…
Those
were the days of land phones — one phone to about a
thousand people but still the mating calls went through.
With millions of cellular phones around — as much as
ball point pens — what can the fossils in this so called
Education Department do against youthful
desires?
History has shown us that good governance is only
possible through conviction and persuasion; not by
rules, regulations and legislative enactments. Nanny
governments, however well intentioned, have never been
successful..